Comparison of Standard Versus High Dose Urokinase for Dysfunctional Tunneled Dialysis Catheters in Haemodialysis Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT06802679

Last Updated: 2025-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) remain a frequent form of vascular access for patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis (HD). In our local setting, thrombolytic therapy with urokinase is used as first line therapy to restore catheter patency in patients who develop TDC dysfunction before considering a TDC exchange which is more invasive, requires hospital admission, and involves a higher cost. There are no published local data on the efficacy of Urokinase, though this is widely used in local practice as first line in the management of TDC dysfunction. Previous studies have also varied in terms of study methodology, dose and administration of urokinase in the form of systemic infusion or catheter lock therapy, with varying success rates of 78-97% (2,4-8). Overall, majority of these studies utilized higher doses of urokinase - some studies reported higher patency rates with high dose systemic infusion (4,5) or higher success rates when a higher dose was compared to a lower dose of urokinase lock (6-8). Bleeding events were very rare even in studies that use much higher doses or systemic infusion of urokinase (2,4-8). Our own preliminary data show lower lower success rates of around 52.5% compared to published reports, the question remains on how we can improve our patency rate and cost-effectiveness in treating TDC dysfunction without an increase in risk of adverse events. Therefore, we aim to answer the question as to whether an increase in dose of urokinase will achieve the above outcomes and result in a reduced need for TDC exchange.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodialysis Thrombolytic Therapy Dialysis Access Dysfunction Randomised Controlled Trial End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HIgh dose urokinase

Patients will be assessed for eligibility for study by nephrologist on duty who is also a PI or Co-I.

Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be enrolled in study and informed consent taken.

A trained HD nurse will test the catheter of the patient presenting with TDC dysfunction.

Once TDC dysfunction is confirmed, patients will be randomized to one of 2 groups and urokinase instillation done according to protocol (see section F9) After a minimum dwell time of 2 hours, urokinase is aspirated and catheter tested by a trained HD nurse. Haemodialysis is then carried out via the catheter.

Baseline clinical data, urokinase and hemodialysis details will be recorded for each patient visit as per data collection template.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Urokinase

Intervention Type DRUG

In the higher dose group: 30,000unit (1.5ml) per catheter lumen is instilled per catheter lumen (in both arterial and venous ports respectively). This allows utilization of the entire vial of Urokinase to prevent wastage and to assess if this increase in dose improves catheter patency and survival, thus reducing the need for a TDC exchange in our HD patients. The urokinase lock is dwelled for at least 2 hours, after which aspiration and catheter testing will be done by a trained HD nurse.

Standard dose urokinase

same as above but with different dosage of urokinase

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Urokinase

Intervention Type DRUG

20,000unit (1ml) is instilled per catheter lumen (in both arterial and venous ports respectively); and the remaining 1ml is discarded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Urokinase

In the higher dose group: 30,000unit (1.5ml) per catheter lumen is instilled per catheter lumen (in both arterial and venous ports respectively). This allows utilization of the entire vial of Urokinase to prevent wastage and to assess if this increase in dose improves catheter patency and survival, thus reducing the need for a TDC exchange in our HD patients. The urokinase lock is dwelled for at least 2 hours, after which aspiration and catheter testing will be done by a trained HD nurse.

Intervention Type DRUG

Urokinase

20,000unit (1ml) is instilled per catheter lumen (in both arterial and venous ports respectively); and the remaining 1ml is discarded.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

High dose urokinase Standard dose urokinase

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

Catheters eligible for the study include:

(i) Incident catheters that have never received urokinase; including newly inserted catheters for previously enrolled patients are allowed.

(ii) Prevalent catheters that have not received urokinase for the last 6 months


* Patients with TDC non-function, defined as no inflow and outflow from both arterial and venous ports upon catheter testing.
* Patients with contraindications to Urokinase including active internal bleeding; recent cerebrovascular accident (\< 2 months); recent intracranial or intraspinal surgery (\< 2 months); intracranial neoplasm, aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation; recent trauma, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation; recent gastrointestinal bleeding (\<2 months); known bleeding diathesis; severe uncontrolled hypertension; known hypersensitivity to Urokinase or any ingredient present in its formulation.
* Pregnancy.
* Tunneled dialysis catheter-related blood stream infection
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Healthcare Group, Singapore

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allen Liu Yan Lun

Senior Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chang DH, Mammadov K, Hickethier T, Borggrefe J, Hellmich M, Maintz D, Kabbasch C. Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jan 24;13:111-115. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S125130. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28182117 (View on PubMed)

Li Cavoli G, Schillaci O, Zagarrigo C, Servillo F, Li Cavoli TV, Palmeri M, Rotolo U. The urokinase lock-therapy for hemodialysis occluded central venous catheters. Blood Purif. 2015;39(1-3):238. doi: 10.1159/000381007. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25823425 (View on PubMed)

Donati G, Coli L, Cianciolo G, La Manna G, Cuna V, Montanari M, Gozzetti F, Stefoni S. Thrombosis of tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters: treatment with high-dose urokinase lock therapy. Artif Organs. 2012 Jan;36(1):21-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21848863 (View on PubMed)

Shavit L, Lifschitz M, Plaksin J, Grenader T, Slotki I. High dose urokinase for restoration of patency of occluded permanent central venous catheters in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2010 Oct;74(4):297-302. doi: 10.5414/cnp74297.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20875382 (View on PubMed)

Twardowski ZJ. High-dose intradialytic urokinase to restore the patency of permanent central vein hemodialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 May;31(5):841-7. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70054-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9590195 (View on PubMed)

Clase CM, Crowther MA, Ingram AJ, Cina CS. Thrombolysis for restoration of patency to haemodialysis central venous catheters: a systematic review. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001 Apr;11(2):127-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1011272632286.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11406727 (View on PubMed)

Mokrzycki MH, Lok CE. Traditional and non-traditional strategies to optimize catheter function: go with more flow. Kidney Int. 2010 Dec;78(12):1218-31. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.332. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20881943 (View on PubMed)

Mendes ML, Barretti P, da Silva TN, Ponce D. Approach to thrombotic occlusion related to long-term catheters of hemodialysis patients: a narrative review. J Bras Nefrol. 2015 Apr-Jun;37(2):221-7. doi: 10.5935/0101-2800.20150035. English, Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26154643 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Comparison of Standard versus

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AHEG2007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.