Experimental Control Investigation of the Impact of Assistive Technology on the User-caregiver Dyad: a Multi-site Trial
NCT ID: NCT00927706
Last Updated: 2014-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2011-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver
* a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used
* recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy
* therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver. The intervention is provided to the immediate treatment following the administration of baseline measures and the delayed intervention group six weeks later, after an additional baseline measurement. The treatment is six weeks long and the follow-up is 26 weeks.
Hypothesis 1: For community-dwelling older people, an intervention that increases the appropriateness of existing or new assistive technology(AT) for mobility or self-care will alter established patterns of human assistance, such that caregiver burden is reduced or eliminated.
Hypothesis 2: At the same time, AT users will report less difficulty in mobility or self-care, as well as enhanced subjective well-being, and satisfaction with their modified personal assistance strategy.
Hypothesis 3: Following the AT intervention, caregivers will report reduced physical and/or psychological demands and increased satisfaction with their caregiving-related activities compared with
* the pre-intervention period
* caregivers in a delayed intervention control group. Hypothesis 4: Decreased physical and/or psychological demands on helpers will be associated with increases in device users' satisfaction with their personal assistance strategies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autonomous At Home with Occupational Therapy Support and Assistive Devices
NCT06819982
Wheeled Mobility in Everyday Life
NCT00981344
What Are my Options to Stay Safe at Home: Technology For Aging at Home
NCT04267484
The Effect Of Dıfferent Cognıtıve Tasks On Manual Dexterıty And Dual Task Performance In Gerıatrıc Indıvıduals
NCT06901635
Telemonitoring of Activities of Daily Living in Home Care Services of Older Adults with Cognitive Deficits
NCT06888713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate intervention
Subjects and their caregivers randomized to this arm receive the intervention immediately after baseline data is collected.
Assistive technology updating and tune up intervention
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
Delayed Intervention
Subjects and their caregivers who are randomized to this group will receive the intervention after baseline measurements are administered twice (6 weeks apart).
Assistive technology updating and tune up intervention
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Assistive technology updating and tune up intervention
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have moderate to severe disability that limits their ability to move from place to place independently and/or to perform self-care activities.
* Living at home
* Receiving 2 or more hour per week of assistance with mobility and/or self-care activities from a non-professional, caregiver who is also willing to take part in the study.
* Those caregivers will be adults aged 18 years and over.
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Louise Demers
Département de l'ergothérapie
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Louise Demers, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université de Montréal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Simon Fraser University
Vancovuer, British Columbia, Canada
Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Bordeaux-Cartierville--St-Laurent
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
the Centre de santé et des services sociaux Cavendish
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
the Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Laval
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIDRR: H133A060062
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CRIUM-8317
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.