Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
47 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study included fifty one patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective supratentorial mass resection surgery. The patients were randomized into three groups for investigation of the effects of mannitol alone and in combination with furosemide in different doses. Blood sodium, potassium, chlorine, lactate, urine and osmolarity levels were recorded. The brain relaxation score (BRS) was evaluated twice by the surgeon using a 4 point scale (1=very good, 2=good, 3=bad, 4=very bad); at dura opening, and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Hypertonic Saline and Mannitol on Brain Relaxation During Supratentorial Tumors Resection
NCT04314674
Furosemide vs Placebo for Brain Relaxation
NCT01054404
Hypertonic Saline 75% vs Mannitol 20%
NCT00199511
Fluid Therapy During Brain Tumor Resection in Children
NCT02707549
Mannitol Use During Partial Nephrectomy Prior to Renal Ischemia and Impact on Renal Function Outcomes
NCT01606787
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Drug doses were determined based on the ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight (ABW) if the real body weight was 30 percent higher than the calculated ideal weight.
After premedication with midazolam (0.03 mg.kg-1) (Dormicum®, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), the patients were moved to the operating room and placed under continuous monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure measurement and peripheral oxygen saturation. Intravenous (IV) bolus doses of propofol (2 mg.kg-1) (Propofol®, Fresenius Kabi, Homburg, Germany) rocuronium (0.6 mg.kg-1) (Curon®, Mustafa Nevzat, Istanbul, Turkey), remifentanil infusion (0.15 µg.kg-1) (Ultiva®, Glaxo Smith Kline, London, UK) and 0.7 FiO2 oxygen-air were used in the induction of anesthesia, while remifentanil (0.15 µg.kg-1) (Ultiva®, Glaxo Smith Kline, London, UK), rocuronium (0.03 mg.kg-1) (Curon®, Mustafa Nevzat, Istanbul, Turkey) infusions, and 0.5-1 MAC sevoflurane (Sevorane®, Abbvie, North Chicago, USA) in a mixture of 0.4 FiO2 oxygen-air were used in the maintenance. A nasogastric tube was inserted into each patient after intubation, and invasive blood pressure monitoring was continued with arterial cannulation, while urine output was monitored by inserting a foley urinary catheter. The body temperature was measured by urinary catheter. In the IV fluid management; balanced fluids were administered (Isolayte-S® , Eczacıbaşı Baxter, Istanbul, Turkey) for maintenance and replacement, colloids and blood products were also administered in the case of bleeding. At the time of wound closure tramadol 100 mg (Contramal®, Abdi İbrahim, Istanbul, Turkey) and ondansetron 8 mg IV (Zofer®, Glaxo Smith Kline, London, UK) were administered. At the end of the operation, decurarization was carried out through the administration of atropine (0.01 mg.kg-1) (Atropine sülfat®, Galen, Istanbul, Turkey) and neostigmine (0.02 mg.kg-1) (Neostigmine®, Adeka, Samsun, Turkey).
The patients were randomized into 3 groups using a closed envelope method, group 1; mannitol 0.5 g.kg-1 and furosemide 0.5 mg.kg-1 (G1), group 2; mannitol 1 g.kg-1 and furosemide 0.5 mg.kg-1 (G2) and group 3; mannitol 0.5 g.kg-1 and placebo (G3). All medications were prepared by a single nurse in 100 mL of a 0.9 percent isotonic saline solution. After head fixation, all patients were administered with mannitol (over 20 minutes) and the study drug. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis (Cobas b 221 blood gas analyzer, Roche®, Basel, Switzerland) was made at 30 minute intervals in the first 2 hour and then again in the 6th, 12th and 24th hours after study drug administration. Blood sodium, potassium, chlorine, lactate levels and urine output were recorded in each intervals. Blood osmolarity measured levels were recorded before the study drug administration and 2nd hours. The brain relaxation score (BRS) was evaluated twice by the surgical team using a 4 point scale (1= very good, 2= good, 3= bad, 4= very bad); first, at the time of dura opening, and second, 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug.
All patients were extubated at the end of the surgery and followed in the neurosurgical-intensive care unit (NICU) for 24 hours postoperatively.
The surgery type was recorded. The volume of peroperative blood loss, transfused blood products, the volume of the given peroperative IV fluids and fluid balance were also recorded.
