Inhaled Hypertonic Saline Use in the Emergency Department to Treat Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

NCT ID: NCT02045238

Last Updated: 2015-01-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute viral bronchiolitis is an extremely common childhood disease, responsible for approximately 17% of childhood admissions to hospital per year, with an annually cost that reaches U$ 500 million.

Despite being a well known disease among pediatricians, there are few, if any, effective treatment options apart from oxygen supplementation and adequate hydration.

The purpose of this study is to determine wether nebulized hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective than normal saline (0,9%) when used in repeated doses during the first 24 hours of in-hospital treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute viral bronchiolitis is a lower airway infection, caused manly by Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Near 1% of children up to 2 years of age get it with sufficient severity to warrant hospital admission, with an annual cost of about U$ 500 million in the US, superior, for instance, than cystic fibrosis annual cost.

Despite the physiopathology and clinical course being well known among pediatricians, few therapeutical options other than adequate hydration and oxygen supplementation have proven to be effective Corticosteroids are not effective and bronchodilators are controversial, and treatment is still mostly empiric and lacking evidence.

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in the use of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) as a promising approach. The rational is that HS would help reducing edema and mucus viscosity, enhancing its rheologic properties. Recent studies suggest that HS could reduce up to 1 day (25%) of time until discharge in admitted patients. In the Emergency Department, HS was not superior to other forms of treatment, but these studies lack power and similarities to draw further conclusions. Also, time of treatment and ideal interval between doses are not known as yet.

To our knowledge, few if any studies have assessed patients with an intermediary (up to 24h) time of stay, namely a short stay ward attached to an emergency department. Thus, we have endeavoured to determine if repeated doses of nebulized HS are superior to nebulized normal saline (NS) during the first 24 hour of treatment, when considered: rate of admission, time until discharge, time until attain discharge criteria, and rate of readmission after discharge.

Furthermore, most studies use HS associated to a bronchodilator, because of a theoretical possibility that HS alone could induce bronchoconstriction and worsen respiratory symptoms. However, recent studies have shown that HS use without bronchodilators have not caused any worsening of symptoms in bronchiolitis patients. Therefore, we propose to study the effect of HS alone, without the adding of bronchodilators, which would minimize bias in the treatment group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchiolitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normal Saline

Patients will receive inhaled normal saline, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat\>94% AND respiratory rate \<60 AND RDAI score \<4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Chest X-Ray

Intervention Type RADIATION

Respiratory virus screening test

Intervention Type OTHER

Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate

Hypertonic Saline

Patients will receive inhaled Hypertonic Saline 3%, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat\>94% AND respiratory rate \<60 AND RDAI score \<4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hypertonic Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.

Chest X-Ray

Intervention Type RADIATION

Respiratory virus screening test

Intervention Type OTHER

Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hypertonic Saline

Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Chest X-Ray

Intervention Type RADIATION

Respiratory virus screening test

Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \< 12 months
* Clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis (viral respiratory disease and wheezing)
* First episode of wheezing in life
* Moderate respiratory distress, defined as 2 of the following: Sat \<93%, respiratory rate \>60 and/or RDAI score \>4

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous episodes of wheezing in history
* Use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids or antibiotics in the 24 hours prior to admission or at any time during treatment.
* Other clinical conditions such as: prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, cardiac disease or immunodeficiencies.
* detection of alveolar infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia in radiologic examination
* respiratory impairment requiring mechanical ventilation on arrival to hospital.
Maximum Eligible Age

12 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mateus Deckers Leme

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mateus D Leme, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sao Paulo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Sao Paulo University

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anil AB, Anil M, Saglam AB, Cetin N, Bal A, Aksu N. High volume normal saline alone is as effective as nebulized salbutamol-normal saline, epinephrine-normal saline, and 3% saline in mild bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21108.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19953579 (View on PubMed)

Mandelberg A, Tal G, Witzling M, Someck E, Houri S, Balin A, Priel IE. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):481-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.2.481.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12576370 (View on PubMed)

Kuzik BA, Al-Qadhi SA, Kent S, Flavin MP, Hopman W, Hotte S, Gander S. Nebulized hypertonic saline in the treatment of viral bronchiolitis in infants. J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;151(3):266-70, 270.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17719935 (View on PubMed)

Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23900970 (View on PubMed)

Principi T, Komar L. A critical review of "a randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in the emergency department.". J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18(2):e273-4. Epub 2011 May 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21633141 (View on PubMed)

Jacobs JD, Foster M, Wan J, Pershad J. 7% Hypertonic saline in acute bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e8-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1646. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24344111 (View on PubMed)

Mandelberg A, Amirav I. Hypertonic saline or high volume normal saline for viral bronchiolitis: mechanisms and rationale. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):36-40. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21185. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20014350 (View on PubMed)

Kuzik BA, Flavin MP, Kent S, Zielinski D, Kwan CW, Adeleye A, Vegsund BC, Rossi C. Effect of inhaled hypertonic saline on hospital admission rate in children with viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial. CJEM. 2010 Nov;12(6):477-84. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012690.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21073773 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.hu.usp.br

University Hospital of Sao Paulo University

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1263/13 - University Hospital

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Isotonic Saline for Children With Bronchiolitis
NCT05902702 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Nebulized Hypertonic Saline for Bronchiolitis
NCT00619918 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3