Can Value Champions Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing for People With Dementia?
NCT ID: NCT05359679
Last Updated: 2025-05-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
3300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-30
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a primary care clinician value champion for de-implementing PIMs among patients 65 years of age and older with a diagnosis of dementia. Medicare Part D pharmacy claims data will be analyzed at the end of the 12-month intervention for the primary outcome, the medication possession rates (MPR) for three groups of potentially inappropriate medications: antipsychotic medications, benzodiazepines, and hypoglycemic medications (sulfonylureas and insulin). In a similar fashion, a hospital admission, or an emergency department visit for a fall will be assessed at the end of the intervention using Medicare claims data. Finally, the five implementation outcomes will be evaluated at the end of the intervention from notes entered by the value champions in project workbooks.
Primary care clinics within each of the two participating ACOs will be randomized to either the intervention or control arms of the study. Prior to random assignment, the investigators will stratify practices based on high versus low historic prescribing rates. A primary care clinician from each clinic selected for the trial in the intervention arm (n=30 across the two ACOs) will be recruited as a clinician value champion for each intervention clinic. The clinician value champion will participate in twice monthly value champion web-based training sessions for six months and then launch a 12-month initiative within the clinician value champions' clinics to reduce PIM prescribing among PLWD. Study outcomes will be assessed 12 months after the clinician value champions launch the initiative.
The hypothesis is that for each medication class, the intervention will produce clinically relevant decreases in mean possession rates of 10% of a standard deviation in patients seen in intervention clinics compared to those who are seen in control group clinics.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Cognitive Empathy Training on Dementia Caregivers
NCT06650527
An Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Medications in Long-term Care Residents With Severe Dementia
NCT03539276
Improving Mood and Behavior in Assisted Living Residents Through Skills Training for Their Caregivers
NCT00255866
The Care for America's Aging Study
NCT06021704
Community-based Brain Health Program to Address Dementia Risk
NCT05529706
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For people living with dementia (PLWD) the overuse of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs), those for which the potential for harm outweighs benefit, remains a persistent problem despite evidence-based guidelines supporting de-adoption. A group of geriatric experts convened by the Choosing Wisely initiative identified three classes of PIMs for PLWD: antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and hypoglycemics (sulfonylureas and insulin) with adequate glycemic control. In a systematic review the prevalence of PIMs when cognitive impairment was reported ranged from 20.6% to 80.5%. Approximately 14.3% of Medicare Part D enrollees with dementia residing in the general community are prescribed an antipsychotic. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine prescriptions has been reported to be as high as 20% among elderly persons with dementia living in the community. The proportion of elderly patients with an A1c \< 7% who received a prescription for sulfonylurea, insulin or combined insulin and sulfonylurea therapies was 35.2%, 24.2% and 16.3% respectively and was as prevalent in those with dementia as in those without. Park and colleagues compared rates of prescribing low-value medications in the elderly from 2006-2015 in both traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Not only was there no difference in rates between the two groups, there was also no evidence of any decline in rates of prescribing over time, including use of benzodiazepines in PLWD.
Study Rationale:
The rationale for decreasing the use of PIMs is that use in this population of patients results in a greater likelihood of harm than benefit. Documented harms in the medical literature includes falls, worsening cognitive impairment, hospital admission, functional impairment, and death.
Name and Description of the Intervention:
One clinician value champion from each clinic randomized to the intervention arm will complete a value champion training program led by the P.I. and then implement care redesign activities in the clinical practice setting to reduce the use of low value prescribing in older adults with dementia. The 6-month training phase will consist of twice monthly web-based training sessions. A recently completed Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)-funded Value Champion Fellowship program resulted in the development of a training curriculum comprised of 10 learning modules for the training phase of the intervention and a project workbook to guide clinician value champions during the 12-month project phase. Following the 6 months of training, clinician value champions will participate in a monthly 1-hour shared learning sessions via video conference to share successes, challenges, and brainstorm solutions for 12 months (months 10-22 of the study). The investigators will invite former value champion fellows and faculty from the RWJF fellowship to participate in these meetings to support this new cohort of value champions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Value Champion Training Program
Intervention arm.
Value Champion Training Program
Clinicians from primary care clinic sites randomized to the intervention arm of the study will complete a 6-month clinician value champion training program by participating in a series of 12 web-based training sessions. No intervention will be conducted at clinics in the control arm.
Standard Care
Control group.
No Intervention
Usual clinical care - no value champion present at this clinical setting
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Value Champion Training Program
Clinicians from primary care clinic sites randomized to the intervention arm of the study will complete a 6-month clinician value champion training program by participating in a series of 12 web-based training sessions. No intervention will be conducted at clinics in the control arm.
No Intervention
Usual clinical care - no value champion present at this clinical setting
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical practices with clinical encounters with 10 or more Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's or Alzheimer's related dementia in the base years (2019-2020).
* Seen by a clinician at a participating practice as evidenced by one or more evaluation and management claim,
* Continuous coverage in Medicare Parts A, B and D and no months of Part C (Medicare Advantage),
* Two or more claims with an International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis for Alzheimer's or Alzheimer's related dementia 30 days apart or 1 inpatient stay with a principal diagnosis of Alzheimer's.
Exclusion Criteria
* Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in hospice any time in the 6 months before the start of the intervention
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Brown University
OTHER
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lorella Palazzo, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaiser Permanente
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Parchman ML, Perloff J, Ritter G. Can clinician champions reduce potentially inappropriate medications in people living with dementia? Study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2022 Sep 27;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01237-0.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FY21_Demo2_Parchman
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.