Adductor Canal Block Versus Periarticular Bupivicaine Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT02777749

Last Updated: 2019-03-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-19

Study Completion Date

2017-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of adductor canal blocks versus periarticular bupivacaine injections for pain management in total knee arthroplasty. This randomized clinical trial will compare outcomes between adductor canal blocks, periarticular bupivacaine injections, and periarticular liposomal bupivacaine injections. Results from this study will help determine the most appropriate perioperative pain management strategy for patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 600,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed each year in the United States, with expectations for greater than 4 million/year by the year 2030. Since the onset of TKAs in the 1960's, there have been developments that have improved both functionality and patient satisfaction. In the last decade, a focus has been made on multimodal pain management protocols, more rapid functional recovery, reduced length of hospital stay, and minimizing side effects of treatment while maintaining function and durability. The widespread use of regional anesthesia has led to improvements in pain control, more rapid functional recovery, and reduced length of stay. In recent years many surgeons have transitioned from femoral nerve blocks (proximal femoral nerve) to adductor canal blocks (distal femoral nerve) to maintain a sensory block for pain control, while minimizing any motor blockade that is typically seen in proximal femoral nerve blocks, which would hamper rehabilitation, and increase risk of falls. In addition to regional blocks, which are typically performed in the preoperative setting, some surgeons favor an intraoperative periarticular anesthetic injection (PAI), typically with bupivacaine or the long acting form liposomal bupivacaine, either in conjunction with an adductor canal block, or independently. In theory, PAI has the advantage of a comparable sensory nerve block as an adductor canal block, without the disadvantages and risks, which include prolonged quadriceps weakness, fall risk, and neurologic dysfunction.

The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare the efficacy of adductor canal blocks versus periarticular bupivacaine injections for pain management in total knee arthroplasty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adductor Canal Block

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine preoperatively administered by the regional pain anesthesia team in the pre-operative block area, just prior to surgery.

Adductor Canal Block (ACB)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine or 50 cc's of 0.25% short-acting bupivacaine (SB), intramuscular injection

Periarticular SB

50 cc's of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intraoperatively, just prior to wound closure, by the performing surgeon.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine or 50 cc's of 0.25% short-acting bupivacaine (SB), intramuscular injection

ACB + SB

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine preoperatively administered by the regional pain anesthesia team in the pre-operative block area, just prior to surgery.

50 cc's of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected intraoperatively, just prior to wound closure, by the performing surgeon.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine or 50 cc's of 0.25% short-acting bupivacaine (SB), intramuscular injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

15 cc's of 0.5% bupivacaine or 50 cc's of 0.25% short-acting bupivacaine (SB), intramuscular injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride Marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients undergoing an unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty under the care of the two senior arthroplasty surgeons.

Exclusion Criteria

\- Allergy to bupivicaine or liposomal bupivicaine.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeffrey Geller

Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at the Columbia University Medical Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey Geller, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11153.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23011713 (View on PubMed)

Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Advances in pain management: game changers in knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):7-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34514.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25381400 (View on PubMed)

Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1144-62. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4b18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20966667 (View on PubMed)

Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25376972 (View on PubMed)

Wang C, Cai XZ, Yan SG. Comparison of Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injection and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul;30(7):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25735501 (View on PubMed)

Schroer WC, Diesfeld PG, LeMarr AR, Morton DJ, Reedy ME. Does Extended-Release Liposomal Bupivacaine Better Control Pain Than Bupivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26117072 (View on PubMed)

Berry J. Audience response-practice norm/trends. 22nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. November 2012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAQ0850

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adductor Canal Block
NCT04513145 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Continuous Vs Single Shot Block After ACL
NCT04101682 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1