Improving How Older Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Outcomes Are Selected for Care Coordination

NCT ID: NCT05820295

Last Updated: 2025-09-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-17

Study Completion Date

2024-07-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization will determine the comparative effectiveness of two approaches for assigning care coordinators to older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes. The hypothesis is that assigning care coordinators to older adults based on perceived need will be more effective at preventing emergency department visits and hospitalizations compared to usual care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This project will use a pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization (ACO) to determine the comparative effectiveness of two different approaches for selecting older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes to receive support from care coordinators: (1) an approach that assigns older adults to care coordinators based on self-reported difficulty with care coordination, or (2) usual care, which generally assigns older adults to care coordinators after hospital discharge, regardless of perceived need. The investigators will include community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or 1 or more CVD risk factors who have been attributed to the NewYork Quality Care ACO and who have fragmented care. The investigators will randomize the participants into two groups. This study is highly pragmatic, and the intervention is sustainable and scalable. Moreover, the proposed approach has the potential to improve care delivery and outcomes for older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases Myocardial Infarction Atrial Fibrillation Diabetes Mellitus Heart Failure Hyperlipidemias Hypertension Ischemic Heart Disease Stroke Transient Ischemic Attack

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

The intervention group will assign care coordinators to individuals based on perceived need for assistance with care coordination. Perceived need will be measured through a proxy's responses to a previously validated telephone survey on perceptions of care coordination.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Care coordination delivered based on perceived need

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

If patients in intervention group report on the survey that they experience difficulty coordinating care among their providers, the patient will be selected for care management services. Those services will attempt to address the problems with care coordination that the proxy reported.

Control

Usual care assigns patients to care coordinators in response to a discharge from a hospital or a direct referral from a physician.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Care coordination delivered based on usual care (e.g. discharge from hospital)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

If a patient is discharged from a hospital, the patient will be selected for care management services.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Care coordination delivered based on perceived need

If patients in intervention group report on the survey that they experience difficulty coordinating care among their providers, the patient will be selected for care management services. Those services will attempt to address the problems with care coordination that the proxy reported.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Care coordination delivered based on usual care (e.g. discharge from hospital)

If a patient is discharged from a hospital, the patient will be selected for care management services.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older,
* Attributed to the NewYork Quality Care accountable care organization,
* Are community-dwelling,
* Have cardiovascular disease or 1 or more cardiovascular risk factors, and
* Had highly fragmented ambulatory care in the prior year (defined as a reversed Bice-Boxerman Index greater than or equal to 0.85)

Exclusion Criteria

* Those who reside in long-term care or nursing home facilities (based on addresses in Medicare claims)
* Enrolled in home hospice
* Dementia (as measured in claims using the Bynum Standard 1-year definition)
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa M Kern, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1K18HS029255-01

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

22-09025263

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Resilient Together for Dementia
NCT06421545 COMPLETED NA
Couples Lived Experience
NCT04863495 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Caring for the Caregiver Network
NCT03049501 COMPLETED NA
Dementia Family Caregiver Study
NCT04894006 RECRUITING NA
Learning Amyloid and Tau Results
NCT07222930 NOT_YET_RECRUITING