Comparison of Tranexamic to Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid: a Prospective Analysis of Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01248104

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We designed a prospective double-blinded randomized trial in an attempt to detect a difference between tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) in reducing transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: This study compares the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) to epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) in reducing blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: This was a double-blinded randomized trial. Patients (n=100) undergoing cardi- ac surgery were randomized to receive either TXA (10 mg/kg bolus followed by an infu- sion of 1mg/kg/hr) or EACA (150mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr). The primary outcome measure was a difference in transfusion amounts.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tranexamic Acid

The research pharmacist used computer randomization to assign patients to receive either TXA or EACA. The TXA group re- ceived a bolus of 10 mg / kg over 15 minutes fol- lowed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tranexamic Acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Infusion during cardiac surgery

Aminocaproic Acid

The research pharmacist used computer randomization to assign patients to receive either TXA or EACA. The EACA group received a bolus of 100 mg / kg given over 15 minutes shortly after induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion of 10 mg/kg/hr.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Aminocaproic Acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Infusion during cardiac surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tranexamic Acid

Infusion during cardiac surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Aminocaproic Acid

Infusion during cardiac surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TXA Amicar

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Is the subject 18 years of age or older?
2. Is the subject scheduled for primary cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB)?
3. Is the subject more than 30 kg ( 66 lbs)?
4. Does subject understand English?

Exclusion Criteria

1. Does the subject have existing coagulation defects (INR \> 1.5, platelets \< 100 ?
2. Does the subject have renal failure (defined as BUN/Cr ratio 20:1 ?
3. Does the subject have severe liver disease (AST \& ALT\> 3x normal) ?
4. Is the subject having emergency cardiac surgery, complex aortic surgery, combination valve/CABG surgeries, or redo cardiac surgery?
5. Is the subject having any procedure where CPB is not anticipated?
6. Is the patient weight greater than 150 kg?
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jason Gatling, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jason Gatling, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5100064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tranexamic Acid Infusion During Elective Spine Surgery
NCT04312880 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4