Remote Monitoring of Patient Reported Outcomes to Improve the Efficacy of the Acute Phase Radiotherapy Review Process

NCT ID: NCT06274892

Last Updated: 2024-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-09

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a key component in the treatment of breast and prostate cancer. However, patients may experience significant side effects. Patients can accurately self-report side effects from RT and these patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can direct communication between patient and healthcare provider (HCP), and facilitate joint decision making.

Patients state that using mobile phone applications (apps) to collect PROs (mPROs) is easily incorporated into their daily routines, allowing them to engage at a time and pace that suits them. When mPRO collection is combined with remote symptom monitoring by HCPs, these systems result in improvements in symptom control and quality of life.

Currently, patients receiving RT are seen by a Radiation Oncologist once per week during RT and once every few months after RT has finished. Recent evaluations indicate that patients and physicians consider the number of visits to be too frequent during RT, and too infrequent immediately after RT. This research will use weekly mPROs (remotely monitored by RT HCP) to determine if a patient needs (or wants) to be seen by a RT HCP during and/or immediately after RT.

Using mPROs to optimize RT patient assessment processes will ensure patients are seen if and when required. For a patient, this could result in reduced time and costs at the hospital. For the physician, resources could be re-allocated to improve access to RT services. Using mPROs after RT has the potential for earlier treatment of side effects, which has been linked to improved survival and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Remote monitoring of mPROs provides a platform for near real-time monitoring and action, resulting in the systematic reporting of symptoms and the potential for earlier healthcare interventions to treat those symptoms. The use of mPRO monitoring has been linked to improved survival and quality of life in patients receiving chemotherapy. It is likely therefore, that similar benefits will be seen in RT, particularly in the period immediately after RT has finished.

In this study, the collection of mPROs will inform decision making when determining if a patient should be seen by a radiation oncologist. This will ensure patients in need of care are seen in a timely manner, if and when required. For a patient and caregiver, reduced time at the hospital leads to reduced opportunity costs (e.g. time) and out-of-pocket fees (e.g. parking). For the physician, the work time and clinic space gained from not seeing 'well' patients can be re-allocated to seeing 'unwell' patients or seeing new patient consultations to improve access to RT services. Hence, remotely monitoring mPROs to shape RT supportive care processes may reduce costs for patients and improve efficiency for physicians without a detrimental impact on quality of care.

To date, no research has evaluated the use of remote monitored mPROs to triage RT patients' supportive care, based on patient assessments of need. It is hypothesized that the use of remote mPRO monitoring will reduce the number of in-person review visits during RT and/or improve patient care immediately after RT.

Objectives: Primary) To determine if remote mPRO monitoring influences the proportion of review visits necessary during and up to 12 weeks after RT. Secondary) To determine the patient and treatment factors that influence the number and pattern of radiation HCP assessments needed during and up to 12 weeks after RT; to quantify the impact of mPRO remote monitoring on the frequency of adverse events and the use of unscheduled acute care services.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remote monitoring PROs

All participants allocated to the interventional arm will receive the RT technique, dose and fractionation according to institutional standards. Once per week, participants will use a mobile phone 'app' to enter mPROs, and indicate a need for review for any other reason. The treatment Radiation Therapists will triage the participant to either attend or skip that week's on-treatment review based on this information and established criteria. After RT completion, Advanced Practice Radiation Therapists (apRTs) will triage the participant to receive a virtual follow-up visit when necessary. Participants will be seen once by a Radiation Oncologist 4 to 12 weeks after last radiation treatment. The participants will also complete the following questionnaires: 1) Baseline (patient factors); 2) 'During treatment' (review quality); 3) 'Post acute phase' (satisfaction with care). Circle-of-care HCP will comment on the impact of the PROMOTE process on the quality of care for that participant.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remote monitoring PROs

Intervention Type OTHER

Attendance at RT review appointments triaged based on remotely monitored PROs

Standard of Care

All participants allocated to the standard of care arm will receive all RT treatment activities according to institutional standards. Participants will attend the weekly in-person review session with a Radiation Oncologist during treatment and will be seen once between 4 and 12 weeks after last RT treatment. Documentation of radiation-related toxicity will be performed by the radiation HCPs according to standard of care. Participants will be asked to complete the following study questionnaires: 1) Baseline evaluation (patient factors); 2) 'During treatment' evaluation (need/usefulness of review); 3) 'Post acute phase' evaluation (satisfaction with care).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remote monitoring PROs

Attendance at RT review appointments triaged based on remotely monitored PROs

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zamplo mobile healthcare application

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer
* About to receive a course of radical or adjuvant radiation therapy as an outpatient at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
* Able to enter PRO responses into the mobile app in English or French

Exclusion Criteria

* Significant comorbidities that would render the patient not suitable for remote monitoring
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tara Rosewall, PhD

Role: CONTACT

416 946 2000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tara Rosewall

Role: primary

4162098269

Winnie Li

Role: backup

4169462000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

23-5818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Curatively Intended Thoracic Reirradiation
NCT06950073 NOT_YET_RECRUITING