Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED II)

NCT ID: NCT00007085

Last Updated: 2016-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-09-30

Study Completion Date

2004-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the value of contrast enhanced spiral computed tomography (spiral CT) for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Approximately 600,000 Americans sustain pulmonary embolism each year; one-third of these episodes are fatal. Unfortunately, pulmonary embolism is underdiagnosed and, therefore, under-treated. A substantial body of evidence suggests that the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is not made in the majority of patients in whom it causes or contributes to death.

In the main, there are two explanations for the failure to diagnose pulmonary embolism: pulmonary embolism may be clinically silent, and there is no definitive, noninvasive diagnostic test. Indeed, ventilation perfusion lung scans are nondiagnostic in the majority of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary angiography may be used to establish a diagnosis in such patients, but it is underutilized because of a mortality risk around 1 percent.

Recently, relatively small studies have suggested that contrast enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) scanning is a useful diagnostic test for pulmonary embolism, with sensitivity as high as 80 percent and specificity as high as 95 percent. Spiral CT is widely available and much less invasive than pulmonary angiography. If spiral CT could be established as a useful diagnostic test, pulmonary embolism would be diagnosed more effectively and more patients would receive proper treatment.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The study evaluates the role of spiral CT scan in the diagnosis of PE by comparison with a composite reference test, including pulmonary angiography, V/Q lung scan in patients without prior PE and compression ultrasound of the lower extremities in patients with no prior deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Diseases Pulmonary Embolism Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tomography, X-ray Computed

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\> 18% normal kidney function, no dye allergies, suspected of acute pulmonary embolism
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah Fowler

Role:

George Washington University

Charles Hales

Role:

Massachusetts General Hospital

Russell Hull

Role:

University of Calgary

Kenneth Leeper

Role:

Emory University

John Popovich

Role:

Case Western Reserve Univ-Henry Ford HSC

Henry Sostman

Role:

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Paul Stein

Role:

St. Joseph Mercy

Victor Tapson

Role:

Duke University

John Weg

Role:

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Pamela Woodard

Role:

Washington University School of Medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Goodman LR, Sostman HD. Overview of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II. Semin Nucl Med. 2002 Jul;32(3):173-82. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2002.124177.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12105798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U01HL063942

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adjust-Unlikely PE
NCT05708794 COMPLETED
Detection of Pulmonary Embolism With CECT
NCT00351754 COMPLETED PHASE4
PET Fibrin Imaging of DVT and PE
NCT04022915 RECRUITING PHASE1