Remifentanil Only vs. Midazolam and Meperidine During Elective Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT01693185

Last Updated: 2014-06-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study is to compare patient's recovery times after elective colonoscopy employing remifentanil only vs conventional combination of midazolam and meperidine

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A regimen with combined administration of midazolam and meperidine has been widely used and provides quite satisfactory sedation as well as analgesia during colonoscopy. However, the relatively long duration of midazolam and meperidine often prolongs the recovery time after colonoscopy and delays discharge time. (Reimann FM , Samson U , Derad I et al. Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies . Endoscopy 2000 ; 32 : 239 - 44).

Remifentanil, an ultra-short-acting opioid, provides excellent pain control during colonoscopy and its rapid onset and offset times are advantages over other conventional opioids including meperidine, in avoiding prolonged discharge time after the colonoscopy.

A total 54 patients, aged 18-65 years in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS)1 and 2, scheduled for elective colonoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care in a University Hospital, will be recruited after obtaining written informed consent during the patients' first visit to outpatient/inpatient clinic for interview.

Predetermined patient identification numbers (PIN) and enrolment order were placed in sealed envelopes, and all patients were randomly assigned, at recruitment, to the midazolam-meperidine combination (group-MM) or remifentanil alone (group-R). If a patient was excluded during the study, the following patient assumed the status of the excluded patient.

Patients are allocated into one of two groups, Group 1 and Group 2 (27 patients each) according to the PIN at the recruitment.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: refusal or inability to provide written informed consent, age \<19 years, pregnancy, previous history of large bowel surgery, a psychiatric disorder, an addictions to opiates or sedatives, a previous history of adverse events to any drug used in the present study, and performance of any additional diagnostic procedure after completion of colonoscopy.

All colonoscopic procedure is going to be performed by one Gastroenterologist (endoscopist).

On arriving in the endoscopy room, supplemental oxygen (2 L/min) was given through the mouth and both nostrils via a specially designed nasal prong which could monitor the end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) level.

Before drug administration, the basal values of mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), end-expiratory CO2 level (ETCO2), and the bispectral index (BIS), were recorded by a single observer, who also monitored these values every 5 min during entire colonoscopy procedures.

Supplemental oxygen (3 L/min) is given through nasal prong with capnography transducer in all patients.

Two min before the colonoscopy procedure, a bolus midazolam of 0.03 mg/kg with a bolus meperidine of 1.0 mg/kg are given intravenously over 60 sec in Group 1 or those of comparable amount of diluted remifentanil 0.4 mcg/kg are given in Group 2 at the colonoscopy room, and a continuous infusion of diluted remifentanil of 0.04 mcg/kg/min is followed in Group 2 or that of comparable amount of normal saline (placebo) is followed in Group 1.

The patients are asked to rate the degree of pain and distress (reverse satisfaction) by a 100 mm Visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 = minimum, 100 = maximum) just after passing the scope, during the scope, just after the completion of the colonoscopy and at the discharge from the recovery unit.

After colonoscopy, the patients are transferred to the recovery unit and evaluated every 5 min until ready for discharge from the 30 min stay in the recovery unit.

The patients are considered recovered if when they achieved an Aldrete score of 10 (Aldrete JA , Kroulik D . A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924 - 34), have stable vital signs, are able to tolerate oral fluids, have no nausea, vomiting, or itching, and can walk unaided.

Assessment of readiness to ambulate is made by a blinded observer who remained with the patient for the duration of recovery unit stay.

The observer is instructed that the patients are required to walk as if they were leaving the recovery unit unescorted.

Aldrete score, patient pain and satisfaction (distress score) were determined every 5 min during colonoscopy and after colonoscopy up to 30 min. Time for achieving Aldrete score 10, patient's degree of pain, patient's satisfaction during and after colonoscopy, patient's ability to recall the explanations and instructions given during and before colonoscopy are determined and compared.

Aldrete score Respiration: Able to take deep breath and cough = 2, Dyspnea/shallow breathing = 1, Apnea = 0 O2 saturation: Maintains \> 92% on room air =2, Needs O2 inhalation to maintain O2 saturation \> 90% =1 , O2 saturation \< 90% even with supplemental oxygen =0 Consciousness: Fully awake= 2, Arousable on calling = 1, Not responding = 0 Circulation: BP +/- 20 mm Hg preop =2, BP +/- 20-50 mm Hg preop =1, BP +/- 50 mm Hg preop =0 Activity: Able to move 4 extremities = 2, Able to move 2 extremities = 1, Able to move 0 extremities = 0

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diagnostic Colonoscopy Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remifentanil

remifentanil of 0.04 mcg/kg/min with placebo (for midazolam) and placebo (for meperidine)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

continuous infusion 0.4 mcg/kg/min

placebo (for midazolam)

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline mimic to midazolam injection

placebo (for meperidine)

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline mimic meperidine injection

midazolam and meperidine

a bolus midazolam of 0.03 mg/kg a bolus meperidine of 1.0 mg/kg placebo (for remifentanil)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

bolus injection

Meperidine

Intervention Type DRUG

bolus injection for 30 sec 1.0 mg/kg

placebo (for remifentanil)

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline mimic diluted remifentanil

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remifentanil

continuous infusion 0.4 mcg/kg/min

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

bolus injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Meperidine

bolus injection for 30 sec 1.0 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (for remifentanil)

normal saline mimic diluted remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (for midazolam)

normal saline mimic to midazolam injection

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (for meperidine)

normal saline mimic meperidine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultiva dormicum Pethidine Injection normal saline normal saline normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 19-65 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) 1-2
* Patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy under Monitored Anesthesia Care in a University Hospital
* Patients who signed on written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Pregnancy
* Previous large bowel surgery
* Psychiatric disorders
* History of addiction to opiates and / or sedatives, and previous adverse reaction to any drug used in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Konkuk University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tae-Yop Kim, MD PhD

Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Konkuk University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Konkuk University Medical Center

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KUH1160048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety Study of Colonoscopy Under Sedation
NCT00930358 TERMINATED PHASE4
Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy
NCT04807101 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1