Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED)

NCT ID: NCT00000566

Last Updated: 2016-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1983-09-30

Study Completion Date

1989-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of two major, widely used technologies, radionuclear imaging (ventilation-perfusion scanning) and pulmonary angiography, for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

In 1983, reliable data on the incidence of pulmonary embolism in the adult population and in groups identified at risk were not available because the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic procedures had not been determined. Estimates suggested there were about half a million episodes of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients each year in the United States. Deaths attributable to pulmonary embolism would be expected in about one third of these patients if left untreated.

The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was subject to a high frequency of false positives and false negatives. The most definitive diagnostic procedure was pulmonary angiography, an invasive, expensive procedure which was not without risk. It required specialized equipment and highly trained personnel both for performance and for interpretation. Therefore, it was used to diagnose pulmonary embolism only in the major medical centers. Another technique utilized as a method to diagnose pulmonary embolism involved a combination of perfusion and ventilation scanning; this method was only minimally invasive. A normal perfusion scan was thought to be of considerable value because it essentially excluded the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. In selected patient populations, abnormal perfusion scans combined with normal ventilation scans were of substantial help in diagnosis.

Although there had been no acceptable validation of the use of perfusion scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, thousands of patients had been evaluated for pulmonary embolism based on perfusion scanning often using methods of imaging now considered to be inadequate. In the early 1980s, clinical practice interpreted a negative perfusion scan as overwhelming evidence against the presence of pulmonary emboli. This interpretation had not been adequately tested either in a prospective study or by long-term follow-up of patients to determine clinical outcome. With regards to positive perfusion scans, there were data to suggest that as many as two-thirds of positive perfusion scans could not subsequently be confirmed by pulmonary angiography. Prospective studies in which timely angiograms using selective injections and improved imaging techniques were needed to evaluate the usefulness of positive perfusion scans.

Phase I was initiated in September 1983. Protocols developed during Phase I underwent independent assessment review in April 1984 and were reviewed and approved by the May 1984 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. Recruitment and intervention started in January 1985 and ended in September 1986. Follow-up was completed on September 30, 1987.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Patients suspected of pulmonary embolism underwent a ventilation-perfusion scan. Patients with an abnormal perfusion scan underwent angiography. All patients were followed for one year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Diseases Pulmonary Embolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ventilation-perfusion ratio

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Men and women suspected of having a pulmonary embolism and who met the criteria to undergo angiography.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abass Alavi

Role:

University of Pennsylvania

Richard Greenspan

Role:

Yale University

Charles Hales

Role:

Massachusetts General Hospital

Herbert Saltzman

Role:

Duke University

Paul Stein

Role:

Henry Ford Hospital

John Weg

Role:

University of Michigan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Henry JW, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Raskob GE. Pulmonary embolism among patients with a nearly normal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):395-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.2.395.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8697840 (View on PubMed)

Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B. Can pulmonary angiography be limited to the most suspicious side if the contralateral side appears normal on the ventilation/perfusion lung scan? Data from PIOPED. Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):392-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.2.392.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8697839 (View on PubMed)

Tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. A collaborative study by the PIOPED Investigators. Chest. 1990 Mar;97(3):528-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.3.528.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2106408 (View on PubMed)

PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440200057023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2332918 (View on PubMed)

Bone RC. Ventilation/perfusion scan in pulmonary embolism. 'The Emperor is incompletely attired'. JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2794-5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2185372 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA, Terrin ML. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;18(6):1452-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90674-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1939945 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Alavi A, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Saltzman HA, Vreim CE, Weg JG. Usefulness of noninvasive diagnostic tools for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal chest radiograph. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 15;67(13):1117-20. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90875-l.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2024602 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Coleman RE, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA, Terrin ML, Weg JG. Diagnostic utility of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism is not diminished by pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):604-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.604.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1889240 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, Palevsky HI, Saltzman HA, Thompson BT, Weg JG. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):598-603. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.598.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1909617 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Saltzman HA, Weg JG. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Dec 15;68(17):1723-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90339-m. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1746481 (View on PubMed)

Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Greenspan RH, Henry JW. Relation of plain chest radiographic findings to pulmonary arterial pressure and arterial blood oxygen levels in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):394-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90240-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1734655 (View on PubMed)

Quinn DA, Thompson BT, Terrin ML, Thrall JH, Athanasoulis CA, McKusick KA, Stein PD, Hales CA. A prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism in women and men. JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1689-96.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1527878 (View on PubMed)

Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS, Thompson BT, Popovich J Jr, Hobbins TE, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992 May 7;326(19):1240-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199205073261902.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1560799 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set

NHLBI provides controlled access to IPD through BioLINCC. Access requires registration, evidence of local IRB approval or certification of exemption from IRB review, and completion of a data use agreement.

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Study Forms

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

204

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.