Propolis Improves Glycemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Periodontitis
NCT ID: NCT02794506
Last Updated: 2016-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Propolis is a natural resin made by bees from various plant sources. Propolis exerts antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and antidiabetic properties. The purpose of this study was to assess the adjunctive benefit of propolis supplementation in individuals with both chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).
Methods:
A 6-month randomized blinded clinical trial comparing SRP with placebo (placebo+SRP group, n=26) or combined with a 6- month regimen of 400 mg oral propolis once daily (propolis+SRP group, n=26) was performed in patients with long-standing T2DM and chronic periodontitis. Treatment outcomes included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum N€-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML) and changes in periodontal parameters.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Locally Delivered Propolis Gels in Periodontitis
NCT06663995
Effect of Antioxidant Intake on Resistin Levels In Patients With Gum Disease and Diabetes
NCT02775266
The Effect of Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy Plus Doxycycline on HbA1c in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT02845024
Oxidative Stress Markers Evaluation Before and After Periodontal Treatment of Diabetics Type 2 Patients
NCT01475435
Glycemic Control in T2DM Through Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy
NCT03343366
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder characterized by frequent periods of hyperglycemia, which induce certain molecular pathways that seem to be crucial to the initiation of angiopathic complications of DM. Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain the pathogenicity of complications of hyperglycemia such as protein kinase C isoforms, enhanced polyol pathway flux, and increased accumulation of advanced glycosylated end-products. A dysregulated immune response stemming from an inappropriate cytokine production is a possible mechanism underpinning the cross-susceptibility between periodontal disease and DM. DM has been unambiguously determined as one of the major risk factors of periodontitis. It was reported that the risk of periodontitis increases to almost threefold in diabetic patients when compared to healthy individuals. The glycemic control level is believed to be of paramount importance as a determinant of the increased risk for developing complications. Diabetic patients with an HbA1c level more than 9% were found to have an increased prevalence of advanced chronic periodontitis in comparison to healthy people according to the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III.
Two decades ago, periodontitis was added to represent the sixth complication of DM. Individuals suffering from periodontal diseases often have increased serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α. Diabetic patients with periodontitis possess hyperinflammatory immune cells that lead to enhanced release of proinflammatory cytokines, which eventually lead to insulin resistance resulting in a greater risk of poor glycemic control when compared to diabetic patients without periodontitis. The accumulation of irreversible advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), predominantly N€-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML) has shown to alter cell function and tissue structure. Due to difficulty in managing diabetes; there is a critical need for new therapeutic modalities for prevention of diabetes-related complications.
Propolis is a natural resin synthesized by honey bees from substances extracted from parts of some plants, buds and sap. Due to its physical characteristics, propolis is utilized by the honey bees to protect the hives against foreign invaders. Propolis has been used for centuries as a homeopathic medicine known for its anti-inflammatory properties, especially in Europe and ancient Egypt. It has traditionally been used for the management of numerous diseases, such as gastrointestinal disorders and mucocutaneous infections of fungal, bacterial and viral etiology.
There are several types of propolis that differ in composition depending on the plant source which varies according to the geographic zone such as Brazil, Peru, China and Europe. Propolis contains more than more than 230 constituents, including flavonoids, cinnamic acids and their esters, caffeic acid and caffeic acid phenethyl ester. It has been found to have a wide array of biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, fungicidal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, hepatoprotective, free radical scavenging, immunomodulatory and anti-diabetic activity. Recently, investigations revealed that caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is an important active molecule found in propolis and is responsible for most of its therapeutic properties.
The actions of Chinese and Brazilian propolis in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in Sprague Dawley rats was explored and the results indicated that both types of propolis significantly inhibited more body weight loss and plasma glucose increase in experimental rats. Additionally, rats treated with Chinese propolis exhibited an 8.4% reduction in HbA1c levels in comparison to non-treated diabetic group.
