Inhaled Hypertonic Saline Use in the Emergency Department to Treat Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
NCT ID: NCT02045238
Last Updated: 2015-01-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Despite being a well known disease among pediatricians, there are few, if any, effective treatment options apart from oxygen supplementation and adequate hydration.
The purpose of this study is to determine wether nebulized hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective than normal saline (0,9%) when used in repeated doses during the first 24 hours of in-hospital treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypertonic Saline for Acute Bronchiolitis
NCT01247064
HYPERTONIC SALINE IN ACUTE VIRAL BRONCHIOLITIS: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT00729274
Hypertonic Saline Inhalation in Acute Bronchiolitis
NCT03880903
A Study of Hypertonic Saline for Infants Hospitalized With Bronchiolitis
NCT01488448
Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline in the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis
NCT02029040
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite the physiopathology and clinical course being well known among pediatricians, few therapeutical options other than adequate hydration and oxygen supplementation have proven to be effective Corticosteroids are not effective and bronchodilators are controversial, and treatment is still mostly empiric and lacking evidence.
In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in the use of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) as a promising approach. The rational is that HS would help reducing edema and mucus viscosity, enhancing its rheologic properties. Recent studies suggest that HS could reduce up to 1 day (25%) of time until discharge in admitted patients. In the Emergency Department, HS was not superior to other forms of treatment, but these studies lack power and similarities to draw further conclusions. Also, time of treatment and ideal interval between doses are not known as yet.
To our knowledge, few if any studies have assessed patients with an intermediary (up to 24h) time of stay, namely a short stay ward attached to an emergency department. Thus, we have endeavoured to determine if repeated doses of nebulized HS are superior to nebulized normal saline (NS) during the first 24 hour of treatment, when considered: rate of admission, time until discharge, time until attain discharge criteria, and rate of readmission after discharge.
Furthermore, most studies use HS associated to a bronchodilator, because of a theoretical possibility that HS alone could induce bronchoconstriction and worsen respiratory symptoms. However, recent studies have shown that HS use without bronchodilators have not caused any worsening of symptoms in bronchiolitis patients. Therefore, we propose to study the effect of HS alone, without the adding of bronchodilators, which would minimize bias in the treatment group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Normal Saline
Patients will receive inhaled normal saline, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat\>94% AND respiratory rate \<60 AND RDAI score \<4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
Chest X-Ray
Respiratory virus screening test
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
Hypertonic Saline
Patients will receive inhaled Hypertonic Saline 3%, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat\>94% AND respiratory rate \<60 AND RDAI score \<4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
Hypertonic Saline
Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.
Chest X-Ray
Respiratory virus screening test
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hypertonic Saline
Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.
Chest X-Ray
Respiratory virus screening test
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis (viral respiratory disease and wheezing)
* First episode of wheezing in life
* Moderate respiratory distress, defined as 2 of the following: Sat \<93%, respiratory rate \>60 and/or RDAI score \>4
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids or antibiotics in the 24 hours prior to admission or at any time during treatment.
* Other clinical conditions such as: prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, cardiac disease or immunodeficiencies.
* detection of alveolar infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia in radiologic examination
* respiratory impairment requiring mechanical ventilation on arrival to hospital.
12 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mateus Deckers Leme
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mateus D Leme, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sao Paulo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Sao Paulo University
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Anil AB, Anil M, Saglam AB, Cetin N, Bal A, Aksu N. High volume normal saline alone is as effective as nebulized salbutamol-normal saline, epinephrine-normal saline, and 3% saline in mild bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21108.
Mandelberg A, Tal G, Witzling M, Someck E, Houri S, Balin A, Priel IE. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):481-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.2.481.
Kuzik BA, Al-Qadhi SA, Kent S, Flavin MP, Hopman W, Hotte S, Gander S. Nebulized hypertonic saline in the treatment of viral bronchiolitis in infants. J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;151(3):266-70, 270.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub3.
Principi T, Komar L. A critical review of "a randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in the emergency department.". J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18(2):e273-4. Epub 2011 May 16. No abstract available.
Jacobs JD, Foster M, Wan J, Pershad J. 7% Hypertonic saline in acute bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e8-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1646. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
Mandelberg A, Amirav I. Hypertonic saline or high volume normal saline for viral bronchiolitis: mechanisms and rationale. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):36-40. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21185. No abstract available.
Kuzik BA, Flavin MP, Kent S, Zielinski D, Kwan CW, Adeleye A, Vegsund BC, Rossi C. Effect of inhaled hypertonic saline on hospital admission rate in children with viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial. CJEM. 2010 Nov;12(6):477-84. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012690.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University Hospital of Sao Paulo University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1263/13 - University Hospital
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.