Randomized Sizing and Hemodynamic Study Mitroflow vs. Magna

NCT ID: NCT00705913

Last Updated: 2012-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

368 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare sizing,implant techniques, and hemodynamics between the Mitroflow Pericardial Aortic Valve and the Edwards Magna Heart Valve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comparisons of valve types are often made according to labeled valve sizes. There is growing evidence that in the majority of cases the actual sizer and valve dimensions vary from the labeled diameters, which may not be related to any hemodynamically meaningful dimension. The disagreement between the true valve dimensions and the labeled valve size may render comparisons based on labeled size meaningless

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Heart Valve (CarboMedics)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Heart Valve (CarboMedics)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study to compare sizing, implant techniques and hemodynamics of the Mitroflow Pericardial valve as compared to the Edwards Magna valve

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carpentier-Edwards Magna Tissue Valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Study to compare sizing, implant techniques and hemodynamics of the Mitroflow Valve as compared to the Edwards Magna valve

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Heart Valve (CarboMedics)

Study to compare sizing, implant techniques and hemodynamics of the Mitroflow Pericardial valve as compared to the Edwards Magna valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Carpentier-Edwards Magna Tissue Valve

Study to compare sizing, implant techniques and hemodynamics of the Mitroflow Valve as compared to the Edwards Magna valve

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are indicated for implant with a bioprosthetic valve in the aortic position according to the current practice for valve selection at the center.

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years of age
* Emergency Surgery
* Pre-existing valve prothesis in the aortic position
* Aortic root replacements or enlargements
* Active endocarditis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sorin Group USA, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sharp Memorial Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Pepin Heart Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Peninsula Regional Medical Center

Salisbury, Maryland, United States

Site Status

St. John's Medical Research Inst.

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University Hospital

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

St.Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Laval

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MRVSS-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.