Driving Evaluation and Fitness for Persons With Cognitive Impairments

NCT ID: NCT04648735

Last Updated: 2020-12-04

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 41 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-08-01
• Study Completion Date: 2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Driving is an important activity for older adults because it frequently relates to personal independence and wellbeing. This study compared the driving behaviors of older drivers with normal cognition and with MCI in unfamiliar driving situations and difficult maneuvers, and explored the practice effect on driving performance of drivers with MCI.

This study used an observational, cross-section research design.

Detailed Description

Driving is an important activity for older adults because it is frequently related to personal independence, mobility, social interaction, wellbeing, and confidence. Dementia can impair older adults' driving. The current consensus is that people with moderate or severe dementia are too cognitively impaired to drive safely. Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), often considered a transitional state to dementia, and those with mild dementia can still potentially drive, although some require further evaluation to determine the driver's fitness to drive. Extensive research has been devoted to the development of fitness-to-drive assessments. However, very limited attention has been paid to whether the driving skills of drivers with MCI can improve and thus potentially prolong the driver's safe-driving years.

MCI is a common neurodegenerative disease in older adults, with a prevalence of 16-20%. It is estimated that 20-40% of the MCI population will progress to dementia. Despite the potential driving concerns, it should be noted that over 50% of people with MCI are considered safe drivers. Because un-warranted driving cessation may lead to depression, functional decline, and even increases in the family's care burden, researchers have guarded against the premature revocation of driving rights.

Recent studies exploring the driving behaviors of drivers with MCI have shown inconsistent results. For example, increasing difficulties and unsafe behaviors in driving can be considered early warning signs of possible cognitive impairment. There may be a connection between specific cognitive skills (such as flexibility of visual attention and executive functioning) and poorer driving performance on specific tasks, such as car-following and road-tracking. Drivers with MCI may encounter difficulties at intersections with stop signs or critical light changes, and with headway, driving speed, reaction time, and lateral control. However, the above studies were usually conducted with driving simulators.

Only a few studies have investigated the on-road driving performance of drivers with MCI. Wadley, et al. compared drivers with MCI to drivers with normal cognition on a standardized route with various driving maneuvers frequently encountered in daily life. The results showed "less than optimal" performance, such as statistically significant poor performances in overall driving skills, especially in lane control and left turns. Driving can become increasingly difficult, for the cognitive capacities of older drivers with MCI are likely to deteriorate over time.

Recent evidence has suggested that cognitive training can slow or even reverse the cognitive impairments associated with MCI. Cognition intervention have shown positive improvements in the immediate and delayed memory functions of persons with MCI after intervention. However, advances in cognitive training for persons with MCI have yet to be applied to driver rehabilitation.

Driving rehabilitation includes both screening for unsafe drivers and the provision of individually-tailored interventions for clients with disabilities or those with a recent health event. Older drivers with cognitive impairments, such as dementia, are frequently the focus of driver screening. The current literature on driving training or retraining, however, has focused on other client populations, such as stroke, traumatic head injuries, and spinal cord injuries, and excluded those with cognitive impairments or not included screening for cognitive impairments. Even though systematic reviews by Korner-Bitensky et al. (2009) and Unsworth et al. (2014) support that driver rehabilitation improves the on-road driving performance of older drivers, older drivers with MCI are rarely considered targets for driver re-training. This finding is surprising because the driving skills of drivers with MCI can be compromised. Drivers with MCI can potentially benefit most from driving re-education, yet few studies have discussed issues related to driving training of older drivers with MCI.

In short, it is imperative to maintain the independence of persons with cognitive impairments for as long as possible. Without intervention, the driving competence of persons with MCI is likely to deteriorate as the disease and age progress. This study is to explore this possibility by examining how drivers with MCI perform as compared to drivers with normal cognition when negotiating a new route and whether learning effects would manifest if the drivers were given opportunities to practice.

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment; Dementia, Mild; Driving Impaired; Drive

Keywords

Mild Cognitive Impairment; dementia; driving fitness; driving rehabilitation

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Drivers with cognitive impairments

The participants firstly completed a questionnaire of driving history and perceived driving competence, followed with a clinical physical and cognitive-perceptual assessment battery conducted by an occupational therapist to note any potential deficits that might affect driving performance. The participants, on a separate visit, completed three practice runs of a closed-circuit standardized course that included 8 driving maneuvers, followed by an on-road driving in the community fir 30 minutes.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

driving evaluation and practice

Intervention Type: OTHER

The participants completed the actual driving with a licensed driving instructor on the passenger side in the car and with a dual-control, automatic-transmission car.

Each participant completed three runs of the same route. The first twos were practices to familiarize themselves with the course. The driving instructor graded them on the third run. Each trial took about 10 minutes. The participants were scored according to governmental driver test guidelines. Scoring on individual driving maneuver is weighted. Depending on the type of error, 8, 16 or 32 points were deducted from 100, for example, 32 points for getting too close to pedestrian lane, running a red light or railroad crossing, and 8 points for stopping in S-curve forward and backward. 70 or above is considered as a pass. The occupational therapists in the backseat recorded driving behaviors, including whether the driver checked rear and side mirrors, excessive sweating, distractibility, number of adjustments, etc.

drivers with normal cognition

The participants firstly completed a questionnaire of driving history and perceived driving competence, followed with a clinical physical and cognitive-perceptual assessment battery conducted by an occupational therapist to note any potential deficits that might affect driving performance. The participants, on a separate visit, completed three practice runs of a closed-circuit standardized course that included 8 driving maneuvers, followed by an on-road driving in the community fir 30 minutes.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

driving evaluation and practice

Intervention Type: OTHER

The participants completed the actual driving with a licensed driving instructor on the passenger side in the car and with a dual-control, automatic-transmission car.

Each participant completed three runs of the same route. The first twos were practices to familiarize themselves with the course. The driving instructor graded them on the third run. Each trial took about 10 minutes. The participants were scored according to governmental driver test guidelines. Scoring on individual driving maneuver is weighted. Depending on the type of error, 8, 16 or 32 points were deducted from 100, for example, 32 points for getting too close to pedestrian lane, running a red light or railroad crossing, and 8 points for stopping in S-curve forward and backward. 70 or above is considered as a pass. The occupational therapists in the backseat recorded driving behaviors, including whether the driver checked rear and side mirrors, excessive sweating, distractibility, number of adjustments, etc.

Interventions

driving evaluation and practice

The participants completed the actual driving with a licensed driving instructor on the passenger side in the car and with a dual-control, automatic-transmission car.

Each participant completed three runs of the same route. The first twos were practices to familiarize themselves with the course. The driving instructor graded them on the third run. Each trial took about 10 minutes. The participants were scored according to governmental driver test guidelines. Scoring on individual driving maneuver is weighted. Depending on the type of error, 8, 16 or 32 points were deducted from 100, for example, 32 points for getting too close to pedestrian lane, running a red light or railroad crossing, and 8 points for stopping in S-curve forward and backward. 70 or above is considered as a pass. The occupational therapists in the backseat recorded driving behaviors, including whether the driver checked rear and side mirrors, excessive sweating, distractibility, number of adjustments, etc.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• age of at least 50 years
• possession of a valid driving license and driving experience for at least 15 years
• regular driving habit, defined as at least once a week, and
• no reported significant driving issues

Exclusion Criteria

• reported health conditions that could potentially compromise driving competence, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease or other neuromuscular diseases
• visual impairments without correction, or
• physical impairments found in physical function assessments

• Minimum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

National Cheng Kung University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Ling-Hui Chang

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Ling-Hui Chang, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Occupational Therapy, NCKU

References

Cheng YH, Pai MC, Shih BH, Jan SS, Lin CY, Chang LH. Driving practice effects for older drivers with mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2023 May;30(4):550-558. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2023.2184420. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 36905632 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

National ChengKung University

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id