Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stenosis of Arteria-Venous Fistula in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Early Intervention Trial
NCT02266238
RCT of Paclitaxel DEB Compared to Standard PTA in Dialysis Fistula
NCT02558153
Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty for Dialysis Access Treatment
NCT01174472
Access Flow Based Intervention for Management of Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Access Dysfunction.
NCT02628119
Criteria for Accessory Vein Obliteration Trial.
NCT02632942
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to devise a strategy to prevent EFF, one needs to understand the physiology of fistula maturation. Creation of an AVF leads to an immediate increase in flow through the vein due to the pressure gradient created. This increase in flow leads to increase wall shear stress which is defined mathematically by the formula 4ηQ/πr3, where η is blood viscosity, Q is blood flow and r is vessel radius. Shear stress thus is directly proportional to blood flow while inversely proportional to vessel diameter. After the creation of the AVF, the flow mediated increase in shear stress is mitigated by vessel dilatation through biological mediators. Consequently the shear stress is brought back to pre-anastomosis levels leading to vessel dilation. It seems that this positive remodeling of the vein leading to AVF maturation is dependent on increase in blood flow rather than the increase in pressure. Any pathology affecting the blood flow through the newly constructed AVF can thus lead to failure to mature.
The two most important causes for EFF amenable to intervention are stenosis anywhere in the circuit (present in around 80% of EFF) and/or presence of accessory veins. While stenosis development is pathological and accessory vein presence is natural, both lead to decreased blood flow through the main AVF circuit, which may be responsible for failure to mature. Addressing these two entities in a timely fashion can lead to salvage of many AVF, which otherwise would have been abandoned.
Development of neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) is the main pathology causing stenosis in the AVF circuit. There are many factors thought to be responsible for the development of this NIH. These include turbulent flow with wall shear stress disturbances, uremic endothelial dysfunction, repeated venipunctures, and unique anatomic factors. The pathogenesis includes migration of smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts from media to intima, neoangiogenesis of microvessels inside neointima, and high levels of inflammatory blood markers.
Since its introduction, endovascular approach has shown a high rate of technical success in the treatment of stenotic lesions related to HD arteriovenous access. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PBA) is considered the treatment of choice for these lesions. Despite good technical and immediate success PBA has poor long term outcomes with recurrence rates of 60-70% at 6 months. One of the reasons could be the damage caused by angioplasty itself leading to intima-media rupture promoting the cascade of events leading to further development of NIH. Recently the use of covered stents at the time of angioplasty has shown better patency rates at 6 months but still not optimal. Lately the idea of delivering loco-regional pharmacological agents at the time of angioplasty to prevent NIH from happening has been extensively studied mostly in coronary arteries. This lead to the development of drug eluting stents and drug eluting balloons (DEB). These therapies have shown considerable advantage in clinical trials related to coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Although promising but advantages in coronary and peripheral arteries may not be applicable to arteriovenous access where the lesions are mostly venous with different characteristics. The role of these more costly interventions needs to be addressed in stenosis related to AVF, before wide spread use can be recommended. In a recent randomized non-blinded study involving 40 patients, Kostanos et al showed better 6 month patency rates (70% vs 25%) with DEB angioplasty as compared to standard PBA. The study is non-blinded and involved both AVG and AVF with target lesion spread all over the arteriovenous access circuit. Patane et al recently performed a study on 26 failing radiocephalic AVF's with juxta-anastamosis stenosis, defined as stenosis within 3 cm of arteriovenous anastamosis. In this study DEB angioplasty showed a 6 month primary patency of 96.1% which is much higher than historical conventional balloon angioplasty. The investigators targeted a lesion which resembles more closely arterial lesions where DEB has been shown to be effective, which seems more reasonable but there were no controls in the study. Due to the lack of a control group such high patency rates become questionable. Nevertheless this study highlights the importance of doing a randomized control trial targeting a specific lesion. In a controlled pilot study of radio-cephalic AVF with inflow stenosis Lai et al from Taiwan showed short term patency benefits with DEB angioplasty as compared to standard PBA. This being a pilot study had only 20 patients and was not adequately powered to answer the question. If these results are indeed proven to be true, this can lead to great improvement in patency of AVF's. In a randomized control trial the researchers are planning to assess the efficacy of DEB angioplasty as compared to standard PBA in AVF's with EFF.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug Eluting Balloon
After pre dilation of the lesion with regular angioplasty balloon, drug coated balloon Lutonix(R) by Bard Inc. will be introduced over the lesion as quickly as possible. Lutonix is a paclitaxel coated balloon which delivers the drug locally. The diameter of the drug coated balloon will be same as the diameter of the largest balloon used for pre dilation. Drug coated balloon will be inflated not exceeding the rated burst pressure. The minimum inflation time will be 1 minute.
Drug Eluting Balloon
After pre dilation of the lesion with regular angioplasty balloon, drug coated balloon Lutonix(R) by Bard Inc. will be introduced over the lesion as quickly as possible. Lutonix is a paclitaxel coated balloon which delivers the drug locally. The diameter of the drug coated balloon will be same as the diameter of the largest balloon used for pre dilation. Drug coated balloon will be inflated not exceeding the rated burst pressure. The minimum inflation time will be 1 minute.
Regular Angioplasty
After predilation of the lesion with regular balloon, the same balloon will be reintroduced without the drug to be inflated for a minimum of 1 minute. This angioplasty will not deliver any local drug.
Regular angioplasty
After predilation of the lesion with regular balloon, the same balloon will be reintroduced without the drug to be inflated for a minimum of 1 minute. This angioplasty will not deliver any local drug.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Drug Eluting Balloon
After pre dilation of the lesion with regular angioplasty balloon, drug coated balloon Lutonix(R) by Bard Inc. will be introduced over the lesion as quickly as possible. Lutonix is a paclitaxel coated balloon which delivers the drug locally. The diameter of the drug coated balloon will be same as the diameter of the largest balloon used for pre dilation. Drug coated balloon will be inflated not exceeding the rated burst pressure. The minimum inflation time will be 1 minute.
Regular angioplasty
After predilation of the lesion with regular balloon, the same balloon will be reintroduced without the drug to be inflated for a minimum of 1 minute. This angioplasty will not deliver any local drug.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with EFF
* Stenosis anywhere in the AVF being the only identifiable cause of EFF.
Exclusion Criteria
* AVF which is tortuous and lacks adequate straight segment for cannulation with 2 needles.
* Patients with allergy to paclitaxel
* Patients on anti-coagulation and those with bleeding disorders.
* Severe thrombocytopenia i.e platelet count\< 50,000.
* Life expectancy less than 12 months.
* Documented severe contrast allergy.
* Inability to come for timely and adequate follow up.
* Patients undergoing transplantation work up and expected to be transplanted within 6 months.
* EFF secondary to accessory veins or causes other than stenosis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Naveed Ul Haq
Director of Dialysis Access & Interventional Nephrology Program
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Naveed U Haq, MD, FASN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J, Litchfield T; Physician Operators Forum of RMS Lifeline. Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Kidney Int. 2003 Oct;64(4):1487-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00210.x.
Roy-Chaudhury P, Spergel LM, Besarab A, Asif A, Ravani P. Biology of arteriovenous fistula failure. J Nephrol. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):150-63.
Beathard GA, Settle SM, Shields MW. Salvage of the nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 May;33(5):910-6. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70425-7.
Turmel-Rodrigues L, Mouton A, Birmele B, Billaux L, Ammar N, Grezard O, Hauss S, Pengloan J. Salvage of immature forearm fistulas for haemodialysis by interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Dec;16(12):2365-71. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.12.2365.
Roy-Chaudhury P, Arend L, Zhang J, Krishnamoorthy M, Wang Y, Banerjee R, Samaha A, Munda R. Neointimal hyperplasia in early arteriovenous fistula failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Nov;50(5):782-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.019.
Asif A, Lenz O, Merrill D, Cherla G, Cipleu CD, Ellis R, Francois B, Epstein DL, Pennell P. Percutaneous management of perianastomotic stenosis in arteriovenous fistulae: results of a prospective study. Kidney Int. 2006 May;69(10):1904-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000358.
Haskal ZJ, Trerotola S, Dolmatch B, Schuman E, Altman S, Mietling S, Berman S, McLennan G, Trimmer C, Ross J, Vesely T. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):494-503. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902045.
Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schomig A, Pfisterer ME, Stone GW, Leon MB, de Lezo JS, Goy JJ, Park SJ, Sabate M, Suttorp MJ, Kelbaek H, Spaulding C, Menichelli M, Vermeersch P, Dirksen MT, Cervinka P, Petronio AS, Nordmann AJ, Diem P, Meier B, Zwahlen M, Reichenbach S, Trelle S, Windecker S, Juni P. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):937-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61444-5.
Cassese S, Byrne RA, Ott I, Ndrepepa G, Nerad M, Kastrati A, Fusaro M. Paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon angioplasty reduces target lesion revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):582-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.969972. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S, Christeas N, Siablis D. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. plain balloon dilation for the treatment of failing dialysis access: 6-month interim results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Apr;19(2):263-72. doi: 10.1583/11-3690.1.
Patane D, Giuffrida S, Morale W, L'Anfusa G, Puliatti D, Bisceglie P, Seminara G, Calcara G, Di Landro D, Malfa P. Drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of failing hemodialytic radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: our experience in the treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses. J Vasc Access. 2014 Sep-Oct;15(5):338-43. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000211. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
Lai CC, Fang HC, Tseng CJ, Liu CP, Mar GY. Percutaneous angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon improves target lesion restenosis on inflow lesions of autogenous radiocephalic fistulas: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2151 054
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.