Video Intervention to Enhance the Safety Of Cognitively Impaired Older Drivers

NCT ID: NCT02593552

Last Updated: 2016-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This pilot study was done to assess the feasibility and possible efficacy of a video feedback intervention to improve the safety of cognitively impaired older drivers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goals of this pilot study were to demonstrate that 1) g-force technology can effectively detect unsafe driving events by older adults, and 2) cognitively impaired older adults can improve their driving safety with an in-car video feedback intervention. Unsafe driving events were triggered by g-forces leading to capture of a video record that was then transmitted wirelessly to a remote office where the events were analyzed and scored. During the baseline phase (3 months), there was no feedback. During the intervention phase (4-6 months), participants received a weekly progress report in the mail along with DVD of recorded unsafe driving events with recommendations. The research team then contacted the participant and informant weekly to provide additional coaching, and verify that participants reviewed the information and videos. During the post-intervention monitoring phase (7-9 months), there was no further feedback. The primary quantitative outcomes were total number of unsafe driving events/1,000 miles and total safety driving score/1,000 miles. Secondary qualitative outcomes included the types and severity of unsafe driving events that were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Impaired Driving

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Video camera

DriveCam video event recorder with counseling feedback

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DriveCam

Intervention Type DEVICE

Video event monitoring device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DriveCam

Video event monitoring device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 60-90
* English speaking
* currently driving adults with a valid driving license and at least 10 years of driving experience
* neurological examinations judged to be normal for age or consistent with AD
* questionable to mild dementia (CDR 0.5 to 1)
* MMSE \< 28
* have an adult family member or other caregiver, age \>21 to participate in counseling feedback

Exclusion Criteria

* ophthalmologic, physical, or neurologic disorders other than dementia that impair their driving abilities
* visual acuity worse than 20/40 in best eye using distance vision measured by wall chart
* homonymous hemianopia or bitemporal hemianopia on confrontation testing
* musculoskeletal disorders causing major physical handicaps such as frozen joints, inadequately healed fractures, and amputations
* history of alcohol or substance abuse by DSM V diagnostic criteria within the past year
* sedating medications that impair level of consciousness or attention
* language impairment that would interfere with the ability to participate in the educational intervention
* previous road test evaluation or opinion of caregiver or health professional that subject is unsafe to drive.
Minimum Eligible Age

68 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rhode Island Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian Ott

Brian R. Ott, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ott BR, Davis JD, Bixby K. Video Feedback Intervention to Enhance the Safety of Older Drivers With Cognitive Impairment. Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Mar/Apr;71(2):7102260020p1-7102260020p7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.020404.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28218593 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

263758-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Everyday Memory Intervention
NCT04088136 COMPLETED NA