Pulmonary Embolism: Multifunctional Assessment of Prognosis
NCT ID: NCT01113775
Last Updated: 2010-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary aim of the study is to assess the prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by spiral CT scan.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Assiut University Hospital.
NCT06647706
Influence of Diagnostic Errors on the Prognosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
NCT03101384
Assessment of Right Ventricular Function After Acute Pulmonary Embolism Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography
NCT04609605
Clinical Echography in Emergency Prognostic Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: ECU -EP Study.
NCT03366519
Prognostic Tools in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism.
NCT04237974
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A number of studies reported in favor of the association between echocardiographic RVD and early adverse outcome (PE recurrence and mortality) in patients with acute PE (3-6). In-hospital mortality in PE patients with and without echocardiographic RVD has been found to be 18.4% and 5.7%, respectively, regardless of the hemodinamic status (3). In 126 patients with acute pulmonary embolism, Ribeiro et al. reported a 7.9% overall in-hospital mortality (7). Mortality was 14.3% in patients with severe RVD. In a cohort of 2454 unselected patients with acute pulmonary embolism included in the ICOPER registry, 2-week mortality was 15.9% in patients presenting with RVD in comparison to 8% in patients without RVD (8). In the MAPPET 10% of patients with RVD died within 30 days as compared to 4.1% of patients without (9). Recent data confirmed that patients with objectively confirmed PE, normal BP and echocardiographic evidence of RVD have a high incidence of adverse outcome and may potentially benefit from more aggressive treatment (10).
Troponin I and T levels have also been described to be associated with in-hospital mortality and adverse in-hospital outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (13-15).
In small studies with helical CT, the ratio of the right ventricle to left ventricle short axis diameters (RV/LV) has been proposed as an accurate sign for the presence of RVD (16-19). In addition, other criteria have been proposed, including deviation of the interventricular septum and the ratio of the pulmonary artery to ascending aorta diameters. Also, the extent of PE (ie, thrombus burden in the pulmonary arteries) has been proposed as an important parameter for predicting RVD (20-21). In a recent retrospective study in 120 patients with pulmonary embolism, seven patients died of PE. Both the RV/LV ratio and the obstruction index were shown to be significant risk factors for 3-month mortality (p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). No such relationship was found for the ratio of the pulmonary artery to ascending aorta diameters (p= 0.66) or for the shape of the interventricular septum (p = 0.20). The positive predictive value for PE-related mortality with an RV/LV ratio greater than 1.0 was 10.1% (95% confidence interval \[CI\]: 2.9%, 17.4%). The negative predictive value for an uneventful outcome with an RV/LV ratio of 1.0 or less was 100% (95% CI: 94.3%, 100%). There was a 11.2-fold increased risk of dying of PE for patients with an obstruction index of 40% or higher (95% CI: 1.3, 93.6). The CT obstruction index (29% ± 17%) and the Miller index (43% ± 25%) were well correlated (r = 0.867, p \< 0.0001) with an excellent concordance between investigators for both the CT index (r = 0.944, p \< 0.0001) and the Miller index (r = 0.904, p \< 0.0001). A CT obstruction index greater than 40% identified more than 90% of patients with right ventricular dilatation.
Aim of the study The primary aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of spiral CT scan to detect right ventricular dysfunction as compared to current 'gold standard'. At the purpose of this study right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and serum levels of troponin are considered as gold standard.
The secondary aim of the study is to assess the prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by spiral CT scan.
Feasibility In order to reach 200 evaluable patients, the Radiology Units of the participating centers will be asked to alert local investigators regarding all the patients with CT scan positive for acute pulmonary embolism. Local investigators should take care of organizing transthoracic echocardiography and troponin levels.
Four centers are required in order to complete the study in one year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
presence of right ventricle dysfunction
No interventions assigned to this group
absence of right ventricle dysfunction
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinical Research Unit
AMBIG
University Of Perugia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Perugia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cecilia Becattini, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Of Perugia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine Department
Perugia, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRU Unipg 02-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.