Feasibility Study Testing Transcriptional Responses as an Indicator of Individualised Responses to Radiation Effects

NCT ID: NCT02780375

Last Updated: 2018-10-31

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 20 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2016-09-12
• Study Completion Date: 2018-07-17

Brief Summary

Peripheral blood samples will be taken with informed consent from radiotherapy patients undergoing standard radiotherapy at The Royal Marsden before and during treatment for breast, lung, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours. Responses from panels of up to 800 coding and non-coding RNAs will be assessed in the samples using the nCounter system. Candidate genes identified by Public Health England, Columbia University and/or in the literature as being specific to radiation responses will be included, together with genes relevant to systemic inflammatory responses, to identify transcriptional responses for a range of doses and exposures on an inter-individual basis. Data will be analysed using existing and new statistical tools focused on count data modelling. The intended outcome is identification of a radiation specific panel of genes to inform individual radiation responses and if the results are favourable, a large scale follow up to this proposed pilot is expected in due course.

Detailed Description

Biological markers of radiation exposure play a crucial role in the triage of suspected exposed persons following a radiation accident or incident. They can also estimate individual doses that enable assessment of late radiation effects in affected individuals. In recent years the gene expression assay has been shown to be a sensitive biological marker of radiation exposure with the potential to be used for truly individualised dosimetry. The possibility for this gene expression assay to be used in a large scale mass-casualty scenario has been proposed and tested in a recent intercomparison exercise. Classic cytogenetic techniques, and in particular the gold standard dicentric assay, have two main disadvantages: (1) lack of high-throughput and (2) delays of several days between blood sampling and the availability of results. Although more work needs to be done to further assess its suitability for triage purposes, it is clear that gene expression analysis in blood samples can provide valuable information, as there is a window of time (i.e. 12-48 hours) following radiation exposure where specific radiation-responsive genes have linear dose responses (0-5 Gy). Most work to date has focused on developing sensitive assays for studying gene expression modifications using state of the art technology, i.e. multiplex quantitative, digital polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and molecular counting systems.

At Public Health England (PHE), recently established technology allows direct counting of nucleic acid molecules (DNA, mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA) without the need for enzymatic reaction or amplification steps hence reducing time for data collection. The system offers multiplexing capacity comparable to microarrays but with greater precision and sensitivity. Another unique advantage of this technology is that there is no need for long, time consuming bioinformatic analyses as the results are obtained as counted number of events. This new gene expression analysis technique has been assessed for radiation biodosimetry applications with promising results. Furthermore, gene expression has shown a high degree of promise as a marker for late effects of radiation, for instance normal tissue reactions following curative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Clinical data suggest that systemic inflammatory responses plays a critical role in the progression of radiation effects: for instance, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio represents a marker of systemic inflammation pre-treatment and is an independent prognostic factor useful for individual risk assessment in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Genes relevant to inflammatory responses are thus interesting candidates for further investigation. Linearity of the transcriptional dose-response for specific radiation-responsive genes in ex vivo exposed human blood samples has recently been demonstrated for the first time, and inter-individual variability in the response after low doses and high doses exposures has been newly assessed. The logical next stage for biological development of the gene expression assay is to validate these new techniques with human blood samples exposed to radiation in vivo.

The use of samples from patients undergoing radiotherapy for validation of techniques has been gaining popularity in recent years. Sophisticated treatment planning for clinical radiotherapy leads to very accurate individual dose calculations that allow for validation of biological estimates of dose. The range of standard radiotherapy schedules chosen for inclusion in this study will provide a wide range of doses for assessment of the gene expression assay alone and in combination with the other cytogenetic assays, to simulate a range of potential exposure scenarios.

Peripheral blood samples will be taken with informed consent from patients undergoing standard radiotherapy before and during treatment for breast, lung, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours. Responses from panels of up to 800 coding and non-coding RNAs will be assessed in the samples using the nCounter system. Candidate genes identified by PHE, Columbia and/or in the literature as being specific to radiation responses will be included, together with genes relevant to systemic inflammatory responses, to identify transcriptional responses for a range of doses and exposures on an inter-individual basis. Data will be analysed using existing and new statistical tools focused on count data modelling. The intended outcome is identification of a radiation specific panel of genes to inform individual radiation responses and if the results are favourable, a large scale follow up to this proposed pilot is expected in due course.

Conditions

Cancer

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Blood donation during radiotherapy

Participants will be asked to donate a blood sample at 5 time points before and during their radiotherapy

Blood donation during radiotherapy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Participants will be asked to donate a blood sample at 5 time points before and during their radiotherapy

Interventions

Blood donation during radiotherapy

Participants will be asked to donate a blood sample at 5 time points before and during their radiotherapy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Age ≥18 years
• Requirement for external beam radiotherapy for breast, lung, gastrointestinal or genitourinary tumours
• Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

• Previous radiotherapy
• Concurrent chemotherapy or chemotherapy preceding radiotherapy by less than 4 weeks
• Concurrent hormone therapy or hormone therapy preceding radiotherapy by less than 4 weeks

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Public Health England

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Navita Somaiah

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

Locations

The Royal Marsden

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Countries

United Kingdom

References

Lloyd, D.C. and A.A. Edwards, Biological dosimetry after radiation accidents. In: G. Obe et al.,(eds). Chromosomal Aberrations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1990.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Maznik, N.A., et al., Chromosomal dosimetry for some groups of evacuees from Prypiat and Ukrainian liquidators at Chernobyl. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1997. 74(1-2): p. 5-11.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Kabacik S, Mackay A, Tamber N, Manning G, Finnon P, Paillier F, Ashworth A, Bouffler S, Badie C. Gene expression following ionising radiation: identification of biomarkers for dose estimation and prediction of individual response. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Feb;87(2):115-29. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2010.519424. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21067298 (View on PubMed)

Manning G, Kabacik S, Finnon P, Bouffler S, Badie C. High and low dose responses of transcriptional biomarkers in ex vivo X-irradiated human blood. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013 Jul;89(7):512-22. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2013.769694. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23362884 (View on PubMed)

Kabacik S, Ortega-Molina A, Efeyan A, Finnon P, Bouffler S, Serrano M, Badie C. A minimally invasive assay for individual assessment of the ATM/CHEK2/p53 pathway activity. Cell Cycle. 2011 Apr 1;10(7):1152-61. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.7.15231. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21389785 (View on PubMed)

Badie C, Kabacik S, Balagurunathan Y, Bernard N, Brengues M, Faggioni G, Greither R, Lista F, Peinnequin A, Poyot T, Herodin F, Missel A, Terbrueggen B, Zenhausern F, Rothkamm K, Meineke V, Braselmann H, Beinke C, Abend M. Laboratory intercomparison of gene expression assays. Radiat Res. 2013 Aug;180(2):138-48. doi: 10.1667/RR3236.1. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23886340 (View on PubMed)

Ainsbury EA, Bakhanova E, Barquinero JF, Brai M, Chumak V, Correcher V, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, Gruel G, Guclu I, Horn S, Jaworska A, Kulka U, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Longo A, Marrale M, Monteiro Gil O, Oestreicher U, Pajic J, Rakic B, Romm H, Trompier F, Veronese I, Voisin P, Vral A, Whitehouse CA, Wieser A, Woda C, Wojcik A, Rothkamm K. Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Nov;147(4):573-92. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq499. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21183550 (View on PubMed)

Kabacik S, Manning G, Raffy C, Bouffler S, Badie C. Time, dose and ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) status dependency of coding and noncoding RNA expression after ionizing radiation exposure. Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;183(3):325-37. doi: 10.1667/RR13876.1. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25738893 (View on PubMed)

Manning, G., et al., Assessing a new gene expression analysis technique for radiation biodosimetry applications. Radiation Measurements, 2011. 46(9): p. 1014-1018.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Finnon P, Kabacik S, MacKay A, Raffy C, A'Hern R, Owen R, Badie C, Yarnold J, Bouffler S. Correlation of in vitro lymphocyte radiosensitivity and gene expression with late normal tissue reactions following curative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Dec;105(3):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23157981 (View on PubMed)

Krenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Stojakovic T, Pichler M, Gerger A, Kapp KS, Langsenlehner T. The elevated preoperative derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2016 Jan;37(1):361-8. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3805-4. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26219894 (View on PubMed)

Chua ML, Horn S, Somaiah N, Davies S, Gothard L, A'Hern R, Yarnold J, Rothkamm K. DNA double-strand break repair and induction of apoptosis in ex vivo irradiated blood lymphocytes in relation to late normal tissue reactions following breast radiotherapy. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2014 May;53(2):355-64. doi: 10.1007/s00411-014-0531-z. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24622963 (View on PubMed)

Chua ML, Somaiah N, A'Hern R, Davies S, Gothard L, Yarnold J, Rothkamm K. Residual DNA and chromosomal damage in ex vivo irradiated blood lymphocytes correlated with late normal tissue response to breast radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jun;99(3):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.071. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21704405 (View on PubMed)

Chua ML, Somaiah N, Bourne S, Daley F, A'hern R, Nuta O, Davies S, Herskind C, Pearson A, Warrington J, Helyer S, Owen R, Yarnold J, Rothkamm K. Inter-individual and inter-cell type variation in residual DNA damage after in vivo irradiation of human skin. Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 May 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21620495 (View on PubMed)

Prise KM, O'Sullivan JM. Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 May;9(5):351-60. doi: 10.1038/nrc2603. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19377507 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CCR4553

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id