RCT: Compare - Pneupac VR1 to Manual Ventilation in Intubated Patients
NCT ID: NCT02782871
Last Updated: 2022-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autotitrating Versus Standard Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Acute Exacerbation of Respiratory Failure
NCT01174316
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Ventilation Using a Novel Full-Face Mask Versus Conventional Helmet
NCT00944437
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), Face-mask Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) & Helmet NIV in COVID-19 ARDS Patients
NCT04715243
Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Set-up of Automated NIV in Obese Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure
NCT02342899
Randomized Controlled Study on T-PEP Versus IPV Method for Lower Respiratory Airways Clearance in Tetraplegic Tracheotomized Spinal Cord Injured Patients
NCT04142814
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Studies show that use of manual ventilation causes variability in respiratory parameters and blood gas values due to inconsistent ventilation. A study in 2003 found that portable ventila-tor provided more consistent ventilation and patients were less likely to have a disparity in their blood gases, oxygenation and ventilation.. However, conventional ventilators are bulky, heavy, expensive and few and far between in the hospital and, in particular, the pre-hospital setting. The Pneupac VR1 ventilator is simple to use, small, portable and durable. It is easy to clean, low cost, light weight and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible.
The study will aim to directly compare the efficiency and efficacy (ventilation rate and tidal volumes) of manual ventilation against a new device, VR-1 portable ventilator, by Smith-Medical. The device is CE approved. The RCT will compare the efficacy and efficiency during transfer of the patient from theaters to intensive care in our establishment. The endpoint will be arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and transfer onto the ICU ventilator. This will be measured by collecting the pCO2, taken from an already in-situ arterial blood gas (ABG), at two time points - (a) just before patient transfer from theaters to the intensive care unit and (b) upon arrival at the intensive care unit and just prior to transfer onto the ITU ventilator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Manual ventilation with Mapleson C-circuit
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
Pneupac VR1 portable ventilator
Pneupac VR1
A portable mechanical ventilator/resuscitator for medical personnel in the hospital, ambu-lance, fire, and police services.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pneupac VR1
A portable mechanical ventilator/resuscitator for medical personnel in the hospital, ambu-lance, fire, and police services.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
* Elective surgery
* ASA 1-3
* Undergoing Head and neck surgery, where routine care includes intubation, arterial line and post-operative transfer to intensive care unit intubated .
* Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
* Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have refused consent to participate in trial
* Emergency surgery
* Those patients who do not require intubation, arterial line and/ or transfer to intensive care intubated as routine practice for type of surgery/ procedure being undertaken
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St Thomas' Hospital, London
OTHER
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Boston
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Guy's & St Thomas' Foundation NHS Trust R&D Department
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GSTT 2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.