The Effect of ScopeGuide on the Mental Workload of Endoscopist
NCT ID: NCT02092493
Last Updated: 2016-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Subjective mental workload (the individuals mental resources required as a result of the multiple demands placed on him/her from a task)in healthcare employees is known to be important for the performance and safety of healthcare delivery. Increased workload during task performance may increase fatigue, facilitate errors and lead to overall inferior performance.
In colonoscopy high mental workload could potentially be responsible for longer procedural time, lack of trainee learning, inadvertent missing of lesions in the bowel as well as poor technique leading to patient discomfort. The effect of the endoscopist mental workload on their performance and potential facilitators to reduce mental workload is an area that has been neglected in this field.
This study aims to look at the mental workload of endoscopist during colonoscopy and the effect ScopeGuide may have on this workload.
Hypothesis: The use of ScopeGuide during colonoscopy will reduce the mental workload of the endoscopist performing the procedure
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Usefulness of A Scope Guide Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy
NCT02739893
Magnetic Endoscope Imaging in Colonoscopy: Influence on Propofol Dosage
NCT02121704
Evaluate the Effects of An AI System on Colonoscopy Quality of Novice Endoscopists
NCT05323279
Evaluation of Handheld Colonoscopy Force Monitor by Expert Endoscopists in the Performance of Colonoscopy
NCT00797914
ScopeGuide-assisted Colonoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy
NCT01438645
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-ScopeGuide
This arm will have patients undertaking the procedure without ScopeGuide. All outcome measures will be recorded as usual
No interventions assigned to this group
ScopeGuide
Patients have their colonoscopy done with ScopeGuide
ScopeGuide
These patient will have their procedure undertake with the use of ScopeGuide, which provides a 3d configuration of the colonoscope in the patient
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ScopeGuide
These patient will have their procedure undertake with the use of ScopeGuide, which provides a 3d configuration of the colonoscope in the patient
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All adult patients attending diagnostic colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to give informed consent
* Patient preference
* Patients with new diagnosis of colonic cancer
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Imdadur Rahman, MBChB MRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Southampton
Southampton, Hamshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEI1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.