Evaluation of Programs of Coordinated Care and Disease Management

NCT ID: NCT00627029

Last Updated: 2015-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18277 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a Congressionally mandated study. In the original study, 16 demonstration programs provided care coordination services to beneficiaries with chronic illness in Medicare's fee-for-service program. A five-year CMS-funded study tested whether the programs can improve patients' use of medical services, improve patients' outcomes and satisfaction with care, and reduce Medicare costs. The study also assessed physicians' satisfaction with the programs.

In 2008 Congress extended the project for two of the original programs--Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa and Health Quality Partners in Pennsylvania--and they will enroll Medicare beneficiaries and provide care coordination services into the spring of 2010.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (MPR) evaluated 16 independent demonstration sites that provide coordinated care interventions to Medicare beneficiaries with chronic illnesses. The rationale for the demonstration is the lack of coordination among the multiple providers typically serving Medicare beneficiaries with chronic illnesses, as well as the adverse consequences of the lack of coordination for the beneficiaries and for Medicare costs. The demonstration sites, selected in early 2001, offered programs designed to improve both the care that patients receive and patients' knowledge of, and adherence with, recommended self-care and behavior. The study estimated the effects of each site on patients' well-being and satisfaction, in addition to the site's effects on the use and cost of Medicare covered services. This analysis relied on a patient survey conducted 6 to 12 months after enrollment, and on Medicare claims data and any data available from the demonstration sites that could enhance the study. The study included two rounds of physician surveys. In each site, eligible applicants were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. An extensive process analysis was conducted to describe the interventions in detail, with the key goal being an assessment of those factors that account for program success and failure. The study included case studies of each site, program profiles, interim site-specific memos, two interim summary reports, two reports to Congress (based on the interim summary reports), and a final summary report. This original study enrolled 18,277 beneficiaries.

In 2008 Congress extended the study for 2 of the sites, Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa and Health Quality Partners in Pennsylvania, and they will recruit beneficiaries and provide demonstration intervention services through the spring of 2010. Mathematica Policy Research will evaluate the results of this extended demonstration using Medicare claims data and qualitative site visits to the two programs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congestive Heart Failure Diabetes Coronary Artery Disease Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cancer Cerebrovascular Disease Alzheimer's Disease Psychotic Disorder Major Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Care coordination, consisting variously (depending on the demonstration site)--nurse telephonic counseling, nurse in-person home visits, home telemonitoring equipment, and physician education and feedback.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Care Coordination

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Depending on the demonstration site, may consist of nurse telephonic counseling and monitoring, nurse in-person or home visits, home telemonitoring equipment, patient educational materials, patient group educations classes, physician education and feedback.

Control

Usual care in Medicare fee-for-service from beneficiaries' physicians and other health care providers

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Care Coordination

Depending on the demonstration site, may consist of nurse telephonic counseling and monitoring, nurse in-person or home visits, home telemonitoring equipment, patient educational materials, patient group educations classes, physician education and feedback.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meets clinical and prior health service use criteria of each of the 16 demonstration sites (vary across demonstration programs)
* Resides in catchment area of one of the programs
* Enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service program
* Coverage by both Medicare Parts A and B
* Medicare is primary payer

Exclusion Criteria

* Not enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan (Medicare managed care program)
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Randall S. Brown, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Carol A. Magee, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospice of the Valley MediCaring Project

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Georgetown University Medical Center-Mind My Heart Program

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Quality Oncology/Matria Healthcare

Sunrise, Florida, United States

Site Status

CorSolutions/Matria Healthcare

Rosemont, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Foundation and Hospital

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa

Mason City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Medical Care Development

Augusta, Maine, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Charlestown/Erickson Retirement Communities

Catonsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Washington University-St.Louis School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

QMed, Inc.

Eatontown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lovelace Health Systems

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Jewish Home Lifecare

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

CenVaNet

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):603-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.126.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19211468 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/reports/downloads/Brown.pdf

The Evaluation of the Medicare Coordinated Care Demonstration: Findings for the First Two Years

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMS 500-95-0047(09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MPR 8756

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of a Mobility Program
NCT02674503 COMPLETED NA