High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis

NCT ID: NCT01873144

Last Updated: 2013-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HSS (3%) + epinephrine

Nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of HSS(3%) every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Epinephrine 1/1000

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

HSS 3%

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

HHHFNC+epinephrine+Normal Saline(0.9%)

Flow depending on weight (Tidal volume x respiratory rate x 9) and nebulized solution containing 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 plus 2 mL of Normal Saline (NS) (0.9%) every 4h and afterwards at physician in charge criteria.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Epinephrine 1/1000

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

HHHFNC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age

NS (0.9%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epinephrine 1/1000

Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Intervention Type DRUG

HSS 3%

Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Intervention Type DRUG

HHHFNC

Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age

Intervention Type DEVICE

NS (0.9%)

Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adrenaline 1/1000 Adrenalin 1/1000 Normal saline solution 0.9% Physiologic saline solution

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 6 months or less
* Moderate (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score of 4 or greater) viral bronchiolitis (as defined by McConnockie)
* Meeting Admission criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* History of prematurity
* Chronic lung disease
* Cystic fibrosis
* Congenital heart disease
* Neuromuscular disease
* Airway anomalies
* Immunodeficiency
* Those requiring immediate intubation and ventilation.
Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, Spain

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MªMercedes Bueno Campaña

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mercedes Bueno, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology. Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon. Madrid. SPAIN

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa

Leganés, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bueno Campana M, Olivares Ortiz J, Notario Munoz C, Ruperez Lucas M, Fernandez Rincon A, Patino Hernandez O, Calvo Rey C. High flow therapy versus hypertonic saline in bronchiolitis: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jun;99(6):511-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305443. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24521787 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC11-437

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Using HFNC in Bronchiolitis
NCT03342781 COMPLETED NA