Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2018-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Complex Kidney Lesion Diagnosis in Patients With CKD Extension
NCT03196076
Establishing a New Ultrasound Technique to Improve Assessment of Chronic Kidney Disease.
NCT06159439
Assessment of Changes in Renal Cortical and Medullary Blood Flow by Contrast Ultrasound
NCT00631553
Can Ultrasound Replace Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Those Unable to Have Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Agents
NCT01151566
The Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Acute Kidney Injury in ICU
NCT06353659
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the sensitivity of CEUS in diagnosing kidney malignancy in patients with a risk factor for kidney malignancy and compare it to the current gold standard test in this patient population. Secondary analysis will include more optimal contrast-enhanced imaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a subset of patients who can receive these studies. The study outcome will lead to immediate clinical application in patients with chronic kidney disease. Given the cost-effectiveness and adverse event profile, it has excellent potential to become established as first line diagnostics in the general patient population as well.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Perflutren lipid microsphere
Activate by shaking for 45 seconds using VIALMIX. Use activated product within 5 minutes. Infusion: The recommended infusion dose for activated perflutren is via an IV infusion of 1.3 mL added to 50 mL of preservative-free saline. The rate of infusion should be initiated at 4.0 mL/minute, but titrated as necessary to achieve optimal image enhancement, not to exceed 10 mL/minute per P.I. approval
Perflutren lipid microsphere
Dosing per approved package label
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perflutren lipid microsphere
Dosing per approved package label
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Able to provide written informed consent
2. Willing to comply with protocol requirements
3. At least 18 years of age
4. Have kidney disease, defined as either CKD II-VI, determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of \<90 and derived from serum creatinine measurements, or albuminuria/proteinuria, determined by albumin to creatinine ratio or protein to creatinine ratio of \>30mg/gm, or having received a kidney transplant
5. Have at least one kidney lesion identified but incompletely characterized on a non-contrasted US, CT, or MR exam for which the patient's provider recommends follow-up studies or further evaluation with an additional imaging tests.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Critically ill or medically unstable and whose critical course during the observation period would be unpredictable (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen)
2. Known hypersensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride or to any component of perflutren lipid (Definity®)
3. Right to left shunt, severe pulmonary hypertension (Pulmonary artery pressure \>90mmHg), or adult respiratory distress syndrome
4. Active cardiac disease including any of the following:
* Severe congestive heart failure (class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association)
* Unstable angina.
* Severe arrhythmia (i.e. ventricular tachycardia, flutter fibrillation; ventricular premature complexes occurring close to the preceding T- wave, multifocal complexes).
* Myocardial infarction within 14 days prior to the date of proposed Definity® administration.
* Uncontrolled systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) \>180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP \>100 mm Hg despite optimal medical management
5. Is in an intensive care setting
6. Has an unstable neurological disease (e.g cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) within the 3 months before signing of informed consent
7. Has undergone an invasive procedure on kidney lesion (e.g. tissue biopsy, surgery, nonsurgical cytoreductive procedure) since identification of lesion via US without contrast
8. Has any other medical condition or other circumstances that would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data or of achieving the study objectives such as:
* Mental illness
* Drug abuse
9. Female patient who is pregnant or lactating (the possibility of pregnancy has to be excluded by negative serum or urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin results, obtained within 24 hours before the perflutren lipid administration, or on the basis of patient history, e.g.: tubal ligation, hysterectomy or a minimum of 1 year without menses)
10. Obesity that limits obtainment of acceptable images
\-
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
OTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emily Chang, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina Kidney Center 7024 Burnett Womack CB #7155 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7155
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina of Chapel hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Stewart JH, Buccianti G, Lowenfels AB, Wolfe RA, Jones E, Disney AP, Briggs D, McCredie M, Boyle P. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06154-1.
Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Jun;3(6):527-32. doi: 10.1038/nrd1417. No abstract available.
Lind Ramskov K, Thomsen HS. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and contrast medium-induced nephropathy: a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea for patients with reduced renal function? Acta Radiol. 2009 Nov;50(9):965-7. doi: 10.3109/02841850903209218. No abstract available.
Nicolau C, Bunesch L, Pano B, Salvador R, Ribal MJ, Mallofre C, Sebastia C. Prospective evaluation of CT indeterminate renal masses using US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Mar;40(3):542-51. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0237-3.
Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, Settineri N, Magno C, Melloni D, Caruso R, Scribano E. Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced US. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):158-65. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431051924.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-1866
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.