Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid in Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02655653

Last Updated: 2020-06-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TA) in reducing bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgery, with the hypothesis that TA is more effective. The investigators also seek to further examine the clinical benefits and adverse effects profiles of epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single center double blinded randomized controlled study comparing the effectiveness of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TA) in reducing 24hour blood transfusion and chest tube drainage. From October 2008 to September 2011, patients greater than 18 years of age, scheduled for cardiac surgery requiring CPB were consented. Eligible operations included; coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), a heart valve repair/replacement, or a concomitant CABG and valve surgery were enrolled.

Consented patients were randomized into one of the two groups using a 1:1 randomization sequence generated by a computer program. Randomization sequence and the study drugs were kept in a locked box and were opened only by unblinded study personnel who were not involved in the clinical care of the patient. This person prepared the study drug following the instructions of the study protocol, resulting in preparations of EACA and TA that contained equi-potent similar volumes of the drug in the syringe, in order to ensure blinding. Antifibrinolytic study drug was administered following anesthetic induction. EACA was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in the investigators hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.

The primary endpoint was the amount of chest tube drainage and the amount of blood products used in the first 24 hours following surgery (surrogate measurement for blood loss) was measured at 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of packed red blood cells (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and platelets administered during the first 24 hours after surgery was collected. Additionally, patients were monitored for any complications during their stay in the hospital and up to 30 days post-operatively. Complications included renal dysfunction (defined as the need for at least 1 hemodialysis or doubling of pre-surgical creatinine levels), stroke and seizures (clinically diagnosed), myocardial infarction (new Q waves in two electrocardiogram leads), cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, re-operation and death. Monitoring of the patients prior to discharge involved chart review during their stay in the hospital; if a post-operative complication was suspected, the complication was confirmed using Montefiore Medical Center's Carecast Database, which contained independent results such as MRI's, CT scans, or labs. Additionally, computer records of the patients were searched to determine if there were documented complications in the 30-day post-operative time period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA)

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered following anesthetic induction: EACA was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered

Intervention Type DRUG

Following anesthetic induction, Epsilon-aminocaproic acid was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.

Tranexamic acid (TA)

Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tranexamic Acid administered

Intervention Type DRUG

Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered

Following anesthetic induction, Epsilon-aminocaproic acid was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tranexamic Acid administered

Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities
* Subjects scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion Criteria

* Vulnerable patient populations (unable to consent)
* Religious or other prohibitive reason for not receiving blood transfusion
* History of allergy to epsilon-aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid
* Pregnant or breast-feeding (if applicable)
* The participation in another clinical or device trial that would affect the patient's coagulation profile
* Cardiac or cardiopulmonary transplantation procedure
* Any history of stroke and/or non-coronary thrombotic disorders (DVT, PE)
* Clinical signs consistent with non-coronary thrombotic disease
* Known congenital deficiency of Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin and homozygous Factor V Leiden
* Known congenital bleeding disorders
* Weight \< 50 kg
* Weight \> 150 kg
* Acute renal failure or creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL
* Current surgery including any implantable ventricular assist device requiring CPB including ECMO (extracorpeal membrane oxygenation)
* Current surgery including the aortic arch and/or descending thoracic aorta
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jonathan Leff

Chief, Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan D Leff, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08-08-291

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid
NCT04089865 COMPLETED PHASE4
Tranexamic Acid in Major Vascular Surgery
NCT02335359 COMPLETED PHASE4