Violence Prevention for Adolescent Girls With Prior Maltreatment
NCT ID: NCT02765048
Last Updated: 2016-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
312 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-08-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Trauma Center-Based Intervention for Adolescent Traumatic Injury Survivors
NCT05086757
Prevention of Violent Behavior Among Children
NCT00056940
Girls in Transition Study: Helping Girls Enter the Teenage Years
NCT00641940
Trial of a Middle School Coach Gender Violence Prevention Program
NCT02331238
Improving Behavioral Health for Caregivers and Children After Pediatric Injury
NCT06856057
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is a clear need for intervention and prevention efforts to be directed at female survivors of child maltreatment. We are targeting our intervention/prevention efforts at girls for several empirically important reasons. Prevalence studies consistently reveal that girls are more frequent victims of childhood sexual abuse, adult sexual assault and intimate partner violence. Childhood sexual abuse in particular is more strongly correlated with the development of serious mental health and substance abuse problems than other forms of maltreatment. Girls are more vulnerable to physical and sexual re-victimization in adolescence and adulthood and re-victimization increases risks of mental health and substance abuse problems, which further increases risks for re-victimization. Research has demonstrated that girls/women are more vulnerable to the development of PTSD than boys/men even when exposed to comparable levels and types of trauma, and PTSD has been shown to increase risks for re-victimization. A growing body of literature indicates that trauma responses are mediating factors in re-victimization. Consequently, if trauma symptoms (PTSD, depression, anxiety, cognitive distortions, and maladaptive coping strategies) can be ameliorated there is greater potential to prevent revictimization.
Despite the strong empirical evidence that girls with histories of maltreatment are at greater risk than other adolescents of engaging in youth violence and interpersonal violence as adults, there are no reports of violence prevention programs tailored for female adolescents in foster care. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has identified cognitive behavior therapy as an effective treatment to reduce psychological harm among youth exposed to traumatic events and to promote healthy relationships among youths who have experienced trauma. Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy has been adapted for children exposed to community or family violence utilizing a group format and delivered in community settings. The school-based version of the intervention is known as Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in School, or CBITS. The study adapts the CBITS program for use with adolescent girls assessed or served by Children's Division (GAIN) who have experienced previous maltreatment for delivery within community-based settings, and evaluates its impact in preventing re-victimization and perpetration of interpersonal violence.
The specific aims of the study were to:
1. Adapt the CBITS program for girls who have been assessed or served by the Children's Division (GAIN) that targets mental health problems as they relate to risks of revictimization and perpetration of interpersonal violence.
2. Utilizing a randomized controlled design, implement the GAIN program with 125 adolescent girls who have been assessed or served by Children's Division compared with 125 girls who receive usual care.
3. Conduct a process evaluation that will monitor treatment integrity through ratings of session content delivered, participants' attendance, program relevance and satisfaction, and tracking comparison and experimental group adolescents to reduce study attrition.
4. Conduct an outcome evaluation to compare the effectiveness of the GAIN program on primary outcomes such as trauma-related mental health problems (i.e., PTSD, depression), aggression, and revictimization and on secondary outcomes such as self-efficacy to control anger and internalizing and externalizing behavior problems.
Experimental Group Youths who were randomly assigned to the experimental group participate in an informational interview conducted by a group therapist who is a licensed clinical psychologist, social worker, or counselor with extensive experience in treating girls with history of maltreatment. A significant adult chosen by the youth who is a foster parent, congregate care worker, Children's Division worker, or relative accompanied the adolescent to the informational interview so that the youth was more comfortable. The purpose of this informational interview was to inform the youth about the purpose of the group, to secure the youth's commitment to the group, to facilitate an initial connection between the adolescent and the therapist, and to assure that the youth is appropriate for the group (based on the inclusionary and exclusionary criteria). Once eligibility was determined, the therapist administered consent and assent forms.
The experimental condition consisted of the CBITS intervention adapted for adolescent girls who have been assessed or served by the Children's Division (GAIN). CBITS is an evidence-based, 10 session program that incorporates cognitive behavioral therapy skills in a group format to address symptoms of trauma, such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression related to exposure to violence. The adapted CBITS program included the following elements: psychoeducation related to common reactions to trauma, understanding the connection between feelings, thoughts, and behaviors, relaxation skills, cognitive therapy, trauma exposure, and social problem-solving. The program met once each week and lasted a total of 10 weeks. Each session was approximately 1.5 hours long. Each session had about 6-8 participants and was led by two group facilitators who had experience helping adolescents who had experienced trauma. Additionally, each participant attended two individual sessions with the group therapist to check in on her reaction to the group and to make a plan for her goals for the group. These individual sessions were an hour in length and occurred between weeks 2 and 6 of the group sessions. Following the completion of the GAIN intervention, therapists provided written recommendations to the legal custodians of experimental group participants. This report included recommendations for future care.
