Balloon vs. Self Expanding Transcatheter Valve for Degenerated Bioprosthesis
NCT ID: NCT04843072
Last Updated: 2022-07-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To compare TAVI with EVOLUT R/Pro vs. SAPIEN-3 / Ultra in terms of device success.
Study design: International multi-center randomized study with 1:1 randomization to TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/Pro.
Study population: 440 patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis (aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation) and selected for transfemoral TAVI by heart-team consensus.
Investigational intervention: Transfemoral TAVI with SAPIEN-3 / Ultra or Evolut R/PRO
Main study parameters/endpoints:
1. Primary endpoint is device success at 30 days
Defined by
* Absence of procedural mortality AND
* Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND
* Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no severe prosthesis- patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation). Severe prosthesis patient mismatch is defined by effective orifice area (EOAi) ≤0.65 cm2/m2
2. Safety endpoint at 1 year defined by the composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, rehospitalization for heart failure or valve related problems.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve for Treatment of Symptomatic Native Aortic Valve Stenosis (BEST)
NCT05454150
Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis.
NCT03011346
THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial
NCT00530894
SMall Annuli Randomized To Evolut™ or SAPIEN™ Trial
NCT04722250
Early Feasibility Study (EFS) of Abbott's Balloon-expandable (BE) TAVI System for the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
NCT07116551
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Evolut R/Pro bioprosthesis
Study subjects will receive a self-expanding-valve (either the Evolut R or PRO device)
Evolut R/PRO bioprosthesis
To compare Evolut R/PRO versus Sapien S3/Ultra in failing surgical bioprostheses
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Study subjects will receive a balloon-expanding-valve (either the Edwards Sapien S3 or Ultra)
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evolut R/PRO bioprosthesis
To compare Evolut R/PRO versus Sapien S3/Ultra in failing surgical bioprostheses
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Edwards Sapien S3/Ultra bioprosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis requiring valve replacement and eligible for transfemoral TAVI with balloon expandable or self-expanding platform per heart team consensus based on multi-modality imaging assessment (including echocardiography and multidetector CT).
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Multi-valve defects requiring intervention
* Clinically unstable and/or inotropic/vasopressor /mechanical support.
* Known mural thrombus in the left ventricle
* Presence of a mechanical aortic valve
* History of recent (within 1 month) stroke or TIA
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolas van Mieghem
Prof. dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolas Van Mieghem, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rutger-Jan Nuis, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cedars Sinai
Los Angeles, California, United States
Vienna General Hospital
Vienna, , Austria
St Paul's and Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, , Canada
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Institut Cœur Poumon
Lille, , France
Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Medical Center Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
Düsseldorf, , Germany
University Hospital Mainz
Mainz, , Germany
Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
Athens, , Greece
Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Fondazione Poliambulanza Institute, Brescia, Italy
Brescia, , Italy
University Hospital of Padova
Padua, , Italy
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental
Lisbon, , Portugal
Inselspital, University Hospital
Bern, , Switzerland
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Raj Makkar, MD
Role: primary
Christian Hengstenberg, MD, PhD
Role: primary
John Webb, MD
Role: primary
Lars Sondergaard, MD
Role: primary
Eric Van Belle, MD
Role: primary
Verena Veulemans, MD PhD
Role: primary
Stephan Von Bardeleben, MD
Role: primary
Ioannis Iakovou, MD PhD
Role: primary
Diego Maffeo, MD PhD
Role: primary
Giusepe Tarantini, MD
Role: primary
Rui Teles, MD
Role: primary
Thomas Pilgrim, MD
Role: primary
Daniel Blackman, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nuis RJ, van Belle E, Teles R, Blackman D, Veulemans V, Santos IA, Pilgrim T, Tarantini G, Saia F, Iakovou I, Mascherbauer J, Vincent F, Geleijnse M, Sathananthan J, Wood D, Makkar R, Van Mieghem NM; BASELINE Investigators. BAlloon expandable vs. SElf expanding transcatheter vaLve for degenerated bioprosthesIs: design and rationale of the BASELINE trial. Am Heart J. 2023 Feb;256:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BASELINE TRIAL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.