Usefulness of A Scope Guide Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02739893

Last Updated: 2019-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-02-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to see if use of ScopeGuide, as compared to the traditional colonoscope, improves successful completion of colonoscopy procedures as evaluated by ease of completion, time to completion, and reduction in the number of mechanical loops and external maneuvers required to advance the scope. Other outcome measures include looking at the amount of sedation required (independent of weight) and polyp rate detection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, the standard practice consists of utilizing a traditional colonoscope and depends on manual manipulation and learned expertise of human anatomy. If the scope guide reduces the amount of external maneuvers required, this will reduce patient discomfort and may reduce sedative requirements during procedure. Reduction in mechanical loops formed while advancing the scope will reduce the amount of time per procedure and potentially increase polyp detection. Additionally, if the physician is unable to complete the procedure (as indicated by reaching the cecum (anatomical structure signifying the end of the colon), clinical data may be lost. A reduction in the number of loops formed and ease of advancing scope will facilitate completion of procedure.

The patient will not be exposed to any inconvenience, danger, or discomfort as a result of study participation. Patients undergoing colonoscopy as SOC, if enrolled into the study, will be randomized by envelope at the time of procedure. If the patient is randomized to the scope guide, the PI simply activates the guide through a mechanical button placed on the scope itself. If the patient is randomized to SOC, the physician proceeds with the colonoscopy without activating the scope guide. The same scope is used regardless of randomization result. The physician is able to turn on and off the magnetic function through the touch of a button.

The colonoscopy procedure itself is not dependent upon use of the scope guide. However, the use of the scope guide may assist the physician in performing the procedure with less physical manipulation. Without the use of the ScopeGuide, an endoscopist is able to perform the procedure based off anatomical knowledge and through the use of maneuvers such as changing the patient position and applying external pressure. This study will test if the ScopeGuide decreases the number of maneuvers required for completion. If the number of maneuvers is decreased, it is likely to decrease patient discomfort and decrease the duration of procedure. This study will also test of the ScopeGuide increases completeness of procedure.

300 patients undergoing SOC colonoscopy will be randomized 1:1 to receive traditional colonoscopy or scope guide assisted colonoscopy.

This study will assess if the scope guide assist function improves successful completion of colonoscopy, time to completion, and reduction in the number of mechanical loops and external maneuvers required to advance the scope. Polyp detection rate and amount of sedation required will also be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy, Colorectal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Scope Guide Assisted

Scope Guide Assist to be utilized during colonoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Scope Guide Assist

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Olympus has developed a new instrument which provides physicians a real-time, three dimensional visualization of position and configuration during colonoscopy. The Olympus ScopeGuide technology has received FDA clearance and can be used within the United States. The new technology called the 'scopeguide' has been developed that uses magnetic coils embedded into the scope to create a 3 D image of the shape of the entire scope inside the body that is projected onto the monitor to see. This acts as a "GPS" and shows the advancement of the scope through bends providing information on loops and thereby eliminating chances of loop formation, helping in loop reduction and also reducing the number of external maneuvers that may be required for the completion of colonoscopy.

Standard

Colonoscopy completed using current SOC without scopeguide assist.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Standard procedure for colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Scope Guide Assist

Olympus has developed a new instrument which provides physicians a real-time, three dimensional visualization of position and configuration during colonoscopy. The Olympus ScopeGuide technology has received FDA clearance and can be used within the United States. The new technology called the 'scopeguide' has been developed that uses magnetic coils embedded into the scope to create a 3 D image of the shape of the entire scope inside the body that is projected onto the monitor to see. This acts as a "GPS" and shows the advancement of the scope through bends providing information on loops and thereby eliminating chances of loop formation, helping in loop reduction and also reducing the number of external maneuvers that may be required for the completion of colonoscopy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard procedure for colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* able to safely undergo colonoscopy without history of colorectal surgery, colonic stricture or obstruction.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of colorectal surgery,
* current colonic stricture or obstruction,
* unable to safely undergo colonoscopy.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shajan P. Sugandha

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F141223002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AI Assistance in GI Endoscopy Recovery Assessment
NCT06923059 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
ColoAssist vs. MEI
NCT01895504 COMPLETED NA