Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Coronal Mode Ultrasound Guided Hemodialysis Cannulation: Comparison With Standard Cannulation Technique
NCT02814721
Correlation of Ultrasonographic Lesion Type Characterization With Angioplasty Outcomes in Failing Dialysis AVFs
NCT06119100
Ultrasound for Guidewire Detection
NCT03727581
Home Hemodialysis Assisted by a Nurse for Arterio-venous Fistula Cannulation
NCT03633435
Training Procedural Simulation of Nurses in Reducing Complications Related to Arteriovenous Fistula Puncture
NCT03680209
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ultrasound (US) is routinely used in many hospitals and many dialysis units will have access to a machine to assess patients for problems. Indeed central venous line insertions for dialysis are now almost always performed under US guidance since two large studies in this area in 2002 provided strong evidence that US guided placement significantly reduces complications during catheter placement and a reduction in the number of attempts at insertion. In addition the National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK provided evidence that insertion time is quicker although this association was statistically less convincing.
Ultrasound offers the advantage of dynamic imaging without the risks of radiation exposure and can be done as an office based procedure using portable equipment.
Studies in emergency departments and particularly in paediatric care have suggested that US guidance can improve the speed and accuracy of cannulation in peripheral veins for intravenous access.
We suggest that US guided cannulation of fistulas might improve the cannulation rate of more difficult fistulas and potentially reduce the time required to commence dialysis and the number of local complications of cannulation (haematoma/aneurysm/infection).
To our knowledge US is not used in cannulation guidance in any dialysis units, although most units will have access to a machine as above. We therefore propose to perform a randomised controlled trial of US guided cannulation of fistulas versus current practice (blind cannulation) to assess the effectiveness of US controlled cannulation in a busy dialysis unit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Blind cannulation
Cannulation without guidance
No interventions assigned to this group
Ultrasound guided cannulation
Ultrasound guided cannulation
Use of ultrasound guidance in cannulation
Use of guidance with duplex ultrasound to complete cannulation of dialysis access
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Use of ultrasound guidance in cannulation
Use of guidance with duplex ultrasound to complete cannulation of dialysis access
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Dialysing via 2 needles in fistula
3. No deviation from routine dialysis protocol (additional or no heparin etc)
Exclusion Criteria
Withdrawal criteria:
1. Patient request
2. Patient non compliance with study protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hull
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George E Smith, BSc MBBS MRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, East Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Access 5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.