The Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology Registry on Percutaneous Aortic Valve
NCT ID: NCT02713932
Last Updated: 2016-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hydra Registry - Italy Experience
NCT05956652
Aortic-Stent-Register
NCT01197651
TRAns-Femoral Access Intravascular Lithotripsy Comparison With PTA in TAVI
NCT05873842
Silver Acetate and Triclosan Antimicrobial Graft Evaluation for Surgical Repair of Aortic Disease
NCT04557254
The Leipzig TAVI Registry
NCT05015452
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The gold standard therapy, with improved survival, for severe aortic stenosis is the surgical aortic valve replacement with mechanical or biological prosthesis. Cardiac surgery is therapy of choice for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction or when symptomatic for lipothymia or syncope, angina pectoris, heart failure.
Criteria for high surgical risk are: left ventricular failure, coronary artery disease, previous cardiac surgery for coronary artery bypass , chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or advanced age and comorbidity , which can be a contraindication to intervention. Frequently cardiac surgery is not performed in elderly patients for the high surgery risk. In the Euro Heart Survey up to 33% of patients with single valve disease, New York Heart Association class III or IV, were not operated for concomitant disease or reduced life expectancy.
The need to provide a therapeutic option for patients considered at high surgery risk, has stimulated the development of prosthetic valve implantable with a percutaneous transcatheter techniques. The percutaneous treatment of valvular aortic stenosis has potential advantages in terms of reduction of hospitalization of elderly patients with high risk of peri-operative mortality and morbidity, as well as avoiding treatment with oral anticoagulants. The experience up to now is very positive, with immediate favorable results in terms of hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Since the procedure is at initial stage of clinical application, it becomes necessary a uniform and standardized data collection to assess the effectiveness of the procedure, the incidence of acute and late complications, and the performance of the biological valve prosthesis.
The investigators propose the establishment of an observational registry of percutaneous aortic valve replacement performed in the Italian Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
The objectives are:
* Record the clinical criteria used to asses indication for percutaneous aortic valve replacement in different centers
* Record the anatomical and morphological criteria of vascular access and thoraco abdominal aorta, evaluated with noninvasive and invasive diagnostic tests (echocardiography, multislice angiographic computed tomography, aortography) in particular calcification and tortuosity of aorto-iliac-femoral axis, degree of calcifications of the aortic valve and thoracic aortic wall calcifications.
* Record the types of devices used for percutaneous aortic valve replacement
* Observe different way of procedure (type of access, anesthetic protocols, procedural delay, aortic valvuloplasty, and so forth)
* Follow the procedure-related complications and / or of prosthesis implantation.
* Acute complications:
* Cerebral ischemia
* Arrhythmias
* Pericardial effusion / cardiac tamponade
* Aortic valve insufficiency
* Periprosthesis insufficiency
* Myocardial ischemia
* Kidney diseases
* Conversion to cardiac surgery
* Complications related to arterial vascular access
* Late complications
* Residual aortic valve insufficiency
* Arrhythmias with need of pacemaker
* Coronary Ischemia
* Kidney diseases
* Endocarditis
* Post Procedure hospital stay
* Evaluate the results at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow up:
* echocardiographic mean transvalvular aortic gradient
* valvular and/or periprosthesis insufficiency
* left ventricular ejection fraction
* Evaluate the clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of follow up
* New York Heart Association functional class
* Medical therapy for heart failure
* Number of hospitalization for heart failure
Information obtained will be analyzed and used to standardize and make more appropriate indications for percutaneous aortic valve replacement to improve and standardize the protocols of procedure, to assess the immediate and long-term effectiveness of the technique, to monitor acute and late complications related and especially to verify the performance of tissue valves in the medium to long term.
The hemodynamics centers wishing to join the register will send a completed form to the steering committee. Once registered they will receive an identification code and pass word for recording data.
Registration of patients that underwent percutaneous aortic valve replacement with prosthetic heart valves with the CE mark, consecutively enrolled during period of 24 months.
Use of paper and electronic case report forms, divided into 4 parts:
I. Personal details, medical history, clinical assessment / Instrumental II. procedure III. Post-procedure hospital stay (24 hours, 48 hours, discharge) IV. Follow up to 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
The data will be compiled and analyzed on a quarterly basis and discussed with the participating centers with semi-annual meetings
Primary end-points will be:
1. Feasibility of the procedure (functioning of the device, procedural success)
2. Access through the stenotic native aortic valve
3. Effectiveness of the positioning of the valve
4. Removal of the transport system
5. Procedural success will be determined by the efficacy of the valve system with a reduction of the gradient, and no hemodynamically significant valvular regurgitation, as assessed by angiography and color Doppler echocardiography
6. Major intraprocedural adverse events at 30 days, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
1. Major arrhythmias
2. Myocardial infarction,
3. Cardiac tamponade
4. Malfunctioning valve
5. Emergency surgical aortic valve replacement
6. Emergency aorto-coronary bypass or percutaneous coronary angioplasty
7. Cardiogenic shock
8. Infective endocarditis
9. Stroke or transient ischemic attacks
10. Aortic dissection
11. Dissection of the peripheral vessel
12. Vascular perforation
13. Acute occlusion of the artery access
14. Major bleeding
15. Death
7. New York Heart Association functional class at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
8. Left ventricle ejection fraction measured by echocardiography at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
9. Valve functioning: valve area, residual mean gradient, aortic regurgitation assessed with color Doppler echocardiography at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
10. Incidence of paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
11. Incidence of infective endocarditis at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
12. Incidence of vascular complications needs surgery
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luca Testa
Consultant Cardiologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS San Donato
San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Navarese EP, Zhang Z, Kubica J, Andreotti F, Farinaccio A, Bartorelli AL, Bedogni F, Rupji M, Tomai F, Giordano A, Reimers B, Spaccarotella C, Wilczek K, Stepinska J, Witkowski A, Grygier M, Kukulski T, Wanha W, Wojakowski W, Lesiak M, Dudek D, Zembala MO, Berti S; a Joint Effort of the Italian and Polish Cardiac Interventional Societies. Development and Validation of a Practical Model to Identify Patients at Risk of Bleeding After TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 14;14(11):1196-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.024.
Berti S, Bedogni F, Giordano A, Petronio AS, Iadanza A, Bartorelli AL, Reimers B, Spaccarotella C, Trani C, Attisano T, Marella Cenname A, Sardella G, Bonmassari R, Medda M, Tomai F, Tarantini G, Navarese EP; Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology-GISEdagger. Efficacy and Safety of ProGlide Versus Prostar XL Vascular Closure Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The RISPEVA Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 3;9(21):e018042. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018042. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
84/2010/VE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.