Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism Testing Multicentre Study

NCT ID: NCT06320236

Last Updated: 2024-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

4000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is important to diagnose pulmonary embolism in a timely manner to prevent death and long-term disability. More than half a million people (4-5% of emergency department patients) are tested for pulmonary embolism, although the positive rate is low. Imaging for PE testing exposes patients to radiation, is expensive, adds time to the emergency visit, and can lead to a false positive diagnoses. Existing protocols aimed at reducing unnecessary pulmonary embolism imaging are complex and seldom used by emergency physicians. Too many patients undergo unnecessary pulmonary embolism imaging.

A new tool (called Adjust-Unlikely) could safely reduce pulmonary embolism imaging in Canada. A research group composed of researchers, emergency physicians, and patients developed the Adjust-Unlikely clinical decision rule: a rule which has been customized for emergency physicians and emergency patients. Adjust-Unlikely is highly sensitive at the bedside, meaning there are very few false negative results.

The study aim is to prospectively validate Adjust-Unlikely pulmonary embolism testing in emergency patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism D-dimer Diagnosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emergency department patients tested for pulmonary embolism.

Adjust-Unlikely

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Pulmonary embolism will be excluded during emergency department assessment by the combination of:

1. 'Pulmonary embolism is the most likely diagnosis' as per the treating physician AND a D-dimer result \< 500 ug/L fibrinogen equivalent units;
2. 'Pulmonary embolism is not the most likely diagnosis' AND D-dimer \< age-adjusted threshold; or,
3. A negative computed tomography scan, planar ventilation perfusion scan or ventilation perfusion-SPECT.

Emergency departments will use their local laboratory D-dimer assay.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Adjust-Unlikely

Pulmonary embolism will be excluded during emergency department assessment by the combination of:

1. 'Pulmonary embolism is the most likely diagnosis' as per the treating physician AND a D-dimer result \< 500 ug/L fibrinogen equivalent units;
2. 'Pulmonary embolism is not the most likely diagnosis' AND D-dimer \< age-adjusted threshold; or,
3. A negative computed tomography scan, planar ventilation perfusion scan or ventilation perfusion-SPECT.

Emergency departments will use their local laboratory D-dimer assay.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Emergency department patient who is tested by an emergency physician for PE

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is \< 18 years of age
* No documentation of whether PE is the most likely diagnosis
* D-dimer is not tested or else not resulted during the emergency visit
* The D-dimer level is known before documentation of whether PE is the most likely diagnosis
* The D-dimer is ordered prior to the physician assessing the patient
* The patient has previously registered that they opt out of all research at the participating site
* The patient leaves against medical advice
* The patient has had PE or deep vein thrombosis imaging (CT pulmonary angiogram, ventilation-perfusion scan or lower limb ultrasound) within prior 30 days
* There is a new (non-PE) indication for anticoagulation
* The patient was initiated on treatment for presumed PE prior to PE testing
* The patient has previously been enrolled into the study
* The patient has a prior history of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis without availability of a baseline ultrasound scan
* The patient was transferred from another hospital organization
* The patient does not reside in Ontario
* The patient has no valid Ontario Health Insurance Plan card
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Kerstin de Wit

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Kerstin de Wit

Clinician Investigator Program Director & Research Director for the Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kerstin de Wit, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queens University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Natasha S Clayton, CRA, RA

Role: CONTACT

4165663590

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Natasha Clayton, CRA, RA

Role: primary

4165663590

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.