The Effects of Multi-focal tDCS on Motor-cognitive Dysfunctions in Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT02656316
Last Updated: 2019-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Freezing of Gait
NCT02266004
Open Label Treatment With tDCS for Parkinson's and Related Disorders for Improvement of Speech, Gait and Mood
NCT02104401
Can tDCS Enhance Efficacy of Rehabilitative Intervention for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease?
NCT02205216
Exploit the Neural Source and the Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease and Multiple System Atrophy
NCT03721887
Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Gait Function Improvement of Parkinson's Disease Patient
NCT04591236
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on strong rationale and preliminary findings in previous works, the objectives of the current proposal are to conduct a prospective multi-center, double-blinded, stratified controlled randomized clinical trial, comparing real multifocal tDCS to sham stimulation. The main aim:
\- To demonstrate the "short-term" and the longer-term effects of tDCS on FOG severity and frequency.
Participants: A total of 85 patients will be recruited (Hoehn and Yahr Stage 1-3.5) who suffer from FOG, as measured by the new FOG questionnaire (NFOG-Q) and as demonstrated in response to a FOG provoking protocol, who are on stable medications, who have no contraindications to tDCS, and who are between the ages of 40-80. Patients with DBS will not be included.
tDCS intervention: Subjects will be randomized to receive either a real or sham tDCS intervention. Each intervention will consist of 10, 20-minute treatments completed over 2 consecutive weeks (i.e., 5 per week), following previously established protocols. A single, weekly "maintenance" treatment will then be provided for the following 12 weeks (note: for depression, maintenance tDCS is most often provided once every two weeks; we will take a more conservative approach here in this first long-term study for FOG in PD).
Participants will continue taking their regular medications, and treatments will take place in the "ON" medication state (approximately at the same time of day for each treatment). The real tDCS intervention will simultaneously target both the M1 leg area and the the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), in the brain hemisphere contralateral to the more affected side of the body, as determined by the summation of the motor symptoms on The unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS). Current will be applied using an array of 8 sponge electrodes and the StarStim tDCS device and software (Neuroelectrics, Inc). For this protocol, the placement and current delivered through each electrode has been optimized using the Neuroelectrics StimWeaver® Stimulation Optimization Service . In case of bilateral symptom symmetry, tDCS will target the left M1 and DLPFC. For the sham intervention, the same electrode placement and stimulation parameters will be used; however, current will only be applied for the first 60 seconds of the stimulation session. This is a reliable control as sensations arising from tDCS diminish considerably after the first minute of stimulation. At the end of each treatment session, participants will complete a short questionnaire to assess potential side-effects. At the end of the entire intervention, participants will be asked to state if, in their opinion, they received the real or sham intervention.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome will be the number of FOG episodes measured in the lab when subjects undergo a validated FOG-invoking protocol, after the initial 2-week intervention and at the final study point, similar to that proposed by Ziegler et al. Briefly, this protocol includes situations that have been shown to provoke FOG. Patients will be asked to sit, to stand up and to walk to a a mark on the floor. They will perform two 360° turns, clockwise and counter-clockwise. Then, the patients will be asked to open a door and walk through it, turn outside, and come back to their chair. Secondary outcomes of FOG will include FOG duration and the new FOG questionnaire (NFOG-Q). This FOG-provoking protocol will take place in both the ON and OFF medication state and higher values (worse) of FOG will be used as the primary outcome measure (in secondary analyses, we will examine ON and OFF FOG separately).
Additional secondary measures will test the influence of tDCS on other motor, cognitive or motor-cognitive functions related to PD and FOG. Secondary outcomes related to motor function, which are likely to be affected by changes in M1 excitability, will include gait speed (usual walking), Timed Up \& Go scores, UPDRS motor scores, and level of activity over 7 days using portable, lightweight, water-proof sensors. Secondary measures of executive function, which are hypothesized to be responsive to tDCS of the DLPFC, will include the Trail Making test (TMT) parts A and B, and a previously validated computerized neuropsychological battery that provides normalized scores for executive function and attention (and memory). Dual-tasking gait speed (i.e., walking while performing a serial subtraction test) will assess motor-cognitive interactions. Functional near infra-red spectroscopy (available in Boston and Tel Aviv) will assess frontal activation during dual-tasking walking; this reflects the subjects ability to handle cognitive loading and has been associated with FOG. Finally, the PDQ-39 will evaluate quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active tDCS
The active tDCS condition will consist of 20 min of continuous stimulation. This amount of stimulation is safe for healthy young and older adults and has been shown to induce acute beneficial changes in cortical excitability and cognitive functions.
Active tDCS
In this group subjects will receive 20 min of treatment.
Sham tDCS
The Sham tDCS - an inactive stimulation.
Sham tDCS
In this group subjects will receive 20 min of sham stimulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active tDCS
In this group subjects will receive 20 min of treatment.
Sham tDCS
In this group subjects will receive 20 min of sham stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with PD, with Hoehn and Yahr Stage between 1-3.5, who suffer from FOG, as measured at screening by the previously validated new FOG questionnaire (NFOG-Q), whose medications have not changed within 1 month of the study and are not anticipated to change during the study, are able to walk independently, and who are between the ages of 40-80 inclusive.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who show no FOG during testing in the lab in response to a FOG provoking protocol, any diagnosed psychiatric or other neurological disorder, stroke, unbalanced and high blood pressure, pregnancy, participation in any clinical trial in the last three months, unwillingness to be randomized; implanted with deep brain stimulation, pacemakers, intracranial electrodes, implanted defibrillators or any other prosthesis; or a perceived inability to complete the study. Additional exclusion criteria related to tDCS safety will include a personal or family history of epilepsy, the use of neuro-active drugs, or risk of metal fragments in the eyes or head.
25 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
michal roll
Director of Research and Developmen
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nir Giladi, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Head of Neurological institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute for Aging Research
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Weiss A, Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. New evidence for gait abnormalities among Parkinson's disease patients who suffer from freezing of gait: insights using a body-fixed sensor worn for 3 days. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015 Mar;122(3):403-10. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1279-y. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
Leite J, Goncalves OF, Carvalho S. Facilitative effects of bi-hemispheric tDCS in cognitive deficits of Parkinson disease patients. Med Hypotheses. 2014 Feb;82(2):138-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.021. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
Zhou J, Hao Y, Wang Y, Jor'dan A, Pascual-Leone A, Zhang J, Fang J, Manor B. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces the cost of performing a cognitive task on gait and postural control. Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Apr;39(8):1343-8. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12492. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
Manor B, Dagan M, Herman T, Gouskova NA, Vanderhorst VG, Giladi N, Travison TG, Pascual-Leone A, Lipsitz LA, Hausdorff JM. Multitarget Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Freezing of Gait: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mov Disord. 2021 Nov;36(11):2693-2698. doi: 10.1002/mds.28759. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TASMC-15-NIR-710-CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.