Comparing the Hemodiafiltration On-line and Conventional Hemodialysis in Terms of Cost-benefit
NCT ID: NCT02374372
Last Updated: 2022-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients, who had previously been randomized in the CONTRAST study, will remain in their respective group and monitoring will continue. The next patients will be randomized in the same way (1: 1) using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. HDF randomized patients will receive post-dilution standard reinjection (at least 100ml/min or 6 liter/hr). In rare cases, HDF patients can briefly have reinjection on a pre-dilution mode (if heparin need to be avoided for example) and the reinjection flow should be adjusted accordingly (200ml/min).
Length and frequency of sessions will be the same in the 2 groups. Blood tests will not change and will be the same than those used as routine assessments. Metabolic control of patients will be maintained according to the guidelines. Patients will be monitored for a minimum of 3 years. A set of demographic and clinical data will be collected from patient medical records and throughout the study.
Biochemical data as part of the usual blood tests of dialysis patients will be collected each month as well as will be stored and analyzed information about the annual cardiac ultrasounds.
All events will be scored (hospitalizations, patterns, duration) and the list and cost of drugs will be compiled every three months. These data will be useful in the economic analysis comparing the two treatment modalities.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hemodiafiltration Versus Hemodialysis in Older People
NCT07278973
Online Hemodiafiltration vs Conventional Hemodialysis in Acute Kidney Injury
NCT04525092
Expanded Hemodialysis Versus Online Hemodiafiltration
NCT03274518
Protein-bound Toxin Removal Between Limited Blood Flow Super High-flux Online HDF and High-Efficiency Online HDF
NCT03288922
Tolerance of "on Line" Hemodiafiltration in Chronic Renal Failure Patients
NCT01327391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional hemodialysis
conventional hemodialysis
conventional hemodialysis
hemodiafiltration On-line
hemodiafiltration On-line
hemodiafiltration On-line
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conventional hemodialysis
hemodiafiltration On-line
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to consent,
* patient needs to be on hemodialysis more than 8-12 hours a week (2-3 sessions)
Exclusion Criteria
* life expectation less than 3 months,
* treated with high-flux filters in the last 6 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE10.253
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.