Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

NCT ID: NCT01777347

Last Updated: 2014-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

778 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nebulized hypertonic saline solution reduces the admission rate 48 hours after initial treatment in the emergency department, when compared to normal saline solution (control).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute viral bronchiolitis remains a significant cause of hospitalization and to date, no treatment reduce the rate of hospitalization. The only accepted treatment for bronchiolitis is nasal cleaning, hydration and for hospitalized hypoxemic infants, oxygen administration.

Several studies shown that nebulization of hypertonic saline solution reduce length of stay in hospital for hospitalized infant but effect on rate of hospitalization remains unclear.

The investigators propose a randomized double blind multicenter clinical trial on infants 6 weeks to 12 months old with moderate or severe bronchiolitis, in 21 emergency departments of hospitals situated France, during 2 winter seasons.

The investigators hypothesize that infants with bronchiolitis treated with nebulized hypertonic 3% saline solution would have less risk of being hospitalized. Our principal objective is to determine if nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution reduces admission rate 24 hours after treatment compared to placebo.

Secondary objectives are to compare between groups intensity of respiratory symptoms measured by RDAI clinical score, duration of symptoms, length of hospital stay for hospitalized infants, adverse effects and health care utilization.

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with a diagnosis of moderately severe bronchiolitis will be approached for entry into the study. After the initial routine assessment, informed consent will be obtained and the infant will be randomized to receive treatment in a double-blinded fashion 4 ml of nebulized study solution either 3% hypertonic saline (HS, study group) or 0.9% saline (NS, control group) every 20 minutes for a total of 2 doses. After an observation period of 20 minutes following the last dose, the infant will be reassessed by the attending physician in the ER for disposition (admit, discharge home). All subsequent therapy, if needed, will be at the sole discretion of the attending physician. The family of each recruited subject will be contacted by phone 2, 7, 14 and 28 days later to assess resolution of symptoms.

Clinical response to the above treatment will also be determined independently by the study physician utilizing a standardized respiratory scoring system, the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI), at study entry and after each nebulization. The primary outcome measure is the rate of admission to hospital between the study and control groups 24 hours after inclusion. Secondary outcomes measure will involve the assessment of change in the RDAI between study entry and post-treatment, adverse effects, length of stay for hospitalized infant and health care utilization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3% Saline

Nebulized 3% Saline

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3% Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Two 4 mL nebulization of 3% saline with 20 minutes interval

0.9% Normal Saline

Nebulized 0.9% normal saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

0.9% Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Two 4 mL nebulization of 0.9% normal saline with 20 minutes interval

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3% Saline

Two 4 mL nebulization of 3% saline with 20 minutes interval

Intervention Type DRUG

0.9% Normal Saline

Two 4 mL nebulization of 0.9% normal saline with 20 minutes interval

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

3% Hypertonic Saline Solution for Inhalation (Mucoclear 3%) 0.9% Saline Solution for Inhalation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 6 weeks through 12 months
* First moderate to severe episode of acute viral bronchiolitis (history of viral upper respiratory tract infection plus wheezing and/or crackles on chest auscultation with respiratory distress ).
* Admission in Emergency Department
* Parental/guardian permission (informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria

* prematurity \< 37 weeks
* artificial ventilation in the neonatal period
* Chronic lung or heart disease
* history of immunodeficiency
* past use of nebulized HS
* initial need for intensive care of assisted ventilation
* Non-French speaking parent/guardian
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Weeks

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Gajdos, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - Paris Sud Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Jean Verdier

Bondy, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Ambroise Paré

Boulogne, , France

Site Status

CHU

Caen, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Antoine Béclère

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Louis Mouriez

Colombes, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien

Corbeil, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Fontainebleau

Fontainebleau, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Hôpital Mère Enfants

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Hôpital Femme Mère Enfants

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital d'enfants

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Mère - Enfants

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU Lenval

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Robert Debré

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôp Charles Nicolle - CHU Rouen

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Hôpital des enfants

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

André Mignot

Versailles, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Angoulvant F, Bellettre X, Milcent K, Teglas JP, Claudet I, Le Guen CG, de Pontual L, Minodier P, Dubos F, Brouard J, Soussan-Banini V, Degas-Bussiere V, Gatin A, Schweitzer C, Epaud R, Ryckewaert A, Cros P, Marot Y, Flahaut P, Saunier P, Babe P, Patteau G, Delebarre M, Titomanlio L, Vrignaud B, Trieu TV, Tahir A, Regnard D, Micheau P, Charara O, Henry S, Ploin D, Panjo H, Vabret A, Bouyer J, Gajdos V; Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (GUERANDE) Study Group. Effect of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Treatment in Emergency Departments on the Hospitalization Rate for Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Aug 7;171(8):e171333. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1333. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28586918 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P110143

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AOM11036

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IDRCB 2012-A00228-35

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Isotonic Saline for Children With Bronchiolitis
NCT05902702 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Nebulized Hypertonic Saline for Bronchiolitis
NCT00619918 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3