Randomized Comparison of Catheter-based Strategies for Interventional Access Site Closure During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT ID: NCT04459208

Last Updated: 2021-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

516 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-26

Study Completion Date

2021-08-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 2 different vascular closure device (VCD) strategies during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The study hypothesizes that the choice of one over the other VCD in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI may demonstrate relevant differences in the rate of peri-procedural complications and effectiveness of vascular closure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Use of a plug-based VCD in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI as compared to a suture-based VCD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Manta

plug-based vascular closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manta

Intervention Type DEVICE

plug-based vascular closure

ProGlide

suture-based vascular closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ProGlide

Intervention Type DEVICE

suture-based vascular closure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manta

plug-based vascular closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

ProGlide

suture-based vascular closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with an indication for transfemoral TAVI as judged by the local heart team.
2. Transfemoral access route and a commercially-available transcatheter aortic valve is selected by the local heart team.
3. The patient is willing to provide written informed consent and comply with protocol- specified follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Vascular access site anatomy not suitable for percutaneous vascular closure.
2. Vascular access site complications prior to the TAVI procedure.
3. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any VCD component.
4. Unstable active bleeding/ bleeding diathesis or significant unmanageable anemia.
5. Absence of computed tomographic data of the access site before the procedure.
6. Systemic infection or a local infection at or near the access site.
7. Life expectancy of less than 6 months due to non-cardiac conditions.
8. Patient cannot adhere to or complete the investigational protocol for any reason.
9. Pregnant or nursing subjects.
10. Participation in any other interventional trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helios Health Institute GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, PD Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Herzzentrum Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abdel-Wahab M, Hartung P, Dumpies O, Obradovic D, Wilde J, Majunke N, Boekstegers P, Muller R, Seyfarth M, Vorpahl M, Kiefer P, Noack T, Leontyev S, Sandri M, Rotta Detto Loria J, Kitamura M, Borger MA, Funkat AK, Hohenstein S, Desch S, Holzhey D, Thiele H; CHOICE-CLOSURE Investigators. Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):170-183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057856. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34738828 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-0191

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.