The Efficacy of Using Volunteers to Implement a Cognitive Stimulation Program in Two Long-Term Care Homes
NCT ID: NCT01818778
Last Updated: 2014-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adaptive Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults
NCT02205710
Effectiveness of Multimodal Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury Sustained During Older Adulthood
NCT04590911
Functional Impact of a Memory Intervention Program
NCT02087137
Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Enhancement: Classroom Study
NCT00337909
Recollection Training in Healthy Older Adults and Older Adults With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT00643266
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For eight weeks, three times each week, control group participants met for standard "friendly visits" (casual conversation between a resident and volunteer) and stimulation group participants met to work through a variety of exercises meant to stimulate the cognitive abilities of residents. Results were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA and indicated statistically significant Group x Time interactions for Verbal Memory (F(1, 33) = 7.92, p = .008), Non-Verbal Memory (F(1, 33) = 6.8, p = .014), Learning (F(1, 33) = 5.27, p = .028), and Verbal Fluency (F (1, 33) = 5.56, p = .024).
Volunteers completed a post-study questionnaire which indicated that the volunteers in the stimulation group found their skills-based interactions more stimulating for residents. Given this showing of improved resident abilities, it is reasonable to assert that the study does demonstrate that a volunteer-administered, cognitive stimulation program can provide measurable gains in the cognitive abilities of older adults. Further studies concerning the role of volunteers in the maintenance of the cognitive abilities of older adults are recommended.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulation Group
Cognitive Stimulation Group: One-on-one (one volunteer visiting one resident at a time), stimulation-group residents and stimulation-group volunteers met 3 times each week, for 8 weeks, to work through a variety of memory, reasoning, and selective attention exercises. Each visit was 20 minutes in length.
Cognitive stimulation program
The stimulation program was composed of therapy- and education-based exercises which were specifically designed to stimulate reasoning, memory, and attention skills in adults.
Control Group
Standard "Friendly Visit": Control-group residents and control-group volunteers, one-on-one, met for 8 weeks, 3 times each week, for "friendly visits". Each visit was 20 minutes in length.
Standard Friendly Visit
Volunteers provided standard "friendly visits" to residents which included a friendly greeting and casual conversation about issues which interest the resident.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive stimulation program
The stimulation program was composed of therapy- and education-based exercises which were specifically designed to stimulate reasoning, memory, and attention skills in adults.
Standard Friendly Visit
Volunteers provided standard "friendly visits" to residents which included a friendly greeting and casual conversation about issues which interest the resident.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* living in a long-term care home
* normal or corrected visual and auditory acuity
* English proficiency
* not currently using de-stabilizing, psychotropic medication known to impair cognition
* ability and willingness to actively listen to and accurately follow 2-step instructions for at least 20 consecutive minutes
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baycrest
OTHER
Queen's University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. John Kirby
Ph.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Kirby, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen's University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baycrest
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Queens-Baycrest 65
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.