Agitated Saline, Albumin, or Propofol-albumin Mixture for Enhanced Contrast in TEE Examinations

NCT ID: NCT02613052

Last Updated: 2019-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study to determine if albumin and propofol or albumin only will provide superior qualitative contrast enhancement during TEE bubble studies compared to agitated saline. Each patient will receive three randomized bubble studies (agitated saline, albumin, and albumin and propofol) using 10 ml of agitated contrast agent. The albumin and propofol mixture will consist of 7 mL of 5% albumin plus 3 mL of propofol (10 mg/mL). Each patient will undergo qualitative review of all 3 bubble studies by 10 different anesthesiologists and/or cardiologists credentialed to read echocardiographic studies at the time of the surgical procedure, and also with retrospective review of the echo video (\~200 studies). A bicaval view will be obtained to record a 20 beat loop for each bubble study. Hemodynamic variables prior to injection of contrast agent; and 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minutes after injection will be monitored and recorded.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study to determine if albumin and propofol or albumin only will provide superior qualitative contrast enhancement during TEE bubble studies compared to the current standard of care contrast agent, agitated saline. The study will take place in the Operating Rooms (OR) at the UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center. The TEE studies will be reviewed by UCSD Anesthesiology or Cardiology faculty who are credentialed to read and interpret echocardiographic studies.

The study population will consist of 20 English-speaking patients and all will receive two doses of contrast, namely agitated albumin or propofol and albumin mixture, undergoing cardiac surgery who require TEE. Each patient will undergo qualitative review by 10 anesthesiologists and/or cardiologists credentialed to read echocardiographic studies at the time of the surgical procedure, and also with retrospective review of the echo video. The multiple reviewers per patient will increase the power of the study (\~200 studies). Each patient will receive three bubble studies using 10 ml of agitated contrast agent as named above. The order in which each contrast agent is utilized, as well as the experimental contrast agent, is randomized and the interpreting physician is blinded to this information. Agitated saline (AS) alone will be used as a (third dose) control for each patient, which is the current standard contrast agent for TEE bubble studies. The other bubble studies will use an experimental agitated contrast agent, either a mixture of 7 mL albumin and 3 mL propofol (10 mg/ml) or 10 mL albumin (human). Saline and albumin 5% are intravenous fluids FDA approved for the use in restoration and maintenance of circulating of blood volume. Propofol is FDA approved for the use in induction or maintenance of general anesthesia.

The anesthesia care team, as per the standard care during UCSD cardiac surgical procedures, will place a TEE probe after induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. During the initial TEE exam, a bicaval view will be obtained. Both the order and type of experimental agitated contrast agent will be randomized and blinded to the sonographer and reviewer. A 20 beat loop will be recorded for each bubble study. Hemodynamic variables prior to injection of contrast agent; and 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minutes after injection are monitored and recorded. All recorded data will be anonymized prior to review. TEE is standard of care and routinely used in the care of cardiac surgery patients and is not performed solely for this study.

All anesthetic, surgical and medical interventions will be chosen and carried out by the surgical and anesthesia teams, including those involving invasive monitor placement, fluid administration, ventilator management and patient positioning.

Appropriate statistical analysis will be utilized to evaluate the difference in contrast enhancement in the saline only, albumin, and albumin and propofol groups.

The results of the study will be published in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transesophageal Echocardiography Contrast Agents

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Agitated Normal Saline

Agitated saline is the current standard of care contrast agent used for bubble studies. 10 mL of agitated normal saline will be used for the bubble study.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mL of normal saline agitated prior to IV administration

Albumin only

10 mL of agitated 5% albumin will be used for the bubbly study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

human albumin

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mL of 5% albumin agitated prior to IV administration

Albumin and Propofol

7 mL of 5% albumin and 3 mL of propofol (10 mg/mL) will be agitated together and used for the bubble study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

human albumin and propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

7 mL of 5% albumin mixed with 3 mL of propofol (10 mg/mL) agitated together prior to IV administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

normal saline

10 mL of normal saline agitated prior to IV administration

Intervention Type DRUG

human albumin

10 mL of 5% albumin agitated prior to IV administration

Intervention Type DRUG

human albumin and propofol

7 mL of 5% albumin mixed with 3 mL of propofol (10 mg/mL) agitated together prior to IV administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sodium chloride Diprivan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cardiac surgical patients requiring a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)

Exclusion Criteria

* allergy to propofol
* inability to place a TEE probe
* inability to obtain a TEE bicaval image
* known right to left intracardiac shunt
* pt refusal to accept human blood products including albumin
* pt refusal to participate in study
* vulnerable patients (pregnant women, prisoners, cognitively impaired, or institutionalized)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Swapnil Khoche

Assistand Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Swapnil Khoche, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Diego

Ryan YS Suda, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of California, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC San Diego Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Meerbaum S. Introduction and general background. In: Myocardial Contrast Two-Dimensional Echocardiography, Meerbaum S, Meltzer R (Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 1989. p.2

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Stewart MJ. Contrast echocardiography. Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):342-8. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.342. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12591856 (View on PubMed)

Attaran RR, Ata I, Kudithipudi V, Foster L, Sorrell VL. Protocol for optimal detection and exclusion of a patent foramen ovale using transthoracic echocardiography with agitated saline microbubbles. Echocardiography. 2006 Aug;23(7):616-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00272.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16911341 (View on PubMed)

Unger EC, Porter T, Culp W, Labell R, Matsunaga T, Zutshi R. Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 May 7;56(9):1291-314. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.12.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15109770 (View on PubMed)

Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Bierig SM, Burns PN, Castello R, Coon PD, Hagen ME, Jollis JG, Kimball TR, Kitzman DW, Kronzon I, Labovitz AJ, Lang RM, Mathew J, Moir WS, Nagueh SF, Pearlman AS, Perez JE, Porter TR, Rosenbloom J, Strachan GM, Thanigaraj S, Wei K, Woo A, Yu EH, Zoghbi WA; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov;21(11):1179-201; quiz 1281. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18992671 (View on PubMed)

Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25085408 (View on PubMed)

Shapiro JR, Reisner SA, Lichtenberg GS, Meltzer RS. Intravenous contrast echocardiography with use of sonicated albumin in humans: systolic disappearance of left ventricular contrast after transpulmonary transmission. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Dec;16(7):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90308-c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2254545 (View on PubMed)

Davison P, Clift PF, Steeds RP. The role of echocardiography in diagnosis, monitoring closure and post-procedural assessment of patent foramen ovale. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Dec;11(10):i27-34. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq120.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21078836 (View on PubMed)

Baker MT, Naguib M. Propofol: the challenges of formulation. Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):860-76. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16192780 (View on PubMed)

de Jong N, Emmer M, van Wamel A, Versluis M. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Aug;47(8):861-73. doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0497-1. Epub 2009 May 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19468770 (View on PubMed)

Kitzman DW, Goldman ME, Gillam LD, Cohen JL, Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS. Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardiographic images. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Sep 15;86(6):669-74. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01050-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10980221 (View on PubMed)

Dewhirst E, et al. The Use of a Propofol-Saline Mixture for Enhanced Contrast in Bubble Studies During Echocardiographic Examinations. Society of Pediatric Anesthesia Meeting (Winter 2012).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Geny B, Mettauer B, Muan B, Bischoff P, Epailly E, Piquard F, Eisenmann B, Haberey P. Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary echo contrast agent in echocardiographic studies in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):1193-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90437-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8409060 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

151360

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

'Bubble Time' in Pulmonary Embolism
NCT07098546 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING