Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams
NCT ID: NCT02592525
Last Updated: 2019-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
653 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Other outcome measures will be:
i) what option they chose, whether they feel conflict or regret about their decision, and the burden of care they feel; ii) the quality of life of clients;
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cluster A
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 4 months)
IP-SDM training for health professionals
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
Cluster B
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 11 months)
IP-SDM training for health professionals
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
Cluster C
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 18 months)
IP-SDM training for health professionals
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
Cluster D
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 25 months)
IP-SDM training for health professionals
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IP-SDM training for health professionals
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged ≥65 years;
* Receiving care from the IP home care team of the enrolled CISSS/CIUSSS
* Have made a decision about whether to stay at home or move to another location during the recruitment periods
* Are able to read, understand and write French or English
* Can give informed consent
In the case clients are not able to provide informed consent, their caregiver will be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
France Legare
Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
France Légaré, Ph. D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL)
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adisso EL, Taljaard M, Stacey D, Briere N, Zomahoun HTV, Durand PJ, Rivest LP, Legare F. Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Aging. 2022 Sep 20;5(3):e39386. doi: 10.2196/39386.
Legare F, Briere N, Stacey D, Lacroix G, Desroches S, Dumont S, Fraser KD, Rivest LP, Durand PJ, Turcotte S, Taljaard M, Bourassa H, Roy L, Painchaud Guerard G. Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-2016 01-01-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id