Effectiveness of a Pressure Indicator Guided and a Conventional Bandaging in Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcer

NCT ID: NCT02729688

Last Updated: 2018-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective of this study are to compare the interface pressure by applying ordinary elastic bandage (OEB) and CPG-EB. In addition, investigators compared the percentage of patients who could apply the optimal pressure with OEB and CPG-EB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For treatment of venous ulcer, it was shown that compression bandaging of 35-45 mmHg sub-bandage pressure at the ankle was shown in several studies to be safe and effective.The efficacy of compression bandage considerably depends on the applied pressure and it is therefore largely dependent on the individual applying bandages. The lower pressure leads to treatment failure while the higher pressure leads to skin complication.

The use of objective devices to proof that the bandage is sufficiently applied is not available for every patients. To help the patients to apply the bandage with optimal pressure, investigators developed the customized pressure guide elastic bandage (CPG-EB) by using sub-bandage pressure guidance.

Objective of this study are to compare the interface pressure by applying ordinary elastic bandage (OEB) and CPG-EB. In addition,investigators compared the percentage of inexperienced staffs who could apply the optimal pressure with OEB and CPG-EB.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ordinary elastic bandage

Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three ordinary elastic bandages were applied with 50 % stretching and 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ordinary elastic bandage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three ordinary elastic bandages were applied with 50 % stretching and 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

customized pressure guide bandage

Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three customized pressure guide elastic bandage were applied by stretching until the elliptical shape marker in the bandage turned into circular shape with 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

customized pressure guide bandage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Investigators developed the customized pressure guide elastic bandage (CPG-EB). The experienced nurse applied the elastic bandages to each patient with sub bandage pressure monitoring. The target pressure was 35-45 mmHg. Measurements of the pressure applied by bandages was performed at point B1 corresponding to the height where the Achilles' tendon turns into the gastrocnemius muscle with Picopress (MicroLAB Elettronica, Ponte S. Nicolo, Italy). If the target pressure 35-45 mmHg was achieved, the circular ink stamp was applied into the entire bandages. The markers in CPG-EB had elliptical shape when they were not stretched. They turned into circular shape when they were stretched.

For the OEB, Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three EB were applied with 50 % stretching and 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

customized pressure guide bandage

Investigators developed the customized pressure guide elastic bandage (CPG-EB). The experienced nurse applied the elastic bandages to each patient with sub bandage pressure monitoring. The target pressure was 35-45 mmHg. Measurements of the pressure applied by bandages was performed at point B1 corresponding to the height where the Achilles' tendon turns into the gastrocnemius muscle with Picopress (MicroLAB Elettronica, Ponte S. Nicolo, Italy). If the target pressure 35-45 mmHg was achieved, the circular ink stamp was applied into the entire bandages. The markers in CPG-EB had elliptical shape when they were not stretched. They turned into circular shape when they were stretched.

For the OEB, Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three EB were applied with 50 % stretching and 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ordinary elastic bandage

Bandaging was applied by spiral methods. Three ordinary elastic bandages were applied with 50 % stretching and 50% overlapping from foot to just below knee level.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with chronic venous insufficiency CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic) C4,C5 and C6

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who can not perform bandaging by themselves
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nuttawut Sermsathanasawadi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mahidol University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vascular Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sermsathanasawadi N, Tarapongpun T, Pianchareonsin R, Puangpunngam N, Wongwanit C, Chinsakchai K, Mutirangura P, Ruangsetakit C. Customizing elastic pressure bandages for reuse to a predetermined, sub-bandage pressure: A randomized controlled trial. Phlebology. 2018 Oct;33(9):627-635. doi: 10.1177/0268355517746434. Epub 2017 Dec 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29277134 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIRIRAJ016/2559

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Compression Device Safety Study
NCT00732823 COMPLETED PHASE2
Venous Occlusion and Limb Swelling
NCT02241343 TERMINATED NA