The Effects of Acute Caloric Deprivation on Odour Identification and Food Reward

NCT ID: NCT02653378

Last Updated: 2016-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine how the modality of energy depletion can differently impact appetite hormones, ad libitum food intake, food hedonics, and olfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objectives of the current randomized controlled study were to examine how the modality of an acute 3 day isocaloric -25% energy depletion by dieting alone or by aerobic exercise alone differently impacts appetite and appetite-related hormones, ad libitum energy intake (EI), food hedonics and food reward, and olfaction. It was hypothesized that independent of modality of depletion, that relative to the control, there would be increased ad libitum feeding and food reward, improvements in smell performance, and a decline in fasting leptin and increase in fasting total ghrelin. It was also hypothesized that the increased food reward would prove to be a predictor of ad libitum EI and that relative to the depletion by aerobic exercise alone, the depletion by diet alone would produce greater compensatory increases in appetite, ad libitum EI, and food reward.

Statistics

To test for differences in body weight, plasma hormone concentrations, relative-reinforcing value of food (RRVF), and olfaction across each condition of the study, repeated measures ANOVA controlling for day 1 as a covariate was employed. Pairwise comparisons at day 4 using Sidak adjustment to account for multiple comparisons are reported when the ANOVA was significant. One way repeated measures ANOVAs with Sidak adjustments for multiple comparisons were used to test for differences in variables measured only at day 4: body composition (fat mas, %Fat, and fat free mass), appetite, palatability, and ad libitum EI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Olfaction Diet Exercise Energy Depletion Food Hedonics Food Reward

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DIET ARM

A 25% energy depletion (daily for 3 days) induced by reducing the amount of energy intake that would otherwise keep the individual in energy balance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DIET

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

25% Energy Depletion by Diet only for 3 Days

EX ARM

A 25% energy depletion (daily for 3 days) induced by performing aerobic exercise at 50% of V02max.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EX

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

25% Energy Depletion by Exercise only for 3 Days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIET

25% Energy Depletion by Diet only for 3 Days

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

EX

25% Energy Depletion by Exercise only for 3 Days

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Free from any illness that could influence outcome of the experiment
* Weight-stable for \>6months
* aged between 18-40 years

Exclusion Criteria

* diabetic
* smoker
* medication
Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eric Doucet

Professor of Human Kinetics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Doucet, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Ottawa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McNeil J, Lamothe G, Cameron JD, Riou ME, Cadieux S, Lafreniere J, Goldfield G, Willbond S, Prud'homme D, Doucet E. Investigating predictors of eating: is resting metabolic rate really the strongest proxy of energy intake? Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov;106(5):1206-1212. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153718. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28877891 (View on PubMed)

Cameron JD, Goldfield GS, Riou ME, Finlayson GS, Blundell JE, Doucet E. Energy depletion by diet or aerobic exercise alone: impact of energy deficit modality on appetite parameters. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):1008-16. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.115584. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26888712 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H09-09-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Energy Balance Weight Regulation Study
NCT00619008 COMPLETED PHASE2