Multiple Dose Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CNS 7056 Versus Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01145222
Last Updated: 2019-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-05-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Trial of Diphenhydramine Versus Continued Midazolam in "Difficult-to-sedate" Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT01769586
Study of Remimazolam Tosilate in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT03779061
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy for Different Sedation Regimens During Colonoscopy
NCT06763705
The Effectiveness of Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy Treatment of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04906317
Sedation Regimens in GI Endoscopy
NCT04807101
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Safety assessment will include physical examinations, vital signs, ECGs, pulse oximetry measurements, capnography, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, routine drug and ethanol screening, urinalysis, pregnancy test, pain on injection using a verbal scale, and monitoring of adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
Initial 8 mg iv for sedation induction, and 3 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance.
Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
A. CNS 7056
Initial low dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
B. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
Initial 7 mg iv for sedation induction, and 2 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance.
Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
B. CNS 7056
Initial intermediate dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
C. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
Initial 5 mg iv for sedation induction, and 3 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance.
Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
C. CNS 7056
Initial high dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
D. Midazolam
Initial 2.5 mg iv for sedation induction, and 1 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance.
Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses
D. Midazolam
Initial standardized dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A. CNS 7056
Initial low dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
B. CNS 7056
Initial intermediate dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
C. CNS 7056
Initial high dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
D. Midazolam
Initial standardized dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score I, II, or III.
* Weight range 55 to 130 kg inclusive.
* Body mass index (BMI) range 18 to 33 kg/m2 inclusive
* Patients of child-bearing potential and their partners must have been willing to use adequate contraception such as an intrauterine device, diaphragm or condom during the study and until 1 month after the last study drug administration. Childbearing potential was defined as "all patients unless they were a female post menopausal for at least 2 years, or were surgically sterile."
* Patient voluntarily signed and dated an ICF that was approved by an IRB prior to the conduct of any study procedure.
* Patient was willing and able to comply with study requirements and return for a Follow up Visit (Day 4 ± 3 day) after the colonoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a suspected or diagnosed pathology of the lower GI tract that would have added to the risk of colonoscopy, such as strictures, active inflammatory bowel disease.
* ASA III patients with history of sleep apnea.
* ASA III patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2).
* Patients with evidence of uncontrolled renal, hepatic, central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular or metabolic dysfunction, or other clinically significant (CS) findings at screening that, in the investigator's or medical monitor's opinion, should have excluded them from the study.
* Patients with clinically significant abnormalities in 12 lead ECG recorded at screening.
* Female patients with a positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) pregnancy test at screening or baseline.
* Lactating female patients.
* Patients with positive drugs of abuse screen at baseline.
* Patients with positive serum ethanol at baseline.
* Patient with a history of drug or ethanol abuse.
* Patients in receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days or less than 7 half lives (whichever was longer) before the start of the study, or scheduled to receive one during the study period.
* Patients with a known sensitivity to benzodiazepines, flumazenil, opioids, naloxone, or a medical condition such that these agents were contraindicated.
* Patients with an inability to communicate well with the investigator.
* Patients in whom management of airway was judged to be difficult due to, e.g., thyro-mental distance ≤ 4 cm ("short neck"), or Mallampati score of 4.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Premier Research Group plc
UNKNOWN
Paion UK Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helen Keller Hospital
Sheffield, Alabama, United States
HOPE Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
ACRI Phase I LLC
Anaheim, California, United States
Advanced Clinical Research Associates
Anaheim, California, United States
Miami Research Associates
South Miami, Florida, United States
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Wake Research Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Options Health Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Charlottesville Medical Research
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.062. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CNS 7056-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.