Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2017-01-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Analysis of Dermabond vs. Non-Absorbable Sutures in Skin Closure for Brow Ptosis Procedures
NCT05981443
Using a Novel Skin Tag Removal Device
NCT06463613
Comparison of Skinlink With Suture for ED Patients
NCT02333877
A Post-Market Study of BandGrip in Traumatic Wound Closure Compared to Suture
NCT03628690
Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children
NCT04557761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While the device presents ergonomic advantages during minimally invasive cardiac surgery, it enjoys widespread use in sternotomy-based, standard heart surgery. The relative cost of the device as a function of time saved has not been assessed. The purpose of this trial is to determine the relative time savings and cost of COR-KNOT compared to standard hand-tied knots in patients undergoing mitral/tricuspid ring annuloplasty repairs via traditional open heart surgery. Valve repair surgery is a common setting for COR-KNOT use and therefore serves as an appropriate procedure for evaluation of the technology.
The investigators propose a prospective, randomized trial in patients undergoing mitral or tricuspid ring annuloplasty repair to 1) Determine the time require per knot for COR-KNOT versus standard hand-tied knots and 2) Quantify the relative cost of COR-KNOT versus that of standard, hand-tied knots. Data from this study will enable the investigators to determine the cost-benefit of using COR-KNOT technology in cardiac surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
COR-KNOT
The COR-KNOT device was developed to make suture fixation faster and save operative time. With a single squeeze of the lever, the device remotely and automatically secures sutures with a titanium fastener, while also simultaneously trimming excess suture tails.
COR-KNOT
The COR-KNOT device was developed to make suture fixation faster and save operative time. With a single squeeze of the lever, the device remotely and automatically secures sutures with a titanium fastener, while also simultaneously trimming excess suture tails.
Standard Suture Tying
Standard Suture Tying
Standard Suture Tying
Standard Suture Tying
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
COR-KNOT
The COR-KNOT device was developed to make suture fixation faster and save operative time. With a single squeeze of the lever, the device remotely and automatically secures sutures with a titanium fastener, while also simultaneously trimming excess suture tails.
Standard Suture Tying
Standard Suture Tying
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years
* Able and willing to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Gillinov, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc A Gillinov, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-159
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.