Neurostimulation and Electromyographs Assessment of th TetraGraph in Healthy (Volunteers
NCT ID: NCT02630576
Last Updated: 2017-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurostimulation and Electromyographic Assessment of the TetraGraph (NEAT) In Patients (NEAT-3)
NCT02241304
Electromyographic Assessment of the TetraGraph in Normal Volunteers
NCT02912039
An Evaluation of the Neuromuscular Junction in Neonates Using the TetraGraph
NCT07133412
Electromyographic Monitoring and Postoperative Recovery
NCT03891381
Influence of Electrode Positioning and Current Type on Fatigue, Force and Discomfort
NCT04200677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Men - Left Hand
5 healthy male volunteers undergoing 4 types of neuromuscular stimulation protocols on the left hand
Neuromuscular stimulation
Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity
Men - Right Hand
5 healthy male volunteers undergoing 4 types of neuromuscular stimulation protocols on the right hand
Neuromuscular stimulation
Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity
Women - Left Hand
5 healthy female volunteers undergoing 4 types of neuromuscular stimulation protocols on the left hand
Neuromuscular stimulation
Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity
Women - Right Hand
5 healthy female volunteers undergoing 4 types of neuromuscular stimulation protocols on the right hand
Neuromuscular stimulation
Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuromuscular stimulation
Single twitch and train-of-four stimulation protocols will be performed at the randomised side with growing current intensity
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Volunteer is American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III (Tabl
* Volunteer has provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of medications known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission
* Presence of renal or hepatic disease
* Subject has only one upper extremity
* Subject has open sores at the skin sites needed for electrode application
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Debrecen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tamas Vegh, MD
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bela Fulesdi, MD,PhD,DSci
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN FACULTY OF MEDICINE Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Debrecen
Debrecen, , Hungary
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gatke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, Jensen FS, Skovgaard LT. Postoperative muscle paralysis after rocuronium: less residual block when acceleromyography is used. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Feb;46(2):207-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460216.x.
Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, Vandenbroucke G, Deloof T. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):426-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195543.61123.1f.
Kim KS, Lew SH, Cho HY, Cheong MA. Residual paralysis induced by either vecuronium or rocuronium after reversal with pyridostigmine. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1656-60, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00033.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268.
Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;54(1):58-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03021901.
Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):352-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199308000-00024.
Grayling M, Sweeney BP. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia. 2007 Aug;62(8):806-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05101.x.
Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jun;108(6):1117-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f.
Connelly NR, Silverman DG, O'Connor TZ, Brull SJ. Subjective responses to train-of-four and double burst stimulation in awake patients. Anesth Analg. 1990 Jun;70(6):650-3. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199006000-00012.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
028605-010/2014/OTIG
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DE RKEB/IKEB4170-2014
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ADBV-ABS-0214-NEAT-2H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.