Hence, it was hypothesized that periodontal therapy with SRP in conjunction with oral daily supplementation of propolis in patients with chronic periodontitis and T2DM might improve both diabetic and periodontal outcomes. Thus, the aim of the current study is to evaluate whether the adjunctive therapy of oral propolis supplementation to SRP compared to SRP plus placebo, reduces glycated hemoglobin and improves clinical and periodontal parameters after 6 months of therapy in individuals with chronic periodontitis and T2DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Population:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mansoura University. Subjects were selected during their recall maintenance visits in the Internal Medicine Hospital, Mansoura University, between June and December in 2014. Patients filled out questionnaires gathering information on their dental and oral health care followed by a periodontal screening examination to determine eligible individuals. Patients were considered eligible for the study if they had T2DM with a minimum of five years duration and had been taking stable doses of oral hypoglycemic drugs and/or insulin for at least 6 months. In addition, they should have chronic periodontitis with probing pocket depth and clinical attachment loss ≥ 5 mm with detectable bleeding on probing in at least one site in each sextant. Patients should have a minimum of 20 teeth to be selected. All patients were diagnosed to have moderate to severe chronic periodontitis according to Armitage criteria (24). Exclusion criteria included smokers, recent extended use of antibiotics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 3 months, patients who had any periodontal therapy within one year, patients with grade 3 or 4 retinopathy, pregnancy or women using oral contraceptives. Enrolled patients signed written informed consents for study participation.
Study Design:
Fifty two people with T2DM diagnosed with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned using computer-generated random tables to receive propolis (400 mg capsule orally once daily for six months) as adjuvant to scaling and root planing (Propolis+ SRP group, n = 26), or matching placebo capsules for 6 months in addition to scaling and root planing (Placebo+SRP group, n = 26) in this parallel randomized blinded controlled trial with an allocation ratio = 1:1. The generated allocation sequences were concealed in closed stapled envelopes until interventions were assigned. Investigators were not involved during randomization. Propolis commercially named BioPropolis (Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries for International Business Establishment Co. IBE Pharma, Cairo, Egypt) and matching placebo capsules were used in the study. All participants in both groups were assigned to receive equal number of capsules during the 6- month period. Vials which contain propolis and placebo drugs were labeled with specific codes unknown to patients and investigators. Patients were instructed to take only one capsule daily from the given vial. Patient compliance was calculated by counting the remaining capsules in each returned vial every month. Untoward side effects of both medications were queried and recorded at each visit during the study period.
All individuals received meticulous full mouth scaling and root planing (SRP) with hand curettes and ultrasonic tips under local anesthesia until root surfaces were smooth by clinician (MA) in a single visit. Oral hygiene instructions and motivations for proper tooth brushing and dental flossing were given to the patients. Chlohexidine 0.12% mouthrinse was prescribed for all patients for only two weeks after SRP.
Clinical Periodontal Measurements:
Clinical periodontal parameters including probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) (distance from the CEJ to the base of the pocket), Eastman interdental bleeding (EIBI) , gingival (GI) and plaque (PI) indices were assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after therapy by the examiner (HE). Intra-examiner calibration was achieved by examination of 10 patients twice, 24 hours apart before starting the study. Calibration was accepted if measurements of PD and CAL (by using UNC-15 probe) at baseline and 24 hours were similar to 1 mm at the 90% level.
Collection and analysis of Blood:
10 mL of venous blood from the antecubital vein of all participants were collected in heparinized vacutainer tubes at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. Measurements of HbA1c were carried out via an automated affinity chromatography system (Bio-Rad Micromat II, Hercules, CA). Fasting plasma glucose levels (FPG) were measured by the standard glucose oxidase method. The serum concentration of N€-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML) was assessed by N€-(carboxymethyl) lysine (CML) ELISA Kit of CML protein adducts (OxiSelect™, Catalog Number STA-316, Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The amount of CML adduct in protein samples was evaluated by comparing the absorbance to a known CML-BSA standard curve as described by the manufacturer.
