Balloon vs. Self Expanding Transcatheter Valve for Degenerated Bioprosthesis

NCT ID: NCT04843072

Last Updated: 2022-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) serves a growing spectrum of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). Approximately 80% of surgical aortic valve replacements is performed using a bioprosthesis1. Durability of surgical bioprostheses varies based on the patient's age at the moment of implantation, type and size etc2. TAVI has become the preferred treatment for degenerated aortic bioprostheses in elderly patients3. The median time since index surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and for bioprosthetic valve degeneration is typically 8 - 10 years4-6. TAVI in this setting has proven to have equally favorable results as in native aortic valves7. Balloon expandable8 and self-expanding9 transcatheter heart valves (THV) can be used in a degenerated bioprosthesis and each have specific assets and limitations. TAVI in a failed bioprosthesis can cause coronary obstruction, THV migration, paravalvular leakage and prosthesis patient mismatch. The SAPIEN-3 / Ultra and EVOLUT R/Pro are the 2 most commonly used THV platforms in contemporary clinical practice including treatment of failing surgical aortic bioprostheses.

Objective: To compare TAVI with EVOLUT R/Pro vs. SAPIEN-3 / Ultra in terms of device success.

Study design: International multi-center randomized study with 1:1 randomization to TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/Pro.

Study population: 440 patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis (aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation) and selected for transfemoral TAVI by heart-team consensus.

Investigational intervention: Transfemoral TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/PRO

Main study parameters/endpoints:

1. Primary endpoint is device success at 30 days

Defined by
* Absence of procedural mortality AND
* Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND
* Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no severe prosthesis- patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation). Severe prosthesis patient mismatch is defined by effective orifice area (EOAi) ≤0.65 cm2/m2
2. Safety endpoint at 1 year defined by the composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure or valve related problems.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Valve Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evolut R/Pro bioprosthesis

Study subjects will receive a self-expanding-valve (either the Evolut R or PRO device)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolut R/PRO bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

To compare Evolut R/PRO versus Sapien S3/Ultra in failing surgical bioprostheses

Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis

Study subjects will receive a balloon-expanding-valve (either the Edwards Sapien S3 or Ultra)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Evolut R/PRO bioprosthesis

To compare Evolut R/PRO versus Sapien S3/Ultra in failing surgical bioprostheses

Intervention Type DEVICE

Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis

Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years
* Failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis requiring valve replacement and eligible for transfemoral TAVI with balloon expandable or self-expanding platform per heart team consensus based on multi-modality imaging assessment (including echocardiography and multidetector CT).
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Not eligible for Transfemoral TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra and Evolut R/Pro
* Multi-valve defects requiring intervention
* Clinically unstable and/or inotropic/vasopressor /mechanical support.
* Known mural thrombus in the left ventricle
* Presence of a mechanical aortic valve
* History of recent (within 1 month) stroke or TIA
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolas van Mieghem

Prof. dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas Van Mieghem, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Centre

Rutger-Jan Nuis, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars Sinai

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Vienna General Hospital

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

St Paul's and Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, , Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Institut Cœur Poumon

Lille, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Medical Center Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

University Hospital Mainz

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece

Athens, , Greece

Site Status RECRUITING

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Fondazione Poliambulanza Institute, Brescia, Italy

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

University Hospital of Padova

Padua, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Erasmus Medical Centre

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Inselspital, University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Leeds Teaching Hospitals

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Canada Denmark France Germany Greece Italy Netherlands Portugal Switzerland United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rutger-Jan Nuis, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31614858291

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Raj Makkar, MD

Role: primary

Christian Hengstenberg, MD, PhD

Role: primary

John Webb, MD

Role: primary

Lars Sondergaard, MD

Role: primary

Eric Van Belle, MD

Role: primary

Verena Veulemans, MD PhD

Role: primary

Stephan Von Bardeleben, MD

Role: primary

Ioannis Iakovou, MD PhD

Role: primary

Diego Maffeo, MD PhD

Role: primary

Giusepe Tarantini, MD

Role: primary

Rutger-Jan Nuis

Role: primary

+31614858291

Rui Teles, MD

Role: primary

Thomas Pilgrim, MD

Role: primary

Daniel Blackman, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nuis RJ, van Belle E, Teles R, Blackman D, Veulemans V, Santos IA, Pilgrim T, Tarantini G, Saia F, Iakovou I, Mascherbauer J, Vincent F, Geleijnse M, Sathananthan J, Wood D, Makkar R, Van Mieghem NM; BASELINE Investigators. BAlloon expandable vs. SElf expanding transcatheter vaLve for degenerated bioprosthesIs: design and rationale of the BASELINE trial. Am Heart J. 2023 Feb;256:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36410441 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BASELINE TRIAL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SOURCE XT REGISTRY
NCT01238497 COMPLETED
SAPIEN 3 Ultra EU PMS
NCT04860752 COMPLETED