Experimental participants participated in three structured interviews: a pretest interview, a posttest after the intervention (approximately 3 months later), and a follow-up interview 6 months after baseline. The face-to-face pre, post, and follow-up interviews included an evaluation of the effectiveness of the GAIN program on primary and secondary outcomes. Mental health service utilization, medication use, and type and severity of child maltreatment were also assessed for potential control variables. Each interview lasted approximately one hour. Master's and doctoral level social work students conducted these face-to-face interviews. Prior to conducting interviews, interviewers participated in an intensive training to gain a working knowledge of the research project and learn to effectively discuss the risks and benefits of participation with the subjects.
Usual Care Participants Usual care participants received any usual services that they would receive during the course of the study. So for example, they continued to receive case management services through Children's Division as well as other therapeutic services as deemed appropriate by their Children's Division case manager.
Usual care participants also participated in the three evaluation interviews: a baseline interview, a posttest approximately 3 months later, and a follow-up interview 6 months after baseline. Each interview was conducted at the participant's residence or other convenient location and lasted approximately one hour. The interviews for the usual care group were similar to those administered to the experimental group participants. They included an assessment of the study's primary and secondary outcomes. Mental health service utilization, medication use, and type and severity of child maltreatment are also assessed for potential control variables.
Qualitative Follow-up Interviews Participants who were enrolled in the project after May 20, 2013 and who had not yet completed their participation in the study were invited to participate in a fourth 60-minute semi-structured qualitative interview. The purpose of the interview was to gain a deeper understanding of participants' intentions, attitudes and behaviors related to aggression as well as their experiences and perceptions of the intervention (experimental girls only), the study, and other mental health services that they have received. The qualitative interview was administered to participants (n=24) at the most convenient location for them, including their residence, Washington University, or at our collaborating agency (Children's Advocacy Services).
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were also conducted with caregivers of GAIN participants (n=17), professional staff who referred and/or worked with GAIN participants (n=8), and therapists who led the study's intervention groups (n=5). The purpose of these interviews was to gather more information about their perceptions of the youths' participation in GAIN and in other services.
Trained project staff who had experience in qualitative interviewing conducted the face-to-face interviews, which were recorded and transcribed without any identifying information. Audio files and transcripts were maintained on computer servers with all access being password protected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GAIN Program
Subjects randomly assigned to receive the GAIN Program intervention
GAIN Program
Receives GAIN, a 10-session program that incorporates cognitive behavioral therapy skills in a group format to address symptoms of trauma such as PTSD and depression related to histories of child maltreatment. GAIN includes the following elements: 1) assertive communication skills and relationship boundaries, 2) understanding the connection between feelings, thoughts, and behaviors, 3) increased personal confidence, 4) how to have healthy relationships and personal safety, and 5) how to cope with stress and anxiety.
Usual Care
Subjects randomly assigned to receive community-based services as part of their usual care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GAIN Program
Receives GAIN, a 10-session program that incorporates cognitive behavioral therapy skills in a group format to address symptoms of trauma such as PTSD and depression related to histories of child maltreatment. GAIN includes the following elements: 1) assertive communication skills and relationship boundaries, 2) understanding the connection between feelings, thoughts, and behaviors, 3) increased personal confidence, 4) how to have healthy relationships and personal safety, and 5) how to cope with stress and anxiety.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* prior history of maltreatment that has been formally investigated and/or assessed by Children's Division
* Youth is interested in participation and provides assent through IRB approved assent forms
* The legal custodian, parent, and Family Support Team support the youth's participation and provide consent through IRB approved consent forms
* Caregivers of GAIN participants (both experimental and usual care) and professional staff who referred and/or worked with GAIN participants
* Interested and willing to participate in a one-on-one interview
* Led the study's intervention groups with GAIN participants
* Interested and willing to participate in one-on-one interviews.
Exclusion Criteria
* actively suicidal or psychotic, as determined by standard protocol of the state
* behavior that would prohibit participation in a group setting or interview
Qualitative--
-Not interested in participating in one-on-one interviews.
-Not interested in participating in one-on-one interviews.
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division
UNKNOWN
Children's Advocacy Services of Greater St. Louis
UNKNOWN
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wendy Auslander
Barbara A. Bailey Professor of Social Work
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wendy Auslander, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Comtrea
Arnold, Missouri, United States
Children's Advocacy Services of Greater St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Auslander W, Tlapek SM, Threlfall J, Edmond T, Dunn J. Mental Health Pathways Linking Childhood Maltreatment to Interpersonal Revictimization During Adolescence for Girls in the Child Welfare System. J Interpers Violence. 2018 Apr;33(7):1169-1191. doi: 10.1177/0886260515614561. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
Auslander W, Sterzing P, Threlfall J, Gerke D, Edmond T. Childhood Abuse and Aggression in Adolescent Girls Involved in Child Welfare: The Role of Depression and Posttraumatic Stress. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2016;9:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40653-016-0090-3. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201111071
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.