Study outcomes:
The primary outcome of the present clinical trial was the change in HbA1c levels after 6 months of therapy. Secondary outcomes included the change in HbA1c levels after 3 months in addition to the amount of CAL gain, PD reduction and changes in FPG and serum CML levels after 3 and 6 months of therapy.
Statistical Analysis:
A power analysis was performed before commencement of the trial with type I error α = 0.05, β = 0.14 and (1-β) = 0.86. The power was calculated as p = 0.8641 and the estimated minimum sample size required was found to be 20 per each group to achieve a power of 80% based on achievement of 6-month reduction of HbA1c of the test group over the control by 0.8%. All data were explored by using Kolmogrov-Smirnov test of normality. Parametric data were presented as mean ± SD. Baseline comparisons were made using Student's t-test. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Holm-Sidak post hoc correction for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant changes at different time intervals. Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney test were used to detect differences per group and between groups over time. The α-level for significance was set at 0.05.Statistical analyses were calculated by a statistical software program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 19.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propolis
400 mg oral proplois (capsule) was given to participants once daily for 6 months after performing scaling and root planing.
Propolis
Propolis capsules was taken by the experimental group for 6 months after receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).
Placebo
Placebo capsule was given to participants once daily for 6 months after performing scaling and root planing.
Placebo
Placebo capsules was taken by the control group for 6 months after receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Propolis
Propolis capsules was taken by the experimental group for 6 months after receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).
Placebo
Placebo capsules was taken by the control group for 6 months after receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients should have chronic periodontitis with probing pocket depth and clinical attachment loss ≥ 5 mm with detectable bleeding on probing in at least one site in each sextant.
* Patients should have a minimum of 20 teeth to be selected.
* All patients were diagnosed to have moderate to severe chronic periodontitis according to Armitage criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
* Recent extended use of antibiotics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 3 months.
* Patients who had any periodontal therapy within one year.
* Patients with grade 3 or 4 retinopathy.
* Pregnancy.
* Women using oral contraceptives.
38 Years
63 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Mohamed Anees
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Anees
Lecturer of Oral Medicine and Periodontology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hesham M. El-Sharkawy, Ass.Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schalkwijk CG, Stehouwer CD. Vascular complications in diabetes mellitus: the role of endothelial dysfunction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2005 Aug;109(2):143-59. doi: 10.1042/CS20050025.
Piarulli F, Sartore G, Lapolla A. Glyco-oxidation and cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a clinical update. Acta Diabetol. 2013 Apr;50(2):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0412-3. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
Folli F, Corradi D, Fanti P, Davalli A, Paez A, Giaccari A, Perego C, Muscogiuri G. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus micro- and macrovascular complications: avenues for a mechanistic-based therapeutic approach. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2011 Sep;7(5):313-24. doi: 10.2174/157339911797415585.
Hegab Z, Gibbons S, Neyses L, Mamas MA. Role of advanced glycation end products in cardiovascular disease. World J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 26;4(4):90-102. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i4.90.
Mahanonda R, Pichyangkul S. Toll-like receptors and their role in periodontal health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2007;43:41-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00179.x. No abstract available.
Soskolne WA, Klinger A. The relationship between periodontal diseases and diabetes: an overview. Ann Periodontol. 2001 Dec;6(1):91-8. doi: 10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.91.
Salvi GE, Yalda B, Collins JG, Jones BH, Smith FW, Arnold RR, Offenbacher S. Inflammatory mediator response as a potential risk marker for periodontal diseases in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. J Periodontol. 1997 Feb;68(2):127-35. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.127.
Negishi J, Kawanami M, Terada Y, Matsuhashi C, Ogami E, Iwasaka K, Hongo T. Effect of lifestyle on periodontal disease status in diabetic patients. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2004 Oct;6(4):120-4.
Garcia D, Tarima S, Okunseri C. Periodontitis and glycemic control in diabetes: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015 Apr;86(4):499-506. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140364. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
Loe H. Periodontal disease. The sixth complication of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1993 Jan;16(1):329-34. No abstract available.
Chen L, Chen R, Wang H, Liang F. Mechanisms Linking Inflammation to Insulin Resistance. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:508409. doi: 10.1155/2015/508409. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
Mendez JD, Xie J, Aguilar-Hernandez M, Mendez-Valenzuela V. Trends in advanced glycation end products research in diabetes mellitus and its complications. Mol Cell Biochem. 2010 Aug;341(1-2):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0434-5. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Miao M, Niu Y, Xie T, Yuan B, Qing C, Lu S. Diabetes-impaired wound healing and altered macrophage activation: a possible pathophysiologic correlation. Wound Repair Regen. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):203-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00772.x.
Gabrys J, Konecki J, Krol W, Scheller S, Shani J. Free amino acids in bee hive product (propolis) as identified and quantified by gas-liquid chromatography. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1986 Jun;18(6):513-8. doi: 10.1016/0031-6989(86)90146-3.
Sanghani NN, Bm S, S S. Health from the hive: propolis as an adjuvant in the treatment of chronic periodontitis - a clinicomicrobiologic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):ZC41-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8817.4856. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
Santos VR, Pimenta FJ, Aguiar MC, do Carmo MA, Naves MD, Mesquita RA. Oral candidiasis treatment with Brazilian ethanol propolis extract. Phytother Res. 2005 Jul;19(7):652-4. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1715.
Coelho LG, Bastos EM, Resende CC, Paula e Silva CM, Sanches BS, de Castro FJ, Moretzsohn LD, Vieira WL, Trindade OR. Brazilian green propolis on Helicobacter pylori infection. a pilot clinical study. Helicobacter. 2007 Oct;12(5):572-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00525.x.
Nolkemper S, Reichling J, Sensch KH, Schnitzler P. Mechanism of herpes simplex virus type 2 suppression by propolis extracts. Phytomedicine. 2010 Feb;17(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Adnyana IK, Midorikawa K, Matsushige K, Message D, Huertas AA, Kadota S. Cytotoxic, hepatoprotective and free radical scavenging effects of propolis from Brazil, Peru, the Netherlands and China. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000 Sep;72(1-2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00252-x.
Czyzewska U, Kononczuk J, Teul J, Dragowski P, Pawlak-Morka R, Surazynski A, Miltyk W. Verification of chemical composition of commercially available propolis extracts by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. J Med Food. 2015 May;18(5):584-91. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2014.0069. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
Zhu W, Chen M, Shou Q, Li Y, Hu F. Biological activities of chinese propolis and brazilian propolis on streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:468529. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neq025. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Armutcu F, Akyol S, Ustunsoy S, Turan FF. Therapeutic potential of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2015 May;9(5):1582-1588. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2346. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Tolba MF, Azab SS, Khalifa AE, Abdel-Rahman SZ, Abdel-Naim AB. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester, a promising component of propolis with a plethora of biological activities: a review on its anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective, and cardioprotective effects. IUBMB Life. 2013 Aug;65(8):699-709. doi: 10.1002/iub.1189. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Armitage GC. Periodontal diagnoses and classification of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2004;34:9-21. doi: 10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.003421.x. No abstract available.
Abrams K, Caton J, Polson A. Histologic comparisons of interproximal gingival tissues related to the presence or absence of bleeding. J Periodontol. 1984 Nov;55(11):629-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.11.629.
SILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available.
LOE H, SILNESS J. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963 Dec;21:533-51. doi: 10.3109/00016356309011240. No abstract available.
Rosevear JW, Pfaff KJ, Service FJ, Molnar GD, Ackerman E. Glucose oxidase method for continuous automated blood glucose determination. Clin Chem. 1969 Aug;15(8):680-98. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DENT-1971
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.