Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Image Quality in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT ID: NCT02726594
Last Updated: 2016-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-08-31
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimization of the Acquisition Sequence to Improve the Quality and Comfort of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Exam
NCT04645628
Assessment of Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Post-Processing Procedures
NCT03490656
NMR Scanning on Patients
NCT00001194
Magnetization Transfer Quantitation and Characterization for Clinical Scanners
NCT00001714
Feasibility Testing of 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT05992298
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Motivation: At the University Hospital Zurich (USZ) a total of 10, partly very different MR scanners, are available for clinical imaging. These devices differ by the manufacturer and by the different design of the premises, the equipment, the coil and the table sizes, the logs up to the generated in the examination volume and the room temperature. For example, one of the existing examination rooms at the USZ has been equipped by a manufacturer with a costly patient comfort package. This room serves as a showroom and as a positive example for maximum patient comfort. Our experience shows that, overall, all the MRI scans of all units and the resulting image quality fluctuates greatly and the Patient Feedback for the individual studies is partly quite negative. Improved study conditions are therefore accessible both in terms of patient comfort and improved diagnostic accuracy, our goal.
Current status of research: The working group "Research in Musculoskeletal Radiology" at the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at the University Hospital Zurich is led by PhD Dr. med. Gustav Andreisek and under his authority already carried out successfully numerous projects in the field of magnetic resonance imaging.
Objectives: The aim of this prospective monocentric study is to evaluate the patient comfort in MRI and to measure examination conditions and factors that may affect the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose a total of 1000 participants enrolled in the study, consisting of healthy volunteers (N = 300) as well as patients (N = 700), which are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan. In this study, individual regions of the body are studied by MRI (for example, knee, ankle, head or spine). For all participants in the study, the investigation for each region examined is exactly the same except that a single external factor is changed or is different. Such variable factors may include: the tube diameter of the magnet, weight of the coil, which is closely attached to the examined area of the body, the height adjustment of the table on which the participants lie, the duration of the study protocol and the generated volume during the investigation. Participants are involuntarily subjected to the particular MRI scanner and setting by availability of USZ Radiology disposition. For the evaluation of the data, participants will be matched in terms of the body regions being examined and based on being part of the patient or subject group. Due to the fine different experimental conditions, the influence of these factors on study patient comfort, as wells as the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy will investigated. By this approach, the relevant factors will be examined in isolation. Only by exploring the patient's perception/comfort during an MRI scan, the patient-orientated design of the study conditions can be improved and thus the possibilities of modern MRI technology can be fully utilized in clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
For the present study, patients who are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan, as well as healthy subjects will be included. Healthy volunteers will be recruited through public notices (flyer) (mainly in the district of the University Zurich / USZ). For all patients, the duration of clinical MRI routine examination is 30-90 minutes, depending on the requirements to answer the clinical question. The subjects are interviewed after the MRI scan by a visual analog scale oral and written on various aspects of their perception during the examination. This means an additional expenditure of time of about 10 minutes. The patients arises except for this additional time not a disadvantage by taking part in the study.
No interventions assigned to this group
Subjects
For the present study, patients who are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan, as well as healthy subjects will be included. Healthy volunteers will be recruited through public notices (flyer) (mainly in the district ETH / USZ). For all patients, the duration of clinical MRI routine examination is 30-90 minutes, depending on the requirements to answer the clinical question. The subjects are interviewed after the MRI scan by a visual analog scale oral and written on various aspects of their perception during the examination. This means an additional expenditure of time of about 10 minutes. The patients arises except for this additional time not a disadvantage by taking part in the study.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age ≥ 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* A pregnancy constitutes an exclusion criterion. If there could be a potentially pregnancy, a pregnancy test will be performed
* claustrophobia
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gustav Andreisek
PD Dr. med.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gustav Andreisek, PD Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zurich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KEK-ZH-Nr. 2015-0081
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.