Remifentanil Only vs. Midazolam and Meperidine During Elective Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01693185
Last Updated: 2014-06-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Remifentanil as a Sole Agent or in Combination With Midazolam Versus Fentanyl/Midazolam During Sedation for Colonoscopy
NCT03037892
A Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Compared to Placebo and Midazolam in Colonoscopy Patients
NCT02290873
Compare Propofol to Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy
NCT01488045
The Efficacy of Midazolam & Ketamine Versus Midazolam & Fentanyl for Sedation in Ambulatory Colonoscopies
NCT00376831
Study of Remimazolam Tosilate in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT03779061
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting opioid, provides excellent pain control during colonoscopy and its rapid onset and offset times are advantages over other conventional opioids including meperidine, in avoiding prolonged discharge time after the colonoscopy.
A total 54 patients, aged 18-65 years in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS)1 and 2, scheduled for elective colonoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care in a University Hospital, will be recruited after obtaining written informed consent during the patients' first visit to outpatient/inpatient clinic for interview.
Predetermined patient identification numbers (PIN) and enrolment order were placed in sealed envelopes, and all patients were randomly assigned, at recruitment, to the midazolam-meperidine combination (group-MM) or remifentanil alone (group-R). If a patient was excluded during the study, the following patient assumed the status of the excluded patient.
Patients are allocated into one of two groups, Group 1 and Group 2 (27 patients each) according to the PIN at the recruitment.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: refusal or inability to provide written informed consent, age \<19 years, pregnancy, previous history of large bowel surgery, a psychiatric disorder, an addictions to opiates or sedatives, a previous history of adverse events to any drug used in the present study, and performance of any additional diagnostic procedure after completion of colonoscopy.
All colonoscopic procedure is going to be performed by one Gastroenterologist (endoscopist).
On arriving in the endoscopy room, supplemental oxygen (2 L/min) was given through the mouth and both nostrils via a specially designed nasal prong which could monitor the end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) level.
Before drug administration, the basal values of mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-expiratory CO2 level (ETCO2), and the bispectral index (BIS), were recorded by a single observer, who also monitored these values every 5 min during entire colonoscopy procedures.
Supplemental oxygen (3 L/min) is given through nasal prong with capnography transducer in all patients.
Two min before the colonoscopy procedure, a bolus midazolam of 0.03 mg/kg with a bolus meperidine of 1.0 mg/kg are given intravenously over 60 sec in Group 1 or those of comparable amount of diluted remifentanil 0.4 mcg/kg are given in Group 2 at the colonoscopy room, and a continuous infusion of diluted remifentanil of 0.04 mcg/kg/min is followed in Group 2 or that of comparable amount of normal saline (placebo) is followed in Group 1.
The patients are asked to rate the degree of pain and distress (reverse satisfaction) by a 100 mm Visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 = minimum, 100 = maximum) just after passing the scope, during the scope, just after the completion of the colonoscopy and at the discharge from the recovery unit.
After colonoscopy, the patients are transferred to the recovery unit and evaluated every 5 min until ready for discharge from the 30 min stay in the recovery unit.
The patients are considered recovered if when they achieved an Aldrete score of 10 (Aldrete JA , Kroulik D . A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924 - 34), have stable vital signs, are able to tolerate oral fluids, have no nausea, vomiting, or itching, and can walk unaided.
Assessment of readiness to ambulate is made by a blinded observer who remained with the patient for the duration of recovery unit stay.
The observer is instructed that the patients are required to walk as if they were leaving the recovery unit unescorted.
Aldrete score, patient pain and satisfaction (distress score) were determined every 5 min during colonoscopy and after colonoscopy up to 30 min. Time for achieving Aldrete score 10, patient's degree of pain, patient's satisfaction during and after colonoscopy, patient's ability to recall the explanations and instructions given during and before colonoscopy are determined and compared.
Aldrete score Respiration: Able to take deep breath and cough = 2, Dyspnea/shallow breathing = 1, Apnea = 0 O2 saturation: Maintains \> 92% on room air =2, Needs O2 inhalation to maintain O2 saturation \> 90% =1 , O2 saturation \< 90% even with supplemental oxygen =0 Consciousness: Fully awake= 2, Arousable on calling = 1, Not responding = 0 Circulation: BP +/- 20 mm Hg preop =2, BP +/- 20-50 mm Hg preop =1, BP +/- 50 mm Hg preop =0 Activity: Able to move 4 extremities = 2, Able to move 2 extremities = 1, Able to move 0 extremities = 0
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remifentanil
remifentanil of 0.04 mcg/kg/min with placebo (for midazolam) and placebo (for meperidine)
Remifentanil
continuous infusion 0.4 mcg/kg/min
placebo (for midazolam)
normal saline mimic to midazolam injection
placebo (for meperidine)
normal saline mimic meperidine injection
midazolam and meperidine
a bolus midazolam of 0.03 mg/kg a bolus meperidine of 1.0 mg/kg placebo (for remifentanil)
Midazolam
bolus injection
Meperidine
bolus injection for 30 sec 1.0 mg/kg
placebo (for remifentanil)
normal saline mimic diluted remifentanil
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
continuous infusion 0.4 mcg/kg/min
Midazolam
bolus injection
Meperidine
bolus injection for 30 sec 1.0 mg/kg
placebo (for remifentanil)
normal saline mimic diluted remifentanil
placebo (for midazolam)
normal saline mimic to midazolam injection
placebo (for meperidine)
normal saline mimic meperidine injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) 1-2
* Patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care in a University Hospital
* Patients who signed on written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Previous large bowel surgery
* Psychiatric disorders
* History of addiction to opiates and / or sedatives, and previous adverse reaction to any drug used in the study.
19 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Konkuk University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tae-Yop Kim, MD PhD
Professor of Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Konkuk University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KUH1160048
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.