Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid in Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery (NCT NCT02655653)
NCT ID: NCT02655653
Last Updated: 2020-06-16
Results Overview
Chest tube drainage are collected from the nursing records, every 4th hourly the amount fluid collected is reported in the collection sheets.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
114 participants
4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
2020-06-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered following anesthetic induction: EACA was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr.
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Epsilon-aminocaproic acid was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid and Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid in Reducing Bleeding and Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered following anesthetic induction: EACA was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr.
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Epsilon-aminocaproic acid was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Total
n=114 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64 years
n=5 Participants
|
65 years
n=7 Participants
|
64 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hoursChest tube drainage are collected from the nursing records, every 4th hourly the amount fluid collected is reported in the collection sheets.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Chest Tube Drainage
4 hr
|
225 mL
Standard Deviation 400
|
200 mL
Standard Deviation 375
|
|
Chest Tube Drainage
8 hr
|
400 mL
Standard Deviation 675
|
375 mL
Standard Deviation 550
|
|
Chest Tube Drainage
12 hr
|
500 mL
Standard Deviation 825
|
425 mL
Standard Deviation 750
|
|
Chest Tube Drainage
24 hr
|
800 mL
Standard Deviation 1225
|
700 mL
Standard Deviation 1100
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgeryFour types of blood products may be given through blood transfusions: whole blood, red blood cells, platelets, and plasma
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Amount of Blood Products Used
|
1.20 L
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
.59 L
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of renal dysfunction and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnosis of Renal Dysfunction Post-operation
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of myocardial infraction and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Post-operation
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of respiratory arrest and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Have Confirmed Diagnosis of Respiratory Arrest
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of stroke and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Confirmed Diagnosis of Stroke
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of seizure and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Confirmed Diagnosis of Seizure
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryConfirmed diagnosis of reopeartion and hospitalization for the same within 30 days after the surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reoperation
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 days after surgeryOutcome measures
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 Participants
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 Participants
How many subjects had a myocardial infarction?
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality Within 30 Days Post-operation
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: BaselineMeasurements taken as a composite. BMI, Sex, Age are to be determined to ensure that the subjects' characteristics were comparable between the Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid groups.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: IntraoperativeOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: IntraoperativeMeasurements are taken as a composite to determine that the subjects' characteristics are comparable between the Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid groups. Measurements include temperature, Heparin dose, protamine given, time of surgery, time of cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic clamp time.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Epsilon-aminocaproic Acid (EACA)
n=56 participants at risk
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered following anesthetic induction: EACA was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr.
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Epsilon-aminocaproic acid was administered as a bolus loading dose of 150 mg/ kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 15 mg/ kg /hr. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=58 participants at risk
Tranexamic Acid administered following induction: TA was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion.
Tranexamic Acid administered: Following anesthetic induction, Tranexamic Acid was administered as a bolus dose of 30 mg /kg followed by a 16 mg/ kg/hour maintenance infusion. Maintenance infusion of both drugs was discontinued when the patient arrived in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. In addition to routine blood sampling ( standard of care in our hospital), patients had thromboelastogram(TEG) and D-dimer levels drawn at the following time points: post incision but prior to initial antifibrinolytic load, immediately following the antifibrinolytic loading dose, and post-protamine reversal of heparin.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Death
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
|
3.6%
2/56
|
3.4%
2/58
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Dysfunction
|
5.4%
3/56
|
3.4%
2/58
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Reoperation within 24 hours
|
5.4%
3/56
|
6.9%
4/58
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/58
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Arrest
|
19.6%
11/56
|
8.6%
5/58
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place