Optimizing Protocols for the Individual Patient in CT Pulmonary Angiography.

NCT ID: NCT02611115

Last Updated: 2017-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

235 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). PE is a potentially fatal disease in which a thrombus is lodged into a pulmonary artery blocking blood flow and potentially leading to respiratory distress, acute right cardiac failure or death. Therefore early and correct diagnosis is crucial.

The diagnostic and clinical value of CTPA has already been firmly substantiated. Unfortunately up to 7.3% of PE scans are still deemed to be non-diagnostic, for example due to insufficient contrast enhancement in the target arteries.

Therefore future research should focus on two important aspects of CT imaging. On the one hand optimal enhancement for the individual patient, on the other hand preventing additional risk of CT imaging - namely contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and radiation risk. Thus the purpose of our study will be to optimize radiation dose settings (e.g. tube voltage, tube current) and CM application for the individual patient in CTPA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Suspicion of pulmonary embolism

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe allergy against Iopromide or any of the ingredients, previous severe CM reaction (according to current ESUR guidelines), renal insufficiency, pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marco Das

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-4-167

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id