Outcomes of Renal Function in Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) Determined By Comparison of Target Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of 65 - 70 Mmhg Versus ≥ 85 Mmhg
NCT ID: NCT02789150
Last Updated: 2018-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2018-01-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI to Assess the Effect of Terlipressin in Patients With Acute Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS-AKI)
NCT03483272
Development and Validation of an Enhanced Prediction Score for Postoperative Acute Renal Failure After Liver Resection
NCT01318798
Assessment of Blood Pressure Control and Target Organ Damage in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension -II
NCT02078115
Bladder Pressure Predicting Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients as Compared to Hemodynamic Parameters
NCT01363505
Evaluation of Renal Blood Flow Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhotic Patients: A Pilot Study
NCT02147470
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators propose that there will be no difference clinical outcomes as evidenced by a significant difference in urine output or change in creatinine between the MAP target ≥ 85mmhg and the MAP target of 65-70 mmhg.
Primary end point:
To determine if High MAP or Low MAP will provide the most optimal renal function. The primary endpoints will be 96h UOP and change in creatinine levels. UOP will be calculated as cc/24 hours. The investigators will compare the change in urinary output of day 1 versus day 4. Creatinine will be measured daily and the change from initiation to completion of the study will be recorded. The mean values of these will be compared.
Secondary end point:
To determine if High MAP or Low MAP will decrease the occurrence of cardiac events (arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions) and vascular events (limb or intestinal ischemia).
Study Design:
This is a prospective, unblinded, randomized, Two-arm treatment, pilot study. Patients will undergo block randomization to receive either a MAP ≥ 85mmhg or a MAP 65-70mmhg.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MAP 65-70
Goal MAP of 65-70
Norepinephrine (Levophed)
Titrate norepinephrine to MAP 65-70
MAP greater than or equal to 85
MAP greater than or equal to 85
Norepinephrine (Levophed)
Titrate norepinephrine to MAP 85 or greater
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Norepinephrine (Levophed)
Titrate norepinephrine to MAP 65-70
Norepinephrine (Levophed)
Titrate norepinephrine to MAP 85 or greater
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. chronic or acute liver disease with advanced hepatic failure and portal hypertension;
2. the serum creatinine is greater than 1. 5 mg/dL or 24 hour creatinine clearance of less than 40 ml/min;
3. absence of shock, ongoing bacterial infection, and current or recent treatment with nephrotoxic drugs;
4. absence of gastrointestinal fluid losses (repeated vomiting or intense diarrhea) or renal fluid losses;
5. no sustained improvement in renal function defined as a decrease in serum creatinine to less than 1.5 mg/dL or increase in 24 hour creatinine clearance to 40 ml/min or more following diuretic withdrawal and expansion of plasma volume with 1.5 L of isotonic saline;
6. proteinuria less than 500 mg/dL;
7. no ultrasonic evidence of obstructive uropathy or parenchymal renal disease. 5. In addition, patients must meet the definition of HRS type I or HRS type I
<!-- -->
1. -HRS I defined by a rapid deterioration in kidney function with the serum creatinine increasing by more than 100% from baseline to greater than 2.5mg/dl within a two week period.
2. -HRS II defined as: patients with refractory ascites with either a steady but moderate degree of functional renal failure (≥ 1.5mg/dl) or deterioration in kidney function that does not fulfill the criteria for HRS type I
Exclusion Criteria
2\. artificial liver support therapies 3. ongoing gastrointestinal bleeding 4. active surgical issues 5. pre-existing TIPS or TIPS placed during hospital stay 6. long standing hypertension 7. improvement in renal function after central blood volume expansion contraindications to norepinephrine (active myocardial event, ventricular arrhythmia, obstructive physiology, limb ischemia) 8. Pregnancy 9. Treating physicians refusing to enroll patient
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Louisville
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Saad
Associate professor of medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Varajic B, Cavallazzi R, Mann J, Furmanek S, Guardiola J, Saad M. High versus low mean arterial pressures in hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized controlled pilot trial. J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14.1190
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.