Statistical analysis:
On the basis of previous study (10) and the assumption that a difference of 1 unit on BRS from 1 to 4 in brain relaxation is clinically relevant, setting α equal to 0.05 and β equal to 0.9, we calculated a sample size of 15 patients per group. To compensate for dropouts, the study included 51 patients.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 21.0. Differences between the groups were analysed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the post-hoc Tukey analysis. The differences in ASA, gender and BRS between groups were analyzed by using Pearson chi-square test. Differences within groups in electrolyte and lactate levels, osmolarity and BRS were analyzed by repeated measures of ANOVA with the post-hoc Bonferroni correction test. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mannitol,furosemide
Mannitol 0.5mg/kg and furosemide 0.5mg/kg IV is compared with mannitol 1mg/kg and furosemide 0.5mg/kg
mannitol
This drug is in our routine use of neuroanesthesia, are given in peroperatifyl brain relaxation
Furosemide
This drug is can be used alone or with mannitol for brain relaxation
Mannitol, placebo
Mannitol 0.5mg/kg and placebo is compared with mannitol+forosemide
mannitol
This drug is in our routine use of neuroanesthesia, are given in peroperatifyl brain relaxation
placebo
mannitol alone is compared with placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mannitol
This drug is in our routine use of neuroanesthesia, are given in peroperatifyl brain relaxation
Furosemide
This drug is can be used alone or with mannitol for brain relaxation
placebo
mannitol alone is compared with placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for supratentorial mass resection under elective conditions
Exclusion Criteria
* kidney insufficiency
* Diabetes insipidus,
* Electrolyte imbalance and
* Who are unconscious
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eren Fatma Akcil
MD
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vialet R, Leone M, Albanese J, Martin C. Calculated serum osmolality can lead to a systematic bias compared to direct measurement. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Apr;17(2):106-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000163200.48483.56.
Bebawy JF, Ramaiah VK, Zeeni C, Hemmer LB, Koht A, Gupta DK. The effect of furosemide on intravascular volume status and electrolytes in patients receiving mannitol: an intraoperative safety analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan;25(1):51-4. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318269c335.
Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS; Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, Manley GT, Nemecek A, Newell DW, Rosenthal G, Schouten J, Shutter L, Timmons SD, Ullman JS, Videtta W, Wilberger JE, Wright DW. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XV. Steroids. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24 Suppl 1:S91-5. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9981. No abstract available.
Li Q, Chen H, Hao JJ, Yin NN, Xu M, Zhou JX. Agreement of measured and calculated serum osmolality during the infusion of mannitol or hypertonic saline in patients after craniotomy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 7;15:138. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0119-4.
Manninen PH, Lam AM, Gelb AW, Brown SC. The effect of high-dose mannitol on serum and urine electrolytes and osmolality in neurosurgical patients. Can J Anaesth. 1987 Sep;34(5):442-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03014345.
Pollay M, Fullenwider C, Roberts PA, Stevens FA. Effect of mannitol and furosemide on blood-brain osmotic gradient and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1983 Dec;59(6):945-50. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.6.0945.
Procaccio F, Stocchetti N, Citerio G, Berardino M, Beretta L, Della Corte F, D'Avella D, Brambilla GL, Delfini R, Servadei F, Tomei G. Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe head trauma (part II). Criteria for medical treatment. J Neurosurg Sci. 2000 Mar;44(1):11-8.
Procaccio F, Stocchetti N, Citerio G, Berardino M, Beretta L, Della Corte F, D'Avella D, Brambilla GL, Delfini R, Servadei F, Tomei G. Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe head trauma (part I). Initial assessment; evaluation and pre-hospital treatment; current criteria for hospital admission; systemic and cerebral monitoring. J Neurosurg Sci. 2000 Mar;44(1):1-10.
Quentin C, Charbonneau S, Moumdjian R, Lallo A, Bouthilier A, Fournier-Gosselin MP, Bojanowski M, Ruel M, Sylvestre MP, Girard F. A comparison of two doses of mannitol on brain relaxation during supratentorial brain tumor craniotomy: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2013 Apr;116(4):862-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318282dc70. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
Rozet I, Tontisirin N, Muangman S, Vavilala MS, Souter MJ, Lee LA, Kincaid MS, Britz GW, Lam AM. Effect of equiosmolar solutions of mannitol versus hypertonic saline on intraoperative brain relaxation and electrolyte balance. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):697-704. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000286980.92759.94.
Schettini A, Stahurski B, Young HF. Osmotic and osmotic-loop diuresis in brain surgery. Effects on plasma and CSF electrolytes and ion excretion. J Neurosurg. 1982 May;56(5):679-84. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.5.0679.
Thenuwara K, Todd MM, Brian JE Jr. Effect of mannitol and furosemide on plasma osmolality and brain water. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):416-21. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00029.
Todd MM, Cutkomp J, Brian JE. Influence of mannitol and furosemide, alone and in combination, on brain water content after fluid percussion injury. Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1176-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00017.
Akcil EF, Dilmen OK, Karabulut ES, Koksal SS, Altindas F, Tunali Y. Effective and safe mannitol administration in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery: A prospective, randomized and double blind study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;159:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 15.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
test link
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cerrahpasa Neuroanesthesia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.