ColoAssist vs. MEI

NCT ID: NCT01895504

Last Updated: 2015-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

475 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colonoscopy aims to investigate the entire colon by advancing the colonoscope tip from the rectum to the cecum, a process called cecal intubation. Cecal intubation may be difficult for different reasons, and features of the colonoscope and the use of imaging devices may influence the success rate. We want to compare the performance of a new colonoscope with novel features including gradual stiffness with that of a colonoscope supplied with a magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) device. The hypothesis is that the performance of the new instrument is non-inferior to the MEI system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The recommended cecal intubation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is 95%. The MEI system allows real time monitoring of the colonoscope position within the colon and is considered to be a useful supplement to achieve cecal intubation. However, the MEI system is costly, and trial results are equivocal regarding the actual benefits. A newly designed colonoscope (ColoAssist) with gradual stiffness throughout the colonoscope shaft has been developed to improve insertability. We want to investigate if we can achieve equal performance results with the ColoAssist instrument as with the MEI system in CRC screening. The study is designed as a two-center, single-blinded, randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ColoAssist

Screening colonoscopy with a new colonoscope with gradual stiffness

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ColoAssist

Intervention Type DEVICE

Screening colonoscopy with the test instrument

MEI

Screening colonoscopy with colonoscopes compatible with and guided by MEI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MEI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Colonoscopy with Olympus colonoscopes and MEI guidance

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ColoAssist

Screening colonoscopy with the test instrument

Intervention Type DEVICE

MEI

Colonoscopy with Olympus colonoscopes and MEI guidance

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FujiFilm EC-590WI4 Olympus ScopeGuide

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inclusion in an ongoing colorectal cancer screening trial (NCT 00883792)

Exclusion Criteria

* Excluded from the ongoing screening trial (NCT 00883792)
* Inability or unwilling to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

66 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sorlandet Hospital HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kjetil K Garborg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SSHF Kristiansand, Norway

Michael Bretthauer, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Oslo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SSHF Arendal

Arendal, , Norway

Site Status

SSHF Kristiansand

Kristiansand, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garborg K, Wiig H, Hasund A, Matre J, Holme O, Noraberg G, Loberg M, Kalager M, Adami HO, Bretthauer M. Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):128-133. doi: 10.1177/2050640616639162. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28405331 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ColoAssist

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.