Preoperative Arteriovenous Fistula Simulation Study (ShuntSimulationStudy)

NCT ID: NCT02453412

Last Updated: 2019-08-22

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 236 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-05-31
• Study Completion Date: 2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are dependent on renal replacement therapy (dialysis). The majority of dialysis is facilitated by hemodialysis. For hemodialysis a vascular access is necessary, preferable an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in which a vein is directly anastomosed to an artery. In order to use the AVF for hemodialysis three criteria have to be met; the minimal flow over the AVF is 600 mL/min, the diameter is at least 6 mm, and the AVF is located less than 6 mm under the skin. Unfortunately, approximately half of the patients (50%) are confronted with an AVF that does not meet these criteria; the so called non-maturation or primary failure. In case of non-maturation the AVF is not only unusable for dialysis, but also requires reinterventions on short- and long-term. Firstly to mature the AVF, and secondly, when the AVF is matured, to keep the vascular access. Using a computational simulation postoperative flow can be predicted. Based on patient-specific duplex measurements, the model can calculate the flow that can be expected following vascular access surgery for all AVF configurations; fore- or upper arm. These calculations lead to an advice which configuration is indicated; a flow that exceeds 600 mL/min, leading to maturation. Potentially the aforementioned 50% of non-maturation can be reduced. The patient then has an adequate vascular access and reinterventions are adverted, resulting in a decrease of costs, hospital demand, and an increase of the patients' quality of life. When the expected reduction of non-maturation is confirmed, the computational tool can be offered to other hospitals.

Detailed Description

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major and growing healthcare problem associated with substantial costs. By the end of 2010 the global patient population requiring chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT) exceeds 2 million, of which approximately 90% relies on hemodialysis (HD). The number of patients dependent on RRT are expected to annually increase with 8%. Based on this figure, it is expected that in 2030, 7.3 million ESRD patients need HD treatment. To facilitate adequate HD therapy a reliable vascular access (VA) is mandatory and can be provided by either creation of an autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF), a prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG) or a central venous catheter (CVC). Guidelines by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF K/DOQI Guidelines), the Vascular Access Society (Good Nephrological Practice Guidelines) and the European Dialysis and Transplant Association (European Best Practice Guidelines on vascular access) advocate the implementation of an all-autologous fistula policy to maximize the use of AVF over AVG and CVC because AVF have the best long-term patency, fewer complications and require less interventions once fully maturated. Although the implementation of preoperative ultrasonography examination for vessel assessment has reduced the number of early AVF failure by improving the selection of the most suitable vessels and site for AVF creation, short- and long-term AVF dysfunction remains the major cause of morbidity and hospitalisation in HD patients, and is therefore the major limitation for HD treatment. This dysfunction is usually associated with non-maturation of the newly created AVF or the formation of neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) which potentially results in decreased access flow and eventual fistula thrombosis in up to 50% of AVFs. On the other hand, the low resistance vascular traject via the AVF may lead to impeded perfusion of the extremity distally of the AV anastomosis resulting in hand ischemia (HAIDI = Hemodialysis Access Induced Distal Ischemia), while an abundant AVF flow may lead to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy, both with potentially severe consequences. These high-flow complications occur in approximately 20% of fistulae. Numerous studies have investigated alternative preoperative mapping tools and criteria for reduction of AVF related complications. However, current clinical use of these individual tools and parameters does not take into account their potential interplay at a systemic level. Therefore one might consider that multiple prognostic parameters within a single patient are likely more valuable to improve outcome and therefore it is obvious to tailor the type of AVF to the individual patient. A possible solution to deal with multiple independent prognostic factors is implementation of a predictive patient-specific computational tool that relates geometrical, mechanical and hemodynamical parameters by means of physical laws. As a result, the computational tool takes the complex interplay between different prognostic parameters into consideration and accounts for individual differences in anatomy, physiology, demography and hemodynamics. Such an innovative computational tool opens new opportunities. By predicting postoperative flow abovementioned deleterious events can possibly be prevented. High-flow (>1500ml/min) and low-flow (<600ml/min) vascular access can then be predicted and consequently be rejected and a more suitable AVF-configuration chosen.

Consequently, simulation of outcome after AVF creation is at hand. Recently, the feasibility of VA computational simulation has been investigated and proven in the ARCH FP7 ICT-224390 project (ARCH; patient-specific image-based computational modeling for improvement of short- and long- term outcome of vascular access in patients on hemodialysis therapy). Within this technological and clinical study, longitudinal collection of cardiovascular data was performed with the intention to develop, calibrate and validate patient-specific modelling tools for surgical planning and assistance in the management of complications arising from AVF creation. Given the difficult and heterogeneous patient population, the study protocol was designed in such way that pre- and postoperative imaging could be performed strictly, aiming at complete datasets of structural, functional and demographical data. Although the computational simulation model has been validated in a small patient group, larger randomized observational patient studies, aiming at evaluating the potential beneficial effect of the use of computational tools in reducing AVF-related clinical problems, are needed.

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic; Arteriovenous Fistulae

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Control

Standard care in operative planning in AVF creation, that is physical examination and extensive duplex examination of the arm vasculature carried out by an experience vascular technician.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Simulation

Standard care with the intervention of advisement of the preferred AVF-configuration, based on computational model simulation for predicting postoperative flow (AVF-simulation).

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

AVF-simulation

Intervention Type: DEVICE

A mathematical computational tool, which is developed to calculate estimates for postoperative AVF hemodynamical changes in the upper extremity. The model is based on physical laws and calculations are carried out on patient-specific duplex measurements.

Interventions

AVF-simulation

A mathematical computational tool, which is developed to calculate estimates for postoperative AVF hemodynamical changes in the upper extremity. The model is based on physical laws and calculations are carried out on patient-specific duplex measurements.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Incident patients that enter the pre-dialysis program because of end-stage renal failure and need for vascular access.
• Permanent dialysis patients in need of a new VA in the contralateral arm because of a previous failed access.
• Patients in which treatment of first choice is the creation of an autologous AVF.
• Patients with adequate arteries and veins (duplex) for creation of RC-, BC- or BBAVF.
• Patients that signed the written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with contraindications for creation of an autologous AVF (skin infection, ischemia, heart failure)
• Patients with a previous vascular access in the ipsilateral arm.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Maastricht University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Niek Zonnebeld, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Jan Tordoir, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Wouter Huberts, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Tammo Delhaas, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Flevoziekenhuis

Almere Stad, Flevoland, Netherlands

Maasstad Ziekenhuis

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Slingeland ziekenhuis

Doetinchem, , Netherlands

Catharina ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Zuyderland

Heerlen, , Netherlands

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, , Netherlands

St. Antonius ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Laurentius ziekenhuis

Roermond, , Netherlands

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Countries

Netherlands

References

Zonnebeld N, Huberts W, van Loon MM, Delhaas T, Tordoir JH. Preoperative computer simulation for planning of vascular access surgery in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 6;18(Suppl. 1):118-124. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000661. Epub 2017 Mar 5.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 28297050 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

NL51610.068.14

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NT12.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id