Taenia Solium Elimination Versus Control: What is the Best Way Forward for Sub-Saharan Africa?
NCT ID: NCT02612896
Last Updated: 2023-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2900 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2022-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The scattered efforts of researchers into evaluation of control programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have focussed on single control options. It is becoming clear that these stand-alone options have the potential to reduce the occurrence of the parasite, however either long term or more integrated efforts seem to be required to reach an elimination status.
The objective of the current study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness/acceptability of elimination (to be achieved on a short term via integrated measures), and control (single measures, with an elimination goal on a longer term) of T. solium in a highly endemic area in SSA.
This intervention study will entail an elimination study arm in which multiple control options are combined (integrated) aiming at the final human host (Mass drug administration (MDA) and health education) and pig intermediate hosts (pig treatment and vaccination). In a second study arm a single control option will be carried out (pig treatment). In both study arms (health) education will be implemented. At baseline and in the final sampling year, prevalence of human taeniosis/cysticercosis and porcine cysticercosis will be determined in all study villages. Active ongoing surveillance and 6 monthly (biannual) human and pig sampling will be conducted in the elimination study arm, as well as two-yearly (biennial) sampling of the pig intermediate host in the control study arm. Additionally, (open ended) questionnaires and focus group discussions will be administered/held to obtain data on the cost of pig keeping, T. solium, the interventions and the perception/acceptability of the proposed control measures to the local communities.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigation of Environmental Factors Associated With Transmission of T. Solium in Endemic Villages of Zambia
NCT03874689
Taenia Solium Control Case Study in Zambia
NCT01368354
Integrating Community Interventions to Eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases
NCT03667079
Assessment of Combined Praziquantel and Albendazole vs Albendazole Alone to Treat Active Parenchymal Neurocysticercosis
NCT06376396
Worm Infestation and Child Health in Zimbabwe
NCT01283165
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two communities were selected that fulfilled all of the eligibility criteria. The Nyembe neighbourhood community (1,210 people, 5 villages, 520 pigs), within the Nyembe Rural Health Centre (RHC) catchment was selected for the elimination study arm; and Chimvira neighbourhood community (1,470 people, 11 villages, 827 pigs), in the Mtandaza Rural Health Centre catchment, was selected for the control study arm.
The interventional study will entail a high-input elimination study arm (E), in which multiple control options targeting both the final (human, mass drug administration, health education) and intermediate (pig) hosts (treatment and vaccination), are combined; and a lower-input control study arm (CI), which will use a single control option targeting only the porcine host (treatment).
Teams of suitably qualified and trained human and veterinary medical staff will go from door-to-door to each household in the study communities.
Procedures will include collection of both qualitative and quantitative data from human participants and pigs; subject-related interventions in both human participants and pigs; and laboratory analysis of collected samples.
For the baseline surveys, one randomly-selected consenting adult member and one randomly-selected assenting (and parental consent) child member (above 5 years) from each household will be sampled (serum: diagnosis of human cysticercosis; and stool: diagnosis of taeniasis), whereas for all subsequent surveys in the elimination arm (see protocol for specific time points), all eligible consenting members of the elimination communities will be invited to participate (stool samples: diagnosis of taeniasis). All eligible consenting members from the control arm will be included at the final study sampling (stool: diagnosis of taeniasis and serum: diagnosis of cysticercosis). It is expected that all age, sex and socioeconomic groups will be equally represented.
For the socio-economic questionnaires, 50% of the households will be randomly selected and the head of the household addressed.
The school based questionnaire will be administered to grade 5-6 children attending school in each of the study communities.
For the perception questionnaires: here also 50% of the households will be targeted (random selection), until data saturation has been reached.
For the focus group discussions (FGD): 6 FGD (3 with each time 10 men, 3 with each time 10 women) will be conducted in the elimination study arm, 12 in the control study arm (6 iterations involving 10 men and 6 iterations involving 10 women), at defined time points (table 1), until data saturation has been reached.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Elimination arm
Both human and porcine interventions at four-monthly intervals in the first two study years, for a total of six iterations (only human interventions will be detailed here):
Human: Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg, according to the list of WHO recommended anthelmintic drugs for use in preventive chemotherapy for taeniasis. And Health Education
Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg
see previous, in elimination study arm only
Health education
in all study arms, using village meetings, posters, pamphlets.
Control intervention arm
Human: yearly health education, for a total of five iterations. The intervention on the pig host will not be detailed here)
Health education
in all study arms, using village meetings, posters, pamphlets.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mass drug administration, praziquantel 10mg/kg
see previous, in elimination study arm only
Health education
in all study arms, using village meetings, posters, pamphlets.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willing and able to provide informed consent (signature or thumb print with impartial witness; assent for minors with parental consent).
* Living in, attending school in, or regularly visiting the bore holes present in, the study communities
* Aged five years of age or older
* People without epilepsy
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling or unable to provide written (signature or thumb print with impartial witness) informed consent (or assent for minors)
* Living outside of, and not regularly visiting, or attending school in, the study communities
* Children aged four years or younger
* People with epilepsy (identified cases by the Rural Health Centre, questions included in the registration procedure)
* Seriously ill individuals (people unable to engage in the normal activities of daily living without assistance because of their illnesses)
5 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zambia
OTHER
Ministry of Health, Zambia
OTHER_GOV
Université Catholique de Louvain
OTHER
University Ghent
OTHER
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre Dorny, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nyembe and Mtandaza Rural Health Centre
Katete, Eastern Province, Zambia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CYSTISTOP_2.2_07